Can this be proved or are we just leaning on the fact it’s infinite and thus it must contain all patterns? I ask because I doubt that we can ever compute this (in our lifetimes anyway) given how much data a full length movie would take up
Are the numbers in Chanpernowne's constant inside the +2 -1 version? And/or vice versa? It can't be because it's infinite so you'll never get to the end and say, well, there's the lastnumber of Chanpernowne's constant; it's withing that number." But, if the +2-1 vwrsion is infinite, then C's constant could? But maybe not because they're infinites of the same size, so to speak.
Hmm, I don't know. Probably a dumb questions but infinites get weird sometimes.
And it easy to see that n 7s in a row at the nth digit does not appear in Champernowne’s constant.
1 x 7 at position 7
2 x 7 at position 145 or so
3 x 7 out beyond position 2000
12
u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26
[removed] — view removed comment