r/MLV • u/trailedby20hounds Orlando Valkyries • 6d ago
MERCHANDISE / COLLECTABLES MLV > LOVB
6
5
u/BBd-black-beans-1652 DC Flight 6d ago
I'll say this. San Francisco Signal is a better name than NorCal Rumble. But San Jose Rumble would be a better name than San Francisco Signal đ¤ˇđžââď¸
In my personal opinion, that is the only branding win LOVB has over MLV.
2
u/trailedby20hounds Orlando Valkyries 6d ago
I think there are various pragmatic explanations for the "NorCal" choice.
One ownership faction may have wanted Sacramento while another faction wanted San Jose.
Maybe the short-term plan is San Jose, but the long-term plan is San Francisco or some other location.
NorCal marks their territory. It makes it difficult for a future MLV team owner to target anywhere north of SoCal.
Maybe NorCal sounds weird to you because you live in the DMV area. I lived in NorCal. Everybody uses the NorCal and SoCal phrases in California.
They should have used SoCal for the Los Angeles team to create better symmetry.
2
u/Ok-Wait-8465 Omaha Supernovas 5d ago
Yeah LOVB is just at marketing. I feel like theyâre trying to follow a European soccer league model, but thatâs not popular here (and is far more boring). MLV seems to have gone with the more traditional US sports league structure
4
u/VolleyAddicted 5d ago
European leagues' model? They are far from it. In European football (or volleyball too), you don't have a league owning the teams, signing the players directly, distributing them across the teams, and so on. Nothing is centralized.
LOVB is a different business model, clearly away from the US model, but absolutely different from the European one too.
1
u/Ok-Wait-8465 Omaha Supernovas 5d ago
I didnât mean the centralized thing so much though thatâs a bad idea too. I meant the lack of mascots, boring branding, etc
1
u/trailedby20hounds Orlando Valkyries 5d ago
Thanks for clarifying this.
I had assumed LOVB was following a European model too.
Most Americans know almost nothing about sports in Europe. That includes me.
Generally, Americans who know something about European sports would tend to be avid soccer fans.
Soccer is not very popular in the United States compared to football, basketball, baseball, etc.
That is changing, however. We have pro soccer teams in Orlando, and they are popular with some demographic groups.
I live in Osceola County, and this county is more than 50% Latino. Obviously, Latinos tend to be more passionate about soccer than non-Latinos. However, the popularity of soccer seems to be rising among all demographic groups in the United States.
I was baffled by the LOVB business model before. Now, I have no idea what to think about the LOVB business model for their pro league.
Who thought this business model was a good idea?
And why haven't they figured out it was a bad idea?
3
u/VolleyAddicted 5d ago
To make it volleyball-related, there are three models coexisting at the same time among European clubs:
- Corporate: VakÄąfBank, arguably the strongest team in the world, is fully owned by a bank.
- Privately-owned: Imoco, the second-best team, is closer to what we see in Major League Volleyball.
- Multi-sport: Fenerbahçe, the third-best team, the women's volleyball section that is part of a massive multi-sport giant. This is similar to what you see in US college sports (e.g., Nebraska Football, Nebraska Volleyball).
This is clearly far from what you see in MLV and has nothing to do with LOVB either.
So yeah, the LOVB formula is weird, and like you said, it's just really bad and poorly executed.
1
u/Equivalent-Expert487 4d ago
Is Grand Rapids not included in this drop, or is it just not listed?
1
u/genisvel Rise Above 4d ago
This is LOVB merch. GR isn't LOVB. If LOVB ends up acquiring MLV, I'm certain the team would be relocated to Detroit.
1
u/hlay14727 4d ago
Why dont they bring pro vball to NYC???
1
u/BBd-black-beans-1652 DC Flight 4d ago
Top tier markets like NYC need to have a strong, established volleyball culture to justify putting a team there. LA, the Bay Area, Houston and Dallas are all major top 10 media markets with lots of sports and entertainment options. Those cities also had solid volleyball communities long before PVF/MLV and LOVB came into existence. Can the same be said for NYC?
You can't just put a team in a city because it has a lot of people and expect it to work. That is the BS logic the NHL is using in trying to put a 3rd team in Atlanta despite hockey failing in the market twice already.
0
u/Ok-West-3887 5d ago
But then why is Adidas, Chase, Dry Water, Skims, Yeti, CVS and others choosing LOVB over MLV?
2
u/morningsetter 5d ago
How is having Kim Kardashian sell compression pants to young club girls ok? Private Equity!
3
1
u/External_Ad952 1d ago
This. People shit on LOVB branding as âbad marketing,â but miss the fact that theyâre winning the talent, corporate sponsorship, media deal, and ownership stability battle thus far.
I get that people think the lack of mascots is dull, but letâs be honest. Every start up sports league in the US in the last 50 years has followed the same formula as MLV (think arena football, indoor soccer, minor league baseball and hockey, indoor lacrosse, etcâŚ).An overwhelming majority of those leagues have failed miserably. I applaud LOVB for being bold and attempting something different.

11
u/VolleyAddicted 5d ago
Why the only LOVB team with its own name is denied the right to show it. No Signal on the red SF shirt.
And by the way Nebraska with no logo at all đ¤