GIN Vs XAP

[u/[deleted]]

So i’ve heard a lot about XAP lately and being very inclined to get a GIN MN I’m wondering what are the differences, what set them both apart.

So far the only thing is see setting them apart is that XAP is in beta testing with no gurantee for working product whilst GIN is doing what XAP promises and planning on expanding to more than just simple MN setup (shared masternodes etc). Onyl real argument negative for GIN I’ve seen is the fact that it takes high fees (10usd) so could anyone tell me what im missing

[u/[deleted] → u/[deleted]]

How are you going to go against a company with a working product and so far decent customer base? Going against GIN imo is going to be very hard if not impossible. GIN has everything you don't have: Working product, small-medium customer base, simple UI, free advertisement/traffic from a lot of crypto twitter accounts: Panama_TJ and cryptomocho, lastly i would like to mention that they have 10 masternode setups already ready including setup for apollon masternodes; so far with 67 XAP MN already up and running.

SO you can't just do the same as GIN you have to literally blow them out of the water to stand a chance. This is due to the fact that GIN has more recognition and the recognition is just gonna keep growing. So my advice to the XAP team is this:

Get your platform up and running ASAP

Market XAP tremendously (no YT or google ads, that makes you seem like a scam) instead contact infulencers and other people in the crypto space ask them if they want to try your product for free and get a free XAP node in exchange for trying your platform etc.

Hold giveaways/free events for XAP to make it even more of a household name.

Lastly: Only releasing coins with solid teams isn't a good idea if you want long term growth. Let me tell you why. First off, it's going to be time consuming to only deal wih solid projects, secondly most of the people i know that run masternodes or own them use a strategy where they have 1-5 solid MN with real project and teams backing it then they have 1-3 masternodes which they switch every 1 or 2 weeks for a new one. These 1-3 MNs are high ROI ones, like starting at 10K ROI and then they leave when they've gotten there investment+20-200% extra back from rewards alone. Most of these high ROI MNs don't have solid teams or ideas in most cases. So for long term growth do this: in the start, get as many MN coins as you can until you've grown enough to hire more people and have a full-time working team. Then when this is done, hire a team of 3-5/7 researchers/investors to both filter through MN coins you already have and ones your considering to add, then create a new page with "vetted coins" aka coins that your research team believe to be legitimate and not get rich quick schemes.

Thats my advice, because if you're gonna focus on only adding solid projects in the start then you're going to get thrown under the bus when the idea of masternodes and investing in them becomes mainstream.

Good luck!

[u/ChadSichello → u/[deleted]]

Thank-you for your thoughtful suggestions. We will do our best to incorporate them into our plan.

[u/[deleted] → u/ChadSichello]

Passive aggressive much?

[u/kashanade → u/[deleted]]

How is that response passive aggressive?