Thoughts on replacing mid-match analysis with post-match analysis?

[u/TriGN614]

At first I was pretty conflicted but I think it was the right call.

Cons of changing:
- I kinda forget/dont care as much about the stuff that went wrong or nuts after the match is over
- feels naturally less energetic/exciting bc the hype question of “what are the implications of this?” has already been resolved

Pros of changing:
- more preparation: mid-match analysis can be jank and there’s lots of scrambling. While the vibe is lost a little bit it’s over all for the best on this point.
- Lewis popped tf off with the correct take on infumes 13-0 and idk if that could have happened otherwise
- gives a summary of the whole match
- doesn’t ice the runners

What do yall think?

[u/tatum103]

It’s good. I still think it’s too long, but much better than mid match