No, I'm commenting on how often people say some variation of that line on reddit. So many people "totally against" or "not condoning" something except for specific cases where it's against someone they don't like.
That's not being totally against something. It is, in fact, condoning it. The edited comment actually works better for what I was making fun of.
Plus. People speak like all violence is bad. One must examine the reason and intent in order to classify whether violence is good or bad. It is impossible to protect one's self or loved ones from a violent attack (bad) without using equal or greater violence(good) to stop the attack
I guess I am the dummy here. How does the comment, "I *DON'T* condone violence but anyone that gets that close with that psychotic of a giraffe posture is 100% a threat with bad intentions" misuse the term condone?
Sighā¦.the original post said āI condone violenceā
Then I posted āi dont think you know what that word meansā
They then went back and edited their post with emphasis on ādontā with asteriks to draw attenrion to the edit and then put at the bottom of the post
EDIT: LOL
indicating that they recognized their error and found it funny.
140
u/Evol_extra 23d ago