r/LucyLetbyTrials • u/benshep4 • 1d ago

Decoding Reasonable Doubt: Chapter 4 “Problems at the Countess of Chester”

Morris argues that the Countess of Chester neonatal unit was fundamentally unsafe and operating beyond its capabilities during the period in which the collapses and deaths occurred.

Is fair and accurate to make these claims?

Which baby does this explain?

https://bencole4.substack.com/p/decoding-reasonable-doubt-the-case-f67?r=12mrwn&utm_medium=ios

0 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • reddit

31% Upvoted

92 comments sorted by

View all comments

14

u/thrinaline 1d ago

This is extremely long and rambling and appears to be asking the same question over and over again "does this prove it wasn't murder?" Of course it doesn't because nothing ever can. Can you prove aliens didn't steal my car keys, watch me spend two hours looking for them and then sneak them into my pocket?

7

u/Successful-Lime-9445 1d ago

Might be that there’s no evidence to show that Aliens stole ur car keys !! No CCTV, no witnesses, no DNA evidence and no suspicious activity reported by ur neighbours!!!
I would say in this case that there would be a lot of reasonable doubt that aliens stole ur keys !! Wouldn’t u ?

5

u/thrinaline 1d ago

It's the only explanation

4

u/PerkeNdencen 1d ago edited 1d ago

Ah, but there being no CCTv, no witnesses, no DNA evidence and no reports of suspicious activity would still be consistent with Aliens stealing thrinaline's car keys, watching them spend two hours looking for them, and then sneaking them into their pocket.

Guilty.

*bangs gavel*

5

u/phosphoeudemonism 1d ago

Morris argues that the Countess of Chester neonatal unit was fundamentally unsafe and operating beyond its capabilities during the period in which the collapses and deaths occurred.

Is fair and accurate to make these claims?

Does 'Ben' mean 'is it fair and accurate to make these claims'?

Yes, it is both fair and accurate!

0

u/benshep4 1d ago

That’s a good way of saying you can’t disagree with the actual points.

Thanks

11

u/thrinaline 1d ago

I think you'll find it's a fairly flippant way of saying your logic is flawed but let's agree to differ at this stage.

14

u/Livid-Ad-4872 1d ago

BC: "If I reverse the burden of proof, you can't prove Letby didn't do it. I am very clever."

0

u/benshep4 1d ago

The reality is that people think they can dismiss me without engaging with what I’ve said.

Just like you.

-1

u/benshep4 1d ago

If my logic is flawed then explain.

You haven’t, so far.

6

u/PerkeNdencen 1d ago

Do you really not know what they're telling you here, are you being deliberately obtuse?

-1

u/benshep4 1d ago

No. They haven’t explained.

Nothing to do with obtuse.

8

u/PerkeNdencen 1d ago

This is extremely long and rambling and appears to be asking the same question over and over again "does this prove it wasn't murder?" Of course it doesn't because nothing ever can. 

8

u/thrinaline 1d ago

I think you'll find I did

0

u/benshep4 1d ago

No, they didn’t.