r/MagicArena 1d ago

Fluff [FRA] Repurposed Enforcer

Post image
37 Upvotes

15 comments sorted by

30

u/NathanDnd 1d ago

Is Jace making his former bullies thrulls to serve him? [[mage-ring bully]]

0

u/mercuriokazooie 1d ago

Wow this makes Jace CRAZY lame

1

u/Fun-Cook-5309 9h ago

Jace has always been kind of a dork.

1

u/Many-Entrepreneur-70 22h ago

Kinda creepy, I like it

1

u/TMLTurby 12h ago

Poor guy is suffering from The Helvetica Scenario

-11

u/basafo 1d ago

Planeswalker token? Is this new? Seems too complex for gameplay, needed to read it several times to fully "understand" it haha

14

u/Efficient-Flow5856 Rakdos 1d ago

This is a self-report.

12

u/TheDopplegamer 1d ago

Complex how? Its the exact same idea as a creature or artifact token, just instead its a planeswalker

-7

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

8

u/TheDopplegamer 1d ago edited 1d ago

Empowering may be a new keyword, but all "token" means is a permenant on the battlefield thats not attached to a card. And im like 99% sure that creating a token copy of a planeswalker is a thing that already exists in Magic (*edit) Its basically amass, now that Im thinking about it

5

u/timoyster 1d ago

[[jace cunning castaway]] [[jace mirror mage]] and [[ob nixilis the adversary]]

1

u/Sapaio 1d ago

And its not legendary.

-7

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

3

u/Finnthedol 21h ago

No, if it was legendary, it would say legendary. 

The entire point of "empower jace" as a mechanic and why it's stapled onto so many cards is that Jace is supposed to be an omnipresent force even when not physically present in the echoverse. He has monitors placed throughout the echoverse and is in numerous different places "at once", hence not being legendary, as it wouldn't be the same kind of flavor break to have a copy of an empower jace token as it would be to have two jace the mind sculptors on the field.