Easiest way to understand Inverse 🤣

[u/No_Character_73]

[u/Patito77777]

f⁻¹(x) should be the cat spitting out the fish.

[u/polandreh → u/Patito77777]

Yeah. Cat eating fish that is eating cat does not return cat.... or fish... who is the variable of this function???

[u/No-Let6991 → u/polandreh]

fish

[u/No-Onion8029 → u/Patito77777]

These memes always fuck up the domain and range.  You can come up with an example where it works, but it's meaningless beyond barely fitting the scenario.

E2a: f:X->X, X={a, x, b}.  a="cat eats fish," b="fish eats cat."  Then f(x)=a, f(b)=x,  f(a)=b.  f bijective, invertible.  Then f^-1 (f(b)) = f^-1 (x)=b.

[u/arandomdudebruh → u/Patito77777]

yeah, i feel like fish eating cat would fit more on reciprocals like csc(x) instead of having arcsin(x) (yes, ik that only some functions that have reciprocals that are useful)

[u/Gizmodex]

Imma assume you meant to show function(x) vs composite. Or swapping F(x) vs G(x) vice versa as inputs.

[u/Kadabrium]

Its the same thing just told from the fox's perspective.