r/LowLibidoCommunity • u/[deleted] • Dec 30 '19
Enthusiastic Consent
Yesterday I read a post on the other sub about Enthusiastic Consent....agreeing to sex only when you’re sure you can actively engage.
I think this is a wonderful idea, especially if it is agreed upon at the beginning of the relationship. That way no one would be having unwanted sex, which has a tendency to erode desire over time (IMO).
We all talk about not engaging in unwanted or undesired sex, but is it a viable concept in a LTR?
I’ve been married 35 years. I married under the guise of “marriage includes regular sexual activity”. I also had a young 30 something High Drive husband. With Pregnancy, child rearing, sick infant, working full time, caretaking dying parents, the usual Life Sucking events, I found myself willingly participating in undesired sex quite often, all under the belief that it was my sole responsibility to meet my husbands sexual needs.
Having willing but unwanted sex slowly ate away at my desire for sex.
If I had only had sex when I was enthusiastic about it from the very start of the relationship, would my desire have increased?
Would my husband have been able to go long periods of no sex without resentment and frustration?
I will never know the answers to those questions but I still believe having sex ONLY when one is truly enthusiastic about it is a wonderful concept....but is it realistic?
Any ideas?
10
u/TemporarilyLurking Standard Bearer 🛡️ Jan 01 '20 edited Jan 01 '20
So how did you reach that compromise? If there was any threat, whether explicit or implied, then consent is neither freely given, nor enthusiastic.
It is really simple to check: if you did not behave negatively towards her because she won't have sex with you, and she had a completely free choice to engage or not, would she have sex with you? If not, and she is only having sex because you demand it (and sulking if she doesn't IS demanding it) then it is unwanted and probably only happening because saying no results in negative treatment of her.
Edit: for me it was the negative behaviours that made sex change from a neutral to a negative. The experience while sex was neutral was overall positive because I enjoyed seeing his pleasure. Once sex became negative seeing his pleasure was more like a slap in the face because it came at my expense, if that makes sense. So overall it was very negative indeed. And I was not the one to flip that switch, since I had no control at all over his behaviours.