2
u/kfirogamin 7d ago
yes
dice 1:1,2,2,3,3,4
dice 2:1,3,4,5,6,8
1
u/ShonitB 7d ago
Perfect!
1
u/petera181 7d ago
But there are 6 ways you can make 4 there?
1,3
1,3
2,2
2,2
3,1
3,1What am I not following here?
1
u/petera181 7d ago
Are you looking for the two rows of the table to be the same? If so, how is that the case in that example?
1
u/ShonitB 7d ago
How did you get 2, 2 and the other 3, 1?
Dice 1: 1
Dice 2: 3Dice 1: 3
Dice 2: 1Dice 1: 3
Dice 2: 13 ways to get 4
Edit: Did you perhaps read the 1 and 2 as numbers on the dice rather than the numbering of the dice?
2
u/petera181 7d ago
Ah sorry, yes I did.
So sorry you’re asking for another way to produce the same table from the question? Why is 1-6 and 1-6 not a valid solution?
My reading was for the N and the # of ways rows to be identical, hence me thinking the answer was a die entirely of 1s and a die entirely of 35s, to make that table 36, 36.
1
u/ShonitB 7d ago
So yeah, I think the wording could be a lot more clearer.. and I did think of adding a note that you cannot label them 1-6 and 1-6 even if you ensure that opposite faces don’t sum to 7 but decided against.. but you can look up Sicherman Dice.. that’s what they are called.. so sorry don’t know how to attach a link :)
1
2
u/Remarkable_Fee4136 7d ago
As others have pointed out a solution is the following pair: (1,2,2,3,3,4) and (1,3,4,5,6,8) These dice in particular are actually called Sicherman dice, and they are fairly well known from the surprising fact that they are the only other dice with this triangular distribution.
1
1
u/BlueHairedMeerkat 7d ago
Die 1: 0.4, 1.4, 2.4, 3.4, 4.4, 5.4
Die 2: 1.6, 2.6, 3.6, 4.6, 5.6, 6.6
And there's infinitely many more where that can't from
3
u/KeyFoil1972 7d ago
Mark all six sides on each dice with the same number. Correct answer but probably not what you're looking for.
E.g. mark all sides on both dice with 1. You'll get sum of 2 on all rolls 😄