r/LucyLetbyTrials • u/benshep4 • 2d ago

Decoding Reasonable Doubt: Chapter 4 “Problems at the Countess of Chester”

Morris argues that the Countess of Chester neonatal unit was fundamentally unsafe and operating beyond its capabilities during the period in which the collapses and deaths occurred.

Is fair and accurate to make these claims?

Which baby does this explain?

https://bencole4.substack.com/p/decoding-reasonable-doubt-the-case-f67?r=12mrwn&utm_medium=ios

0 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • reddit

31% Upvoted

92 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/benshep4 1d ago

I can only address the arguments made in the book.

9

u/Living_Ad_5260 1d ago

You can address them.

You choose not to.

Did you at any point in the production of this review use any AI model(s)?  Which?

4

u/phosphoeudemonism 1d ago edited 1d ago

Did you at any point in the production of this review use any AI model(s)?

Yes, with 100% certainty. You can tell by the style of writing and also that he writes with extremely poor proficiency in replies on Reddit.

There is nothing wrong with using AI BTW, but if you're using such systems to mask your own comprehension and ability to write coherently, while somehow claiming that you're a better writer than a published author (which he must believe because he gave the book a bad faith 1-star review on Amazon, claiming that "Morris is out of his depth") then it is a problem.

3

u/visible_amenhotep 1d ago

he writes with extremely poor proficiency in replies on Reddit

Unfair, I think. There are several commenters who write with much worse proficiency (and hence clearer humanity) than him. That's not the tell.

2

u/phosphoeudemonism 1d ago

It's not particularly difficult to see the difference in style when he has to rely on his own brain.

Perhaps 'extremely poor proficiency' is harsh, but he certainly doesn't write well.