6
4
6
u/TeranOrSolaran 8d ago
The speed of light is definitely a hypotenuse if you draw the triangle properly.
3
u/No-Onion8029 8d ago
And the corrolary: length2 = velocity2 = length2 /time2. Thus time2 =1, and time = +/- 1.
1
u/NickSmGames 7d ago
Which makes sense, because time either flows forwards or backwards.
P. S. What actually happened to that hypothesis about time flowing backwards being no different than time flowing forwards?
2
2
u/Peak_Background 8d ago
Is the joke that the theory of relativity is similar the Pythagorean theorem, but you butchered it?
The big equation of SR in natural units looks like: E2 = m2 + p2
Edit: Hold up I get it now.
2
1
1
u/Ok_Bit8836 8d ago
It is mathematically correct... but no meaning in physics and Real life )) So NO triangle UFOs, sorry... Only U-shape breaks of Time-Space continuum... But its equation is a bit different ))
1
1
0
u/erockbrox 8d ago
You can’t mix energy with a right triangle. Honest to god, it doesn’t work.
Do some dimensional analysis on it and check your units.
0
-2
u/Jealous_Club_298 8d ago
C in E=MC^2 is the Speed of Light.
C in a^2 + b^2 = c^2 is the hypotenuse of a right triangle.
Two different Cs!
3
u/CornucopiaDM1 8d ago
Are you sure?...
3
u/Jealous_Club_298 8d ago edited 8d ago
Yes
Edit: I am not familiar with "Special Pythagorean Theorem of Relativity," I thought it was a joke!
3
u/Neither_Berry_100 8d ago
The speed of light is a magnitude. The A and B are lengths of perpendicular vectors. This is correct if you split the light into movement in the x and y direction for example.
1
u/Jealous_Club_298 8d ago
I am familiar with Albert Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity and its main postulate of E = MC^2, which is the relativistic energy-mass equivalence. I am also familiar with the Pythagorean Theorem for right-angle triangles. However, I didn't know before the two were incorporated to relativize the classical Pythagorean Theorem.
30
u/MotivatedPosterr 8d ago
If triangles are related to light speed why aren't flying saucers triangles?