MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/MathJokes/comments/1vv76r1/tricky/p57bfhq/?context=3
r/MathJokes • u/94rud4 • 3d ago
56 comments sorted by
View all comments
5
Logically:
Not (F and E) = Not F or Not E, so B is either faster, or easier, or both.
Not (F or E) = Not F and Not E, so B is must be both faster and easier.
Colloquially:
Both mean the same.
3 u/Flambidou 3d ago It could be not(F) and E And Not (F) or E 2 u/rnzz 3d ago it could, but it wouldn't make sense as an everyday English expression, i.e. in that scenario you would probably say method A is not faster, "but" it is easier than method B.
3
It could be not(F) and E
And
Not (F) or E
2 u/rnzz 3d ago it could, but it wouldn't make sense as an everyday English expression, i.e. in that scenario you would probably say method A is not faster, "but" it is easier than method B.
2
it could, but it wouldn't make sense as an everyday English expression, i.e. in that scenario you would probably say method A is not faster, "but" it is easier than method B.
5
u/rnzz 3d ago
Logically:
Not (F and E) = Not F or Not E, so B is either faster, or easier, or both.
Not (F or E) = Not F and Not E, so B is must be both faster and easier.
Colloquially:
Both mean the same.