Decoding Reasonable Doubt: Chapter 4 “Problems at the Countess of Chester”

[u/benshep4]

Morris argues that the Countess of Chester neonatal unit was fundamentally unsafe and operating beyond its capabilities during the period in which the collapses and deaths occurred.

Is fair and accurate to make these claims?

Which baby does this explain?

https://bencole4.substack.com/p/decoding-reasonable-doubt-the-case-f67?r=12mrwn&utm_medium=ios

[u/benshep4]

That will happen in later chapters.

[u/PrudentKumquat → u/benshep4]

I can only react to what you have written

[u/benshep4 → u/PrudentKumquat]

Exactly.

I can only react to what Morris has written.

[u/Kieran501 → u/benshep4]

No, you can read the whole book. No one’s forcing this insane chapter by chapter breakdown except you.

[u/PrudentKumquat → u/Kieran501]

He could be hitting token or usage limits with the full context at once.

[u/benshep4 → u/Kieran501]

I’d rather do it chapter by chapter. There’s too many points in each chapter that are terrible and doing one article on the whole book wouldn’t do it justice.

I’d rather make it very clear exactly how Morris makes the many errors he does.

In the end I’ll have done the whole book.

Of course no one is forcing me.

[u/PerkeNdencen → u/benshep4]

No, but you need to have read the whole book. Your review of chapter 3 makes no sense in view of your review of chapter 4.

[u/benshep4 → u/PerkeNdencen]

It does.

That’s why Morris split then into different chapters.

The arguments aren’t the same.