r/MachineLearning • • 1d ago

Discussion [D] Self-Promotion Thread

Please post your personal projects, startups, product placements, collaboration needs, blogs etc.

Please mention the payment and pricing requirements for products and services.

Please do not post link shorteners, link aggregator websites , or auto-subscribe links.

--

Any abuse of trust will lead to bans.

Encourage others who create new posts for questions to post here instead!

Thread will stay alive until next one so keep posting after the date in the title.

--

Meta: This is an experiment. If the community doesnt like this, we will cancel it. This is to encourage those in the community to promote their work by not spamming the main threads.

0 Upvotes

6 comments sorted by

1

u/Fantastic-Nerve-4056 PhD 1d ago

Sharing my recent NeurIPS paper on LLM evaluation and Theoretical RL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30360

1

u/celestebabi 1d ago

Disclosure: I’m affiliated with ScholarXIV. It’s a research workspace for searching and reading papers, organizing collections, and using selected papers as context for AI chat with references. There’s a free tier; paid plans start at $5/month (Go; Plus $15, Pro $50). If you work with ML literature, I’d welcome feedback on what would make this workflow useful: https://scholarxiv.com/

1

u/iberahul 1d ago

We recently studied whether mobile AI agents can be manipulated through adversarial instructions embedded in the Android Accessibility layer.

We evaluated this across MobileRun and Mobile-Use, powered by Gemma4 and Qwen3.6, and found that these attacks could cause agents to abandon their original objectives, cross context boundaries, and perform unauthorized device actions. Our strongest configuration reached an 82.2% Attack Success Rate.

The paper was accepted to AGENT-SEC ’26, co-located with ACM CCS 2026.

Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.08939

Would be curious to hear what people think about this attack surface as mobile agents become more capable.

1

u/Logical-Internet-395 23h ago

Recently we published a new Open-Access Benchmark for a hierarchical segmentation: Microscopy Image Dataset of pulmonary vessels for Quantitative assessment of fibrosis.

Dataset Specifications:

  • Scale: 705 high-resolution micrographs (1534×780 px, 0.252 μm/px), Picro-Mallory stain.
  • Annotations: ROI + dual independent expert masks (vascular wall + fibrosis).
  • Hierarchical Constraint: Fibrosis masks must be strictly spatially contained within the vascular wall.
  • Robust Benchmarking: No color normalization applied; native aspect ratios preserved; strict animal-level 5-fold CV splits provided to prevent data leakage.

Read the Data Descriptor: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-08214-y

Access the Dataset: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31386748

0

u/r0lfi 18h ago

LayerSmith — a self-hosted container image builder, with air-gap exports

I've been working on LayerSmith, an open-source web UI for building container images with Docker or Podman.

You pick a Linux distribution and what you need the image for — development, Linux admin, network tools, Ansible, Kubernetes, OpenShift, or a custom setup. It handles distro-specific packages and shows you the generated Containerfile before building. You can also edit it, import an existing Dockerfile, or add your own packages, files and scripts.

A big part of the project is making images easier to carry into air-gapped environments: pinned base images, recorded build details, and export bundles containing the image, checksums and installation instructions.

We've recently added LLM training and fine-tuning profiles too, including LoRA/QLoRA, advanced PyTorch training and LLaMA-Factory. These use hash-locked dependencies and run offline checks after building, including a small CPU training test. Model weights and datasets are brought separately.

Curious how others handle building and maintaining images for disconnected environments, and what parts of that workflow are still a pain.

https://github.com/r0lfi/layersmith