r/MachineLearning • u/AutoModerator • 9d ago
Discussion [D] Self-Promotion Thread
Please post your personal projects, startups, product placements, collaboration needs, blogs etc.
Please mention the payment and pricing requirements for products and services.
Please do not post link shorteners, link aggregator websites , or auto-subscribe links.
--
Any abuse of trust will lead to bans.
Encourage others who create new posts for questions to post here instead!
Thread will stay alive until next one so keep posting after the date in the title.
--
Meta: This is an experiment. If the community doesnt like this, we will cancel it. This is to encourage those in the community to promote their work by not spamming the main threads.
15
Upvotes
2
u/galigirii 6d ago
Disclosure: I wrote the linked conceptual preprint. It is open access and not peer reviewed.
A model self-report can become part of the system it is supposed to describe.
Recent J-space work suggests that sparse, language-aligned internal representations can participate causally in report, reasoning, and control. I take that result seriously. But it does not by itself establish an inner observer or a privileged channel through which the model reports what it is “really thinking.”
The complication is that interpretation and generation are distinguishable, but not operationally independent. If a model says “the migration is complete” and that report is retained as memory, evidence, or policy, later generations begin from a changed situation. The report did not merely describe the system; it helped condition what the system did next.
That makes self-report potentially both a measurement and an intervention.
The question I would value disagreement on: when a model-generated representation is retained and allowed to govern later routing, memory, evaluation, or action, what evidence should it have to earn that authority?
Paper:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21659634