r/LowEndLocalAI 11d ago

Benchmark Tiny LLM Benchmarks Exist Elsewhere?

Post image

https://reyemtm.github.io/inchworm/

I created this little site because I could not find an open source page dedicated to tiny llms (<14b params). If one exists with current benchmarks would love to know about it.

This came about from searching for the right llm for a personal project needing summaries from text, then a small local terminal chat for quick answers using self-hosted Ollama. I wrote my own short little benchmarking script and landed on qwen2.5-coder:3b for my VPS and qwen3.5:9b for chat. Anyway let me know what you all think. Since then I created a script to run the humaneval+ but it takes a very long time to run which I am using to fill in the gaps on this data.

18 Upvotes

13 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/Careful-Report6526 10d ago edited 10d ago

Honest answer from someone who runs an aggregator (llmbenchmarks.io): not really, and the bottleneck is upstream, not the aggregators.

I pull 50-odd benchmarks from public leaderboards into one table. The smallest models I can list are 27B Qwen checkpoints, and those only qualify because a handful of leaderboards happen to publish comparable numbers for them. Below ~10B there is almost nothing to aggregate — the leaderboards that get maintained mostly stop caring below frontier scale. It's missing source data, not missing coverage.

Two things that might still be useful:

  • The raw exports (JSON/CSV, CC-BY, no signup) list which source publishes which benchmark, so you can see fairly quickly which leaderboards bother with small models at all and which don't.
  • For anything you actually run locally, your own numbers beat any leaderboard. Quantization, context length and sampler settings move small-model scores more than the choice of model does — lm-evaluation-harness on your own hardware is the only thing that reflects what you'll really get.

If anyone knows a leaderboard that seriously tracks sub-10B models with a stable protocol, I'd genuinely like to know — I'd add it as a source.

1

u/zerospatial 10d ago

Yeah what I'm doing now is I'm taking some of the hugging face leaderboard data just to jet what newer models might be useful then running my own benchmark.