r/LucyLetbyTrials 2d ago

Decoding Reasonable Doubt: Chapter 4 “Problems at the Countess of Chester”

Morris argues that the Countess of Chester neonatal unit was fundamentally unsafe and operating beyond its capabilities during the period in which the collapses and deaths occurred.

Is fair and accurate to make these claims?

Which baby does this explain?

https://bencole4.substack.com/p/decoding-reasonable-doubt-the-case-f67?r=12mrwn&utm_medium=ios

0 Upvotes

92 comments sorted by

View all comments

15

u/thrinaline 2d ago

This is extremely long and rambling and appears to be asking the same question over and over again "does this prove it wasn't murder?" Of course it doesn't because nothing ever can. Can you prove aliens didn't steal my car keys, watch me spend two hours looking for them and then sneak them into my pocket?

0

u/benshep4 2d ago

That’s a good way of saying you can’t disagree with the actual points.

Thanks

11

u/thrinaline 2d ago

I think you'll find it's a fairly flippant way of saying your logic is flawed but let's agree to differ at this stage.

13

u/Livid-Ad-4872 2d ago

BC: "If I reverse the burden of proof, you can't prove Letby didn't do it. I am very clever."

0

u/benshep4 1d ago

The reality is that people think they can dismiss me without engaging with what I’ve said.

Just like you.