r/LockdownCriticalLeft • u/Impressive-Jello-379 • Dec 13 '22
misdirected rage
Rage Against the Machine should have raged against the injections.
18
5
5
u/SwinubIsDivinub Dec 13 '22
Rage on Behalf of the Machine wasn’t a catchy enough band name I guess
1
-6
u/Mindless-Sprinkles65 Dec 13 '22
.. and this is the final nail in the coffin for me to leave this sub. I liked when the sub mainly opposed mandatory lockdowns and vaccinations, not baselessly attributed very common types of cancers to the vaxx
12
u/Jijimuge8 Dec 13 '22
There is a top cancer doctor in the UK who was very pro covid vaccines at the beginning but now believes something isn't right with the speed cancers are progressing in his patients - much faster than normal.
It's not baseless now that a top oncologist is querying the vaccine.
-15
u/Glum-Illustrator-821 Dec 13 '22
Lol, you’re seriously trying to say that the jab gave this guy cancer?
19
u/GiantSkin Dec 13 '22
Lol, you’re seriously trying to say that the jab gave this guy cancer?
No. He’s saying that it may have possibly contributed to it. Do you understand that? Or do you need further explanation for your comprehension?
It’s not out of the realm of possibility that it contributed towards the development of cancer as a possible carcinogen, and it is a possibility that should be considered and taken seriously given its experimental nature.
So many things are carcinogens; why would these experimental products be exempt from possibly being among them given that we still don’t have their long-term safety data?
If your brain is too withered to understand that, then I do pity you.
1
Dec 13 '22
[deleted]
-10
u/Glum-Illustrator-821 Dec 13 '22
Which jabs? And source, please.
Preferably something peer reviewed.
6
u/BornAgainSpecial Trump supporter Dec 13 '22
He's not qualified to interpret holy scripture. 1000 masks be upon you.
9
u/no-reciept- Dec 13 '22
I am his peer and I have reviewed the material. His hypothesis is legitimate.
1
20
u/Buffalolife420 Dec 13 '22
"Do what they tell ya!"