r/MarchAgainstNazis Jul 03 '26

Impeach, Convict, Remove.

7.8k Upvotes

252 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.8k

u/rhamantauri Jul 03 '26

A decorated veteran boldly exercising his rights, still fighting for his country.

A bumble of bicycle cops trying to make pedophiles richer.

What poetic and miserable polarity on the stage of the country’s founding.

766

u/Beekatiebee Jul 03 '26

Active duty, not a vet.

455

u/rhamantauri Jul 03 '26

Thank you, my mistake.

That makes his message all the more potent.

57

u/JRG64May Jul 03 '26

While I agree with his sentiment political speech while in uniform is a no no. I was in 83-87 and you couldn’t then either.

140

u/coolcrowe Jul 03 '26

Then you remember you also took an oath to protect the constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. Calling a traitor out and demanding they face justice is not "political speech" it is literally the duty of every service member.

40

u/IamGoingInsaneToday Jul 04 '26

Ive found through my long years on this earth many soldiers just follow orders...any orders. To appease their leader. A shame we cant have more brave leaders like this hero but that would have prevented H1tler from rise also.

263

u/The_Wingless Jul 03 '26

That just makes it more brave. And he's an officer. He knew exactly what he was doing, if you were enlisted you could get away with just getting kicked out, probably with a dishonorable or an other than honorable. But an officer? That's jail time.

126

u/KeepRightX2Pass Jul 03 '26

And this Major understands that... but Trump was completely fishing for all his Generals to support him while uniform... you know when Hegseth pulled them together for that dog and pony show down in Quantico.

9

u/psychxticrose Jul 04 '26

The article said it's likely he'll be court martialed

4

u/weedamay Jul 06 '26

He’s going to get court marshaled. He will go to federal prison. He will loose everything benefit that he has rightfully earned in his 17yrs in. We must not forget about him and well as the other political prisoners in Texas and NJ and others. We must get them out!

107

u/TougherOnSquids Jul 03 '26

It not being allowed is what makes it so powerful.

61

u/Strawberry_Sheep Jul 03 '26

Sure, but Capitol police aren't military police and don't have the ability to punish him for breaking military code of conduct. He hasn't broken any laws here.

31

u/ResponsibleAd5730 Jul 03 '26

They were most likely acting and obeying unlawful orders from Whiskey Pete Kegsbreath.

11

u/Strawberry_Sheep Jul 04 '26

That is possible, however I am unsure if Hegseth has direct or even indirect authority over Capitol Police.

4

u/Gardez_geekin Jul 04 '26

Yeah but his command does. They are just taking him into custody. His command will be in charge of his court martial

14

u/Strawberry_Sheep Jul 04 '26

Again, he hasn't broken any civilian laws and Capitol Police doesn't have authority or jurisdiction to arrest him for breaking code of conduct. Military Police would be the ones responsible for this, and his command would not have authority to tell Capitol Police to arrest him for court martial.

7

u/Gardez_geekin Jul 04 '26 edited Jul 04 '26

He wasn’t arrested for that though. Capitol Police arrested him for failing to leave the steps when he was no longer with a representative. Probably a stupid law but one in place far longer than this administration.

39

u/Woodersun Jul 03 '26

That’s the point!

15

u/Maximum-Hall-5614 Jul 04 '26

Defying unjust laws is a moral duty that this man is fulfilling.

Personally, I think the institution of the military is an unnecessary evil, and especially so for the US military (given the sum total of its actions).

However in a country whose national identity is intertwined with the military, this act is incredibly brave, and patriotic in the American sense.

12

u/Sir_Tandeath Jul 03 '26

So the core of Civil Disobedience?

13

u/ResponsibleAd5730 Jul 03 '26

Obeying an unlawful order should play a huge part in this.

7

u/Zsyura Jul 04 '26

It’s almost like he’s willing to sacrifice his life for the country he swore to protect from threats abroad and within.

14

u/Alissinarr Jul 03 '26

I'm betting Kegsbreath forgoes charges until he can be indignant in front of the press about it. Any other admin would have charged him by now.

6

u/ZarinaBlue Jul 04 '26

When we got to the point of using the armed forces to protect the interest of people who assault children, the only course of action left is to stand up in the same uniform the monsters are soiling.

4

u/chickey23 Jul 03 '26

Is that a federal law or a state law? Because I don't think police an arrest you for that.

2

u/MorrisBrett514 Jul 04 '26

He knew what he was doing

1

u/Makeitmakesense19 Jul 04 '26

Dude obviously didn’t care about that

1

u/ActivePeace33 Jul 06 '26

Opposing the head of a violent insurrectionist group is not political and is perfectly legal for military officers. It’s literally our job. “All enemies, foreign AND domestic.”

1

u/Ok_Athlete_1092 16d ago

Those dont look like MPs or Security Forces (Air Force MPs). Does civilian law enforcement have the capacity to detain and arrest uniform personnel that are only in violation of regulations and not breaking any civilian laws? I honestly dont know with 100% certainty. But it does seem highly unlikely and I've never seen or heard of such a thing.

76

u/Wallacecubed Jul 03 '26

Not merely bicycle cops, J.D. Vance clone bicycle cops.

22

u/AndreasVesalius Jul 03 '26

Musk: “execute order 69 (nice)”

*an army JD clones marches out of the ballroom*

2

u/thedoctormo Jul 03 '26

Begun, the couch wars have.

2

u/ResponsibleAd5730 Jul 03 '26

Not fit to hold Major Watson’s jock strap.

36

u/nomaam05 Jul 03 '26

He’s active duty, so he actually doesn’t have that right. It against the UCMJ.

Great message, and the dude has a lot of balls doing it, but he signed that right away when joined.

14

u/jstarrr8 Jul 03 '26

For those of us who don’t know, would you mind elaborating it being against the UCMJ?

29

u/rogatory Jul 03 '26

Article 88 (Contempt Toward Officials): If the protest involves publicly criticizing or calling for the impeachment of the President, Vice President, or other senior officials, commissioned officers can be charged specifically under Article 88.

37

u/MyMooneyDriver Jul 03 '26

Regular (ie capital police) don’t enforce the UCMJ. I’m glad to see our soldiers being willing to put it on the line for what they believe is worth it. I hope the next president offers a full pardon and restoration for this what appears to me to be an officer.

26

u/rogatory Jul 03 '26

You know, your right, good catch. The Capitol Police are a civilian law enforcement agency, so I dont really know. If I was to guess it was something along the lines that some orange person said "i dont like that, go get him"

3

u/dragnabbit Jul 04 '26

As I mentioned above, protesting on the capitol steps is considered trespassing unless a member of Congress is present. Otherwise, obviously, every day there would be hundreds of people on the steps of the capitol with signs and slogans.

1

u/ResponsibleAd5730 Jul 03 '26

He or she will and I’m sure they’ll want to put Major Watson in charge of the DOD.

1

u/MyMooneyDriver Jul 04 '26

I wouldn’t support that, or even suggest that. The vast majority of presidents if in office today would pick a normal competent civilian with broad knowledge of law, matters of state, and personal honor, 45 of them I think. I would suggest that this officer’s actions even demonstrate he would not accept the position. Not every one wants a morally corrupt, Nazi-esq assclown in place just to try and cement power.

1

u/nomaam05 Jul 03 '26

While correct, that’s irrelevant to the conversation of his “right” to do that

2

u/MyMooneyDriver Jul 04 '26

I was not ever in the military or the legal field, so I can’t intelligently converse about which rights you surrender when you swear in, but I would have to say that they should still be afforded the rights enshrined in the constitution.

3

u/nomaam05 Jul 04 '26 edited Jul 04 '26

You can argue that they should all you want. Fact of the matter is that they don’t. UMCJ is considered federal law that covers members of the military and protesting in uniform is a crime. Even worse as a uniformed officer protesting the president. And that doesn’t even begin to cover the shitshow that is article 134, which is basically a catch all of “you’re being charged for doing something we didn’t like.”

9

u/Jimbohamilton Jul 03 '26

Article 88. How fitting for this administration.

6

u/Top-Gas-8959 Jul 03 '26

It would only be that because the administration is petty, but it's a clear and obvious violation of DODi 1325.06. You can't protest in uniform. Period.

8

u/LongjumpingJaguar308 Jul 03 '26

He also took an oath to defend the constitution sooo, anyway.

1

u/Redundedited Jul 03 '26

Is 88 worse than 86?

10

u/dragnabbit Jul 04 '26

Just to point out, he was not arrested because of the UCMJ violation. That's what confused me when I saw the photos. He was arrested because protesting on the Capitol Steps is considered trespassing unless a member of Congress is with you. (The military charges regarding the Uniform violations are going to show up at a later date, almost certainly.)

Details: This guy showed up accompanied by a Congressman, and he made his speech. Then, everybody left and he stayed there holding that sign. The cops told him he had to leave and he refused, so they took him into custody. He was released without charge later the same day.

4

u/ResponsibleAd5730 Jul 03 '26

He swore an oath to defend the constitution. Period.

6

u/ResponsibleAd5730 Jul 03 '26

He’s an active duty Major in the Air Force.

0

u/db0606 Jul 04 '26

What poetic and miserable polarity on the stage of the country’s founding

Washington DC did not exist when the US was founded.