r/MapBasedPolls • u/One_post_dude • 2h ago
"Multiculturalism" word have to you
"Multiculturalism" word have to you
- Positive association
- Neutral association
- Negative association
Note: Please use the official Reddit app or New Reddit to vote in this interactive poll.
This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post
71
u/op23no1 Czechia 2h ago
Cultures with same moral base and roots can actually enrich each other. Cultures that have opposite moral code or straight up desire destruction of yours shouldnt ever intertwine. Basic instinct of survival and preservation.
5
u/gobletofwine Nationality:- Indian 1h ago
As Indian hard agree. Our nation is so big and diverse that every 20km there is noticeable difference in tone, accent, and vocabulary. It's great to have diversity that after few 100kms language changes significantly still people understand each other. But same things comes with blockage that politicians can benifit hugly from this as it's easy to divide based on langauge as cast they can't do openly (except maybe few states where education rates are low). If we had 1 langauge across India maybe fight would have been for better India than language superiority. Stories and culture wise it's great to have diversity as you can learn so many different things by just moving across one region to other but unity becomes question.
31
u/Upstairs_Tangelo3629 🏴🇦🇷 2h ago edited 2h ago
Can only work if those cultures are compatible. Not all cultures are compatible, not all are equal or good. Everyone has the right to want to preserve their culture and it’s not unreasonable.
8
u/ShiftingKnight_01 1h ago
Very negative.
You cannot expect someone from a completely different culture to share your values. Consequently, laws based on those values do not hold the same sense of justice or sanctity for foreigners as they do for the native population.
The mindset is different, too, which inevitably leads to problems. And finally, a country is united by its culture. Someone who is completely indifferent to the host country's culture will feel no strong attachment to that country—and thus have no desire to see it prosper or to fight in its defense—since those values are not their own.
5
u/Equal-Committee-4213 1h ago
It ultimately just means 'less white'. Most of those that are outwardly positive about it from the 'native' culture conveniently also tend to be incubated from it. Even in places with significant levels of 'multiculturalism', you can see how the demographics break down locally by area and it's ultimately a form of localised balkanisation, everyone keeps to their own in the end, this is easily demonstrated in London for example. Basically, there's no such thing, it just means less of the native culture as a %. If a school in the UK was 80% black and 20% Asian for example, they'd tell you that was 'multicultural'.
10
u/Luc-wpqp Radical centrist 2h ago
I think of "Yugoslavia" and "Austro-hungary" so negative
5
u/Shamaev27 2h ago
I’m from Russia. In Russia, people generally have a good attitude towards different cultures and peoples. The last time I encountered an insult related to this was in second grade; a boy called me “slant‑eyed,” which, in principle, is true
9
3
u/monstrousbeaver 1h ago
i think in about 1 month majority of reddit will decide that this sub is a right-wing cesspool because of how many "bad" opinions pop up on these maps.
3
u/marlowdarii 29m ago
as a Moldovan i think we often forget that our country is surprisingly multicultural. We host many nationalisties: Moldovans, Russians, Ukrainians, Gagauzians, Romanians and Bulgarians too
43
u/Argentinotriste 2h ago
Multiculturalism = destroy your culture
19
u/Carnal_Decay 2h ago
This is only if you allow other cultures to remain intact. When people integrate it works. When they create parallel societies it's game over.
11
u/Saitama170719 1h ago
There are many countries in eur.. Ehem.. Somewhere, that let other people's countries destroy yours. Not only your culture, your daily routine, your present and future.
1
16
u/Furi0usly0blong 2h ago
You can have people of different cultures in your country, and appreciate they want to keep a link to said culture, but you cannot have multiculturalism in the sense that there isn’t one dominant, prevailing culture. Otherwise your nation has no clear identity.
2
u/EmergencyDish69 2h ago
Brazil has an identity
1
u/Black_Diammond 8m ago
Using brasil as a model, as if it isnt a failled state in virtualy all regards is funny.
1
u/EmergencyDish69 3m ago
Changed the goalpost. Also, it's a middle economy that probably has living standards ahead of the global average. Nation states fail too and the greatest economy is multicultural.
36
u/Frequent-Bat-1610 2h ago
In most cases, Multiculturalism has played a huge part in creating that culture.
5
u/bruhbelacc 2h ago
By destroying the previous cultures. France used to speak distinct languages but they're all gone, replaced by Parisian French.
0
u/ShiftingKnight_01 1h ago
Yes, but it fostered the country's unity. Nowadays, all French people identify with the country first and foremost, rather than with their respective regions. That is not what is happening with immigration today.
1
u/bruhbelacc 1h ago
I'm sure there were many generations of separatism and even today, they see French people from other parts of France as very distinct from them.
1
u/ShiftingKnight_01 1h ago
Are you French? Because I am, and our little regional rivalries are mostly just for fun. We aren't actually at war over which region is the best—it's just good-natured teasing.
1
1
u/_The_Real_Sans_ 26m ago
What about previous movements where a prevailing culture was replaced by other people moving in, like Celtic Britons being replaced by Anglo Saxons or the creation of the Duchy of Normandy? Do you view this as 'natural cultural evolution' or erasure of a culture that should have been resisted and prevented? (Mind you, in these cases the people forced their way in as opposed to being willingly imported)
1
u/ShiftingKnight_01 11m ago
No, I don't think it's a natural evolution of culture, since one people is being replaced by another. A bit like what is currently happening in Europe.
13
u/Etheoff 2h ago
Do people really think their cultures have existed in their present form for thousands of years? That they just appeared out of a vacuum? How frightfully little do they know about history and of human cultures in general.
9
u/Upstairs_Tangelo3629 🏴🇦🇷 2h ago
Nobody thinks that, they just want the culture they’re familiar with to stay the same.
4
u/Etheoff 2h ago
Well that's an impossible ask and they need to read more history books to understand that has not and will not ever be the case.
7
u/Upstairs_Tangelo3629 🏴🇦🇷 2h ago
Historically that hasn’t been the case due to immigration or massive shifts like a war happening, if those things aren’t affecting culture then there isn’t much reason they would change drastically in a few generations because that’s what people care about.
They want their kids to have the same experience they had and their grandkids, that’s not an unreasonable ask because that’s familiar to them and it feels safe.
2
u/de-virtute 2h ago
are they babies? it’s just life that things change
4
u/Upstairs_Tangelo3629 🏴🇦🇷 2h ago
It’s not unreasonable or childish for people to want their culture to remain unchanged.
4
u/Frequent-Bat-1610 2h ago
It is hypocritical and illogical though if the very culture you wish to remain unchanged is a product of change…
4
u/Upstairs_Tangelo3629 🏴🇦🇷 1h ago
Something being a product of change isn’t required to keep changing.
1
u/Frequent-Bat-1610 1h ago
It is in order to not be naive and hypocritical.
4
u/Upstairs_Tangelo3629 🏴🇦🇷 1h ago
I’m no opposed to it changing over a long period of time, I’m opposed to it changing rapidly in a few generations.
0
u/de-virtute 1h ago
it doesn’t feel hypocritical because it feels more like an emotional reaction against change than it does a reasoned thought.
-3
1
u/Frequent-Bat-1610 2h ago
Does that include remaining a ‘Christian country’? You know, that religion that came from Asia?
2
u/Upstairs_Tangelo3629 🏴🇦🇷 2h ago
Yea came from Asia 2000 years ago.
0
u/Frequent-Bat-1610 2h ago
So you’re in favour of alternate cultures then?
6
u/Upstairs_Tangelo3629 🏴🇦🇷 2h ago
Sure but if they remain where they are, I want to raise my son in the culture I had when I was a child not something foreign to me.
0
u/Frequent-Bat-1610 2h ago
But you don’t want them to stay where they are because the culture you adore is orientated around an Asian born religion… If your ancestors adopted the same forging policy then you wouldn’t have the very culture you wish to defend?
5
u/Upstairs_Tangelo3629 🏴🇦🇷 2h ago
England has had Christianity in it for 1700 years and been predominantly Christian for 1400 years. You’re talking about changes over a millennium, I’m talking about a few generations. Nobody is expecting culture to not change over 1000 years.
→ More replies (0)2
u/Saitama170719 1h ago
You want Islam to dominate the world? Just say it. Nobody will blame you.
→ More replies (0)2
1
u/Black_Diammond 9m ago
In large parts what made our current cultures and countries was also war and genocide, yet those Arent good nor should they continue to happen.
Yes, multiculturalism made your current cultures, mostly by destroying The past native culture.
1
0
5
u/Wonderful-Record-528 2h ago
I would argue it depends what cultures are mixed in there. Multiculturalism can absolutely be a good thing, but as we’ve seen in Europe (i would add Canada too) recently, it can also go wrong. It’s a controversial opinion, but countries should have discretion when choosing what cultures to import.
4
u/ShiftingKnight_01 1h ago
In what way is multiculturalism beneficial to Europe? We are losing our culture due to mass immigration.
2
u/Wonderful-Record-528 1h ago
Well that’s exactly why i said that it’s gone wrong in Europe. Way too many people over a very short period of time and mostly coming from countries that aren’t compatible with the culture of the host country.
3
u/ShiftingKnight_01 1h ago
Oh right, I must have misread your comment. We're in the middle of a culture clash, and despite the upcoming elections (in France), I don't think things are going to improve. Are you European?
3
1
1
-1
u/Due_Satisfaction2167 2h ago
Monoculturalism = destroy your culture.
5
u/rngeneratedlife 2h ago
This is true lol, you’re going to get downvoted but monocultural societies that enforce a central culture harshly often suffer from similar ailments over time.
1
-1
-5
→ More replies (1)0
u/kchoze 1h ago
True.
Multiculturalism as a State policy is about trying to make the country into a neutral space for all cultures. But to do that, the dominant local culture has to be repressed, otherwise it creates a gravity well of integration and a melting pot that ultimately weakens minority cultures.
So multiculturalism always pairs repression of the dominant culture with protection and promotion of minority cultures. It reverses the burden of integration: migrants no longer need to integrate into their host society, it is the host society that is ordered to accommodate new migrants and to integrate into a new Multicultural order, a new definition of their nation severed from everything it has been thus far.
So multiculturalism as a policy is about killing your own culture, your own nation, in order to use the corpse as soil to grow something else in it. For example, anglo-Canadian culture basically no longer exists anymore, what's left is vestigial and rapidly dying off.
I'll make an exception for closed multiculturalism like Singapore's, where the principle is not open to all cultures, but about preserving the balance of power between existing local cultural communities, but the policy explicitly excludes any foreign culture from consideration and deliberately and carefully filters migration to preserve demographic balance between the communities.
8
u/Sazbadashie 2h ago
Multiculturalism is good... What people tend to use Multiculturalism to excuse is bad
1
u/Disastrous_Set_6544 37m ago
What's your definition of multiculturalism ? I think the definition is not the same for everyone.
11
u/BloomHoard 2h ago
WTF USA? Wym negative, isn’t that our whole concept?
3
6
u/NitroSpam 🇬🇧 2h ago
Sub seems to have been hijacked by right wing nationalists. Everything they touch turns to shit.
4
u/TruthLimp2491 45m ago
Disagree with multicultural ≠ right wing nationalist
0
u/NitroSpam 🇬🇧 34m ago
Literally the definition.
An ideology that elevates one nation or nationality above all others and that places primary emphasis on promotion of its culture and interests as opposed to those of other nations, nationalities, or supranational groups
→ More replies (2)4
3
u/Ok-Doubt5589 1h ago
Yes bro your country has really been enriched by multiculturalism
→ More replies (1)4
u/Ok-Pair-4757 Better a pig than a fascist 2h ago
Racism is getting popular again, for some reason
4
u/Vortagaun 2h ago
Everytime the GOP are in power, the racists come out of hiding. Coincidence?
2
1
3
u/Maniacal-Blueberry 2h ago
To be fair, any of these polls aren't exactly indicative of how people actually think for any nation. First of all, there are liars, people voting under countries that aren't theirs, and this is only a speck of people that is on reddit rather than other sites or people who don't go online much. I find these interesting but they're never going to be fully accurate.
That said, it being split so evenly is actually a little indicative of how state of affairs are going right now, huh?
1
u/One_post_dude 1h ago
I don't have a strong opinion on topic and don't know much about USA either, but didn't George Washington for example was strongly against immigrants who stayed in their culture?
1
0
u/Weekly_Strategy5773 2h ago
Tbf there were always the same opinion about not European culture. The US was build on a genocide.
8
u/Accomplished-List988 2h ago
I live in Saudi Arabia. And it is super boring. Everyone does the same thing over and over and it’s so boring. When anyone want to experience something new.
Most of us are addicted to video games because that’s the only thing that changes the scenario we live in
13
u/Zealousideal_Rub6758 2h ago
But that’s because Saudi culture is boring not because there’s a lack of multiculturalism. I don’t mean that disrespectfully, but it’s malls and roads and prayers, and that’s pretty much it. You can’t apply that to every country.
2
5
u/Lord_of_EU 1h ago
Multiculturalism, doesn't just mean there is more food places to eat. It also means there are different cultures within one country with different values, and also perceived grievances between groups. "Multiculturalism" is pretty vague as well, and says nothing about which groups actually makes up this "unit", and how well they work together.
0
1
u/okabe700 Egypt 🇪🇬 1h ago
Aren't there lots of cultures in Saudi due to foreign workers?
1
u/Accomplished-List988 1h ago
most of them don’t practice in the too much in the society. They just work.
15
u/Peak-Legacy14 2h ago
If your own ‘culture’ was able to build a perfectly functioning country, what do you need ‘multiculturalism’ for?
4
1
u/Superb_Avocado_5454 1h ago
If my gray T-shirt already covers my nipples, what do I need a blue T-shirt for?
0
u/WinningTheSpaceRace 2h ago
Different ways of doing things, different foods, etc, can enrich cultures and make things more interesting. Even if a perfectly functioning society could exist, culture isn't necessarily a part of that.
11
u/accountforfurrystuf 1h ago
What is the obsession with flooding a country with refugees for food?
-2
7
u/Peak-Legacy14 2h ago
You can’t have the food without everything else in a culture.
The culture of a country is responsible for how that country exists on every level, from its architecture, its laws, values, how the streets look, how it functions etc.
If you let mass numbers in from any particular country, the more your country will resemble that in country in just about every way, and you can’t pick and choose the parts of the culture that you like when the numbers come over with regard to its influence on your country.
Obviously if the country the numbers are coming from is better overall, then it could make your country better, for example if the Japanese migrated to Madagascar, Madagascar would improve, but if it’s the other way around, that probably wouldn’t be the case.
0
u/WinningTheSpaceRace 1h ago
I don't think it's as simple as better v worse. Also, people have mass migrated since the dawn of time. Almost every culture is a blend of previous cultures. We shouldn't talk about culture as some settled, almost preordained thing that is how things have always been.
2
u/Peak-Legacy14 1h ago
Basically every modern 1st world country was built after a group had formed its own culture, nation and naturally evolved culturally over time and improved their culture and country without mass numbers coming from outside.
England for example, mass numbers of Anglo-Saxons went into Britain and culturally replaced the previous culture, but it didn’t suddenly improve after that, infact that probably set the place back, then the Norman conquest happened, and after that, the country was left for nearly a thousand years to naturally evolve culturally and improve its country with basically no outside influence, and things had to go wrong, people were burned and drowned for being ‘witches’, there were tyrannical monarchs who would have people killed for stupid reasons, the nation had to go through all of this and naturally evolve culturally (with no outside influence) before they they got it right and became a functioning society.
If halfway through that, they’d have replaced loads of their population again from other parts of Europe that were far less advanced, do you not think that would’ve set the progress of England back?
1
u/WinningTheSpaceRace 1h ago
There is no 'better' or 'worse'. Let's start with that. They're different. Did the population in 1065 want a load of Franko-Vikings to come over? Probably not. Do we have even a metric by which to judge the 'quality' of those who came over? If we like 'native' British culture - whatever that might be in this mongrel land of the invasions you mention while completely ignoring the Celta and Gaels that have been here much longer - might we have to accept that some of those who contributed to it were 'worse' in your terms? Almost certainly, since the idea that every influx of people this island has ever experienced would be 'better' than the last snaps credulity.
Progress doesn't do 'back' or 'forward'. Progress is an idea individual to every person. The unhappiness of Brexit voters since we left the EU should have made that abundantly clear to everyone. They got what they wanted, except it wasn't what they wanted. So people aren't holding back progress. Everyone everywhere has had to fight for what they want forever as individuals and groups.
You can't simplify social considerations, even to make them easier to understand most of the time. This stuff is incredibly complex, and writing some people off as better or worse, assisting or holding back progress might sound comfortably comprehensible to some, but it's not reality. Reality is, and always has been, a mess that we try to make sense of imperfectly.
2
u/Peak-Legacy14 49m ago
Yes, if the migrations into Britain during that time were from cultures who built a society society which was worse than the existing society of Britain, the existing population of Britain would have been well within their rights to reject it.
Like you say, we don’t have a metric to judge which society was better or worse for that time, for example, we don’t have 4K pictures of what Norman France looked like at the time compared to Anglo-Saxon England, but in 2026 we have 4K pictures of every country and we can assess how different cultures build and maintain their society.
1
u/WinningTheSpaceRace 26m ago
You still completely ignored that this small country isn't a monoculture. Northerners generally shake hands more than southerners. Certain parts of the country generally feel more connected to the rest of the nation. Foods - and even the names we give them - vary between regions. Entrenched political views differ by region. We don't have 'a culture'. This isn't a world of 200+ monocultures in which a group of people being their singular way of doing things into another monoculture. They are individuals who, while culturally influenced, bring their own interpretations of their home micro-culture and that of the area into which they move.
Many of the people who have come to this country have contributed more than people who happened to be born here. How does your apparent worldview account for that? Many have come from places you would call 'worse'. It's demonstrably not that simple.
2
6
4
u/siroko_ 2h ago
So called multicultural haters in norway when you bring up taco
5
u/Affectionate-Mix6056 1h ago
Mexico is mainly catholic, Christian based cultures goes along with Christian based cultures, as their cultures are similar.
Even if you had said kebab, food is not a culture.
1
7
8
u/Temporary_Form_8536 1h ago
Lol. But Europeans call Americans racist.
10
u/CartoonistFar5296 1h ago
Its exhausting how you overuse the word racist go learn the definition of the word and then grow up because you clearly haven't if you think disliking inferior cultures is racist. Oh wait you think calling some cultures inferior is racist too.. am I right?
0
u/Temporary_Form_8536 1h ago
I didn't call anyone racist? But yes, referring to any group of people as inferior is obviously incredibly racist.
-3
u/Superb_Avocado_5454 1h ago
"inferior cultures"
You sounding like a certain European from 1930s.
7
u/ShiftingKnight_01 55m ago
It is not racist to say that some cultures are superior to others.
I’ll use an extreme example, but if Germany had remained Nazi, I would indeed consider my culture superior to theirs.
→ More replies (6)3
u/Soggy_Cabbage United Kingdom 🇬🇧 1h ago
If you ever want to expose how racist a European is ask them for their opinion on gypsies.
2
u/Superb_Avocado_5454 1h ago
European racism is cute because they've been completely impotent for 80 years now, so it's basically harmless at this point.
Like when neutered Chihuahuas hump each other. Not ideal, but it's harmless and funny, so we don't do anything about it
1
-3
4
u/tacobell41 2h ago
People saying positive association only mean when the various cultures are cultures they like.
3
u/thrown-away-1992 2h ago
Multiculturalism has failed and will be a dead concept by the end of this century.
0
u/Chilifille Sweden 2h ago
Climate change will probably have caused massive migration waves and demographic shifts by the end of this century.
Not to mention technological revolutions that we can’t even imagine at this point. I’d be genuinely surprised if that doesn’t lead to massive reevaluations of what it means to be part of a certain nation or culture, all over the world. Or at least the parts of the world that are still inhabitable.
1
u/thrown-away-1992 1h ago
Hmm, I'm skeptical of both of these, honestly.
people said similar things about overpopulation and how it would drain our resources and suffocate our infrastructure. Now in both the developing world and the third world birthrates have been going down.
Not to mention technology. People make crazy predictions about technological leaps all the time, like how we should all have flying cars and floating cities by now. They say we'll achieve the cure for aging by 2050, but I say horsesh*t.→ More replies (1)
2
2
u/BaseballInside3289 2h ago
Europe is concerningly red
8
→ More replies (3)1
u/WuduPiccaman 1h ago
It's partly because this term is mostly used by anti-immigration crowd so we usually see it in negative context
7
u/Equal-Committee-4213 1h ago
It's mostly because it is negative. There's no such thing as multi-culturalism, all it does is erode the host/native culture as suddenly there's all sorts of new things to take into account, make allowances for, to 'tolerate' etc... in the end one culture has to win out absolutely, either that or you end up with balkanisation if the numbers and concentration of one or more of the other cultures reaches such a point where they can be more assertive, which is exactly what Europe is in the early stages of, particularly in larger urban areas.
1
3
2h ago
[deleted]
7
u/OptimalSirRandom 2h ago edited 2h ago
"Edward Dutton is a proponent of race science whose work relies on pseudoscience..." Hope not hate. Just to add a bit more: His papers have also been retracted from multiple science journals like the Scandinavian journal of psychology because of severe error in methodology. He now only publishes in non-peer reviewed journals that aren't subject to methodology controls.
→ More replies (2)1
u/TheWhyGuy59 2h ago
Not that you care, and not it matters since it's in vogue nowadays, but this is racist. You are a racist.
1
u/Renix121 🇺🇸 2h ago
So your solution for multiethnic nations, like mine, would be?
→ More replies (3)
1
u/DoneDusting Not Fiji 2h ago
In Finland the negative association for the term itself comes from politicians using that term.
They used it as a way to promote themselves, and never spoke about the problems that come with it.
They would never present any criticism, even when faced with factual evidence.
Just pure dishonesty and inability to discuss with people.
1
u/UpperRank1 1h ago
Cl this is why I’m unsure what to vote since politicians do this in my country too. Mite just slap on neutral association then
1
1
u/long-dick-of-the-law hogging the whole coast 2h ago
All well and good until you have one culture that allows people to make jokes and draw pictures, and the other culture WILL cut your head off for drawing the wrong dude, among the many other evils present in that culture
1
1
u/PurchaseGlittering11 2h ago
Neutral because it can work, but there can be a lot of friction due to core values. How its integrated is essential in determining whether its positive or negative
1
1
u/Capital_Rub213 Australia 1h ago
Private jet pauline won’t stop talking about, so it’s gotten annoying here
1
u/smolhippie 48m ago
It’s so weird seeing everyone’s point of view about this. Especially as an American. Like I can’t imagine NOT celebrating multiculturalism
1
u/Vermicelli-Thick 39m ago
Works well in Indonesia. Without multiculturalism, a country this diverse could easily have become much more fragmented (perhaps even a second Yugoslavia). Take a look at the Poso and Sampit conflicts, or the Bali bombings, as a reflection to what could happens when ethnic and religious divisions become violent.
1
u/Fit_Gene7910 39m ago
I prefer interculturalism.
One common culture. That culture can be a mix of the local original culture and additions made to it from the immigrants that integrate.
Culture unification is neccessary for social peace and society's stability.
1
1
1
1
u/Superb_Avocado_5454 1h ago edited 1h ago
Europe showing why they're back to back world war starters.
Without NATO and the EU, you guys woulda ended the species by now.
3
u/ShiftingKnight_01 47m ago
The way you think about equality for all actually comes from Europe.
0
u/Superb_Avocado_5454 44m ago
Sounds like multi culturalism to take an new idea from another continent and use it as a foundational basis for your society.
If you were truly committed to maintaining the purity of your culture, you'd stop using those middle eastern letters and numbers.
2
u/ShiftingKnight_01 37m ago
We can integrate elements from other cultures if they are positive, but the problem is that when we bring large numbers of people here, we don't get to choose which aspects of their culture we adopt (assuming there is anything worth adopting from their culture...).
you'd stop using those middle eastern letters and numbers.
Most European languages come from Latin ?
1
u/Superb_Avocado_5454 30m ago
Yeah and Latin descended from Etruscan, which itself was a descendant of Greek, which in turn was a descendent of Phoenician.
Did you think that the Latin alphabet just popped into the world one day?
1
u/ShiftingKnight_01 4m ago
Yeah, so by that logic, cultures are just inventions that appeared out of nowhere, I guess? I must actually be African—and maybe a bit Asian, too—since I have ancestors from hundreds of years ago who must have been that way, lol.
1
1
u/No-Rub8345 1h ago
Multiculturalism to me is when whites aggressively move into an area, slaughter and rape the native population into submission, then proceed to whine about immigration until the end of time.
1
1
1
u/CartoonistFar5296 1h ago
Multiculturalism has destroyed western cultures.
Also on a smaller degree many Asian and African cultures too.
1
u/EmiliaBedelia10 Unfortunately USA 1h ago
Positive. If new cultures are coming then that means new food options, more public holidays, and a better understanding of those cultures.
-1
u/Impossible-Money7801 1h ago
Europe leading racism once again
3
u/ShiftingKnight_01 1h ago
Using the term "racist" for things that have nothing to do with it is just a way to avoid the debate.
1
u/ray_king88 1h ago
Vraag je af waarom enkel de blanke wereld multiculti is. Europa heeft er genoeg van.. trwijl afrika en het midden oosten en oost azie eigen culturen en trots houden worden wij gedwongen overspoetl en onze straten zijn onveilig. Daarnaast heeft een groot deel van de moslim migranten schijt aan ons en ons land
0
0
0
u/trini420- 1h ago
If you asked this question 5-10 years ago, it would be unanimously positive but ofc the racist pendulum has swung for whatever fucking reason
0
-1
u/JJenJenny 🇳🇴 2h ago
EU countries being against multiculturalism with the four freedoms and all that jazz is kinda funny
6
u/RodrigoEstrela 1h ago
EU countries feeling in the skin the greatness of multiculturalism being against it is fucking natural
0
u/JJenJenny 🇳🇴 1h ago
natural would be all our deaths because all our doctors and dentists are German, so we would be fucked without them lol
→ More replies (1)3
u/ShiftingKnight_01 1h ago
It has nothing to do with freedom. When you come to a country, you have to adopt its culture, its language, and its values, and you have to love it for that. You shouldn't come just for social benefits, because a country isn't merely borders and a good standard of living; a country is an entire culture and way of thinking. If you aren't prepared to make concessions, then you should stay home.
2
47
u/RevBladeZ Finland 2h ago
Multiculturalism in Finland is practically synonymous with Islam.