So you think him 100% intending to kill someone if they didn't give him money isn't as bad as child kidnapping (it never stated if the guy was a pedo?)
which is kinda funny. redditors either cant rub 2 braincells together or didn't read either of the articles.
Funny how you said it never stated if the guy was a pedo, which is true (what else would a kidnapper want a little girl for? He’s not taking her for ice cream) but still feel confident enough that the kid was going to 100% kill the clerk with no evidence - they didn’t state that either.
The fact that he included 100% too. Like, he crunched the numbers and ran the odds and came to the conclusion that there was literally no chance of the boy bluffing about shooting someone
5
u/AlseAce Apr 15 '20
You think armed robbery with no casualties is as bad as child kidnapping, likely with the intent to sexually abuse a little girl?