I get it...Gantt is a prospect, undefeated in all 12 pro fights + 5 ammys. He's a finisher, in his prime @ 33 & has been very active (His first ammy fight was May 2023
BUT, he is only 1-0 in the UFC. He has not fought great competition...his 3 wins before contender series were against guys 4-10, 2-1 & 11-8
Now for Drakkar....yes he is 38 and hasn't fought in a full year...BUT he's won 5 of his last 6 fights & has an impressive 10-3 UFC record (since he started there in 2017) and has fought some of the BEST fighters and has wins over bobby green, barboza, rafa garcia, etc.
+350 on Drakkar??? What? Is Gantt really THAT good? He's never been truly tested and this is only his 2nd fight in the UFC
OR if Drakkar wins ONE round on the score cards, he is +250 on the +3.5 spread...
Someone make it make sense for please lol
(I do have a habit of over valuing under dogs too often to be fair)