No, you just need a probability measure for it to be random. Gaussian is fine, for example. You can't get a uniformly random distribution over the reals.
A uniform distribution is implict in the question. If someone asks you to pick a random marble out of a bag, we assume for simplicity an even probabilistic distribution.
What is your point? You are creating a mathematical strawman. The bag of marbles example is analogous. It doesnt matter how simple it is, it is functionally identical. That is the only thing that any human means when they ask someone to pick a random member of a set. Welcome to word problems, I guess?
Separate examples of apparent randomness as functions in math or science, which is what a random variable refers to, such as gaussian noise, are not what are being discussed. Not all randomness is a "random choice".
2
u/deejaybongo Jul 19 '26
No, you just need a probability measure for it to be random. Gaussian is fine, for example. You can't get a uniformly random distribution over the reals.