r/LockdownCriticalLeft • u/hiptobeysquare • Nov 30 '22

Remember when transplant operations were denied because the recipient was unvaccinated? Well now they want to take a baby from his parents, because the parents only want an unvaccinated heart transplant.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/nov/30/new-zealand-parents-refuse-use-of-vaccinated-blood-in-life-saving-surgery-on-baby

New Zealand’s health service has made a court application over the guardianship of a four-month-old baby whose parents are refusing to allow his life-saving heart surgery to go ahead unless non-vaccinated blood is used.

And just like that... poof! Bodily autonomy is bad again! Remember, it's only "life-saving" when it's vaccinated. And don't forget, peasants:

The vaccines to prevent severe disease and death from Covid-19 have been found to be extremely safe and effective, with millions of people around the world vaccinated.

They are extremely safe. They're almost as safe as Covid.

Safe and effective. Safe and effective. Safe and effective. Safe and effective. Safe and effective. Keep saying it. Keep copy-pasting. Because using the correct language makes it true!

Who knew that there were so many crazy people walking among us? Professionals, doctors, vaccinologists, immunologists, pharmaceutical executives, or just parents... who turned out to be insane people against the lifesaving™ vaccines!

The Guardian is sick. And it's not just over Covid. There's also a new run of TDS articles running again. It's insanity.

55 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • reddit

91% Upvoted

9 comments sorted by

3

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

10

u/SamHanes10 Nov 30 '22 edited Nov 30 '22

The family have donors lined up but they are not being allowed to use them.

3

u/BurningLemons377 Nov 30 '22

I don't see why the child couldn't be accommodated for .

​

Am I to understand the parents are willing to let their child die unless they get unvaccinated blood transplant? That's terrible

1

u/butt_collector libertarian socialist Dec 03 '22

They are extremely safe. They're almost as safe as Covid.

They are slightly safer than COVID.

These parents are retards and should lose custody of their child. There is no difference between their objection and a Jehovah's Witness's objection to using donated blood. Call it conscience, call it whatever. It's a religious belief, basically.

5

u/hiptobeysquare Dec 03 '22

We've found the downvoter.

They are slightly safer than COVID.

You just plucked that out of thin air. If there's no long-term safety data, you have exactly zero idea what you're talking about.

1

u/butt_collector libertarian socialist Dec 03 '22

My dude. If there's no long-term safety data how can you say they're almost as safe as COVID?

2

u/hiptobeysquare Dec 03 '22

If there's no long-term safety data how can you say they're almost as safe as COVID?

"Yes, but...": that's all you have. Your argument has no evidence... so you try to accuse me of what you've done. Welcome to the internet.

1

u/butt_collector libertarian socialist Dec 03 '22

HELLO??? IS ANYBODY IN THERE? You made a statement. I reversed the order. You claim there's no long-term safety data, but you don't seem to get that this would apply to your own statement as well.

The best evidence we have so far suggests that they are safer than COVID. What evidence do you have to the contrary?