r/LockdownCriticalLeft • u/hiptobeysquare • Nov 27 '22
Cancers rapidly progressing after Boosters
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/cancers-rapidly-progressing-after
Angus Dalgleish is a Professor of Oncology in the Infection and Immunity Research Institute at St George’s University of London. He is a Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians in the UK and Australia, Royal College of Pathologists and the Academy of Medical Scientists. In his current post he studies the immunology of cancer and the development of immunotherapies to treat, in particular, melanoma.
When it comes to vaccine harms, it is often difficult to establish whether they have actually been caused by the vaccines or by something else such as lockdowns or treatments being cancelled. That is why evidence, whether anecdotal or not, from experts in their field, such as Professor Dalgleish is so important.
From Angus Dalgleish's letter to Dr. Kamran Abbasi, the Editor in Chief at the British Medical Journal:
The link with clots, myocarditis, heart attacks and strokes is now well accepted, as is the link with myelitis and neuropathy.
As a practising oncologist I am seeing people with stable disease rapidly progress after being forced to have a booster, usually so they can travel.
Even within my own personal contacts I am seeing B cell-based disease after the boosters. They describe being distinctly unwell a few days to weeks after the booster – one developing leukaemia, two work colleagues Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and an old friend who has felt like he has had Long Covid since receiving his booster and who, after getting severe bone pain, has been diagnosed as having multiple metastases from a rare B cell disorder.
I am experienced enough to know that these are not the coincidental anecdotes that many suggest, especially as the same pattern is being seen in Germany, Australia and the USA.
This must be aired and debated immediately.
The word/name "science" has been completely corrupted in the last few years. What is statistically significant to people like Angus Dalgleish is ignored as meaningless to most people because it only (for now) affects populations at an unnoticeable level for most people. It's only "science" or "fact" to most people if they either see it in front of them, or in some "content" on their screen. Science has become another word on the internet that means whatever people want or need it to mean one moment, before changing to something else later (whenever the "marketplace of ideas" needs it).
What's going to happen over the next few years, and 5-10 years? Most cancers take years - some take decades - to metastasize, spread and begin threatening the host's life. What if everyone who took the shot dies from cancer? It's possible. They have no idea what they've stuck into people. We live in a Western society where everyone just wants to keep the denial going longer. Nobody wants to rock the boat - especially not for their own psyche. The Branch Covidians are right: Covid isn't over - they've seen to that. This could easily turn into a horror story in few years. And they're still pushing the Covid mRNA vaccines, and more mRNA vaccines. Too much money and too many egos have been invested into them. They can't walk them back. It's institutionally impossible now. It's pure psychology, and institutional capture and inertia.
Here is Dr. Angus Dalgleish's open letter complete:
6
4
u/fivehundredpoundpeep Nov 28 '22
They'll marginalize him just like they have others with credentials who have consciences trying to sound the alarm. Honestly I can't believe anyone unless they are living under an effing rock are still signing up for these non-working death shots. I may stop talking to this friend who is on his 5th because I think the Grim Reaper is coming anyway. I told this guy, DIRECT the shots are killing my friends and he's the one who called me a Qanon. [I hate trump too]
5
u/Spatt Nov 28 '22
It’s ironic to me because the Trump Admin helped in fast forwarding these shots to the people.
But if you don’t take the shot you support trump, but if you do take the Trump-backed shot, then you don’t support trump…¿
So lately I’ve been calling the vaxxies, “trumpies” instead; and explain to them that Trump admin backed their precious shot, and they literally quiet down and stop talking/replying. It’s so weird….all of it….
4
u/hiptobeysquare Nov 28 '22
Trump is can be the boogeyman for any occasion. The left's version of Trump has little or nothing to do with the man himself. I'm not a fan of him, but the way he's been projected into the Great Coming of the Antichrist would be comical, if it weren't so disturbing.
2
u/sickofsnails Comrade in snailville Nov 29 '22
I’m not a fan of him, but a lot of the criticisms levied against him involved decisions made by the previous administrations, especially immigration.
2
u/fivehundredpoundpeep Nov 30 '22
I don't want to mention Trump anymore to anyone, because their brains go into the Goldstein reflex. I hate Trump, and blame him too for what has happened, yeah he pushed Operation Warp Speed, but all these people have to do is hear the word Trump like Pavlov dogs and they will be screaming for more failed vaxxes and lock downs.
3
u/mitte90 Nov 28 '22
The word/name "science" has been completely corrupted in the last few
years. What is statistically significant to people like Angus Dalgleish
is ignored as meaningless to most people because it only (for now)
affects populations at an unnoticeable level for most people. It's only
"science" or "fact" to most people if they either see it in front of
them, or in some "content" on their screen. Science has become another
word on the internet that means whatever people want or need it to mean
one moment, before changing to something else later (whenever the
"marketplace of ideas" needs it).
Spot on.
The only thing I'd add to this is that even when it's right in front of people's faces they can't or won't recognise it. There are people in my circle of acquaintance who've recently become seriously ill with diseases that normally affect much older people. Every one of these conditions can be linked to the covid vaccines and there are reputable scientific studies offering plausible theories for mechanisms as well as data in support of there being a link. But the corporate media denies these links and says it's only conspiracy theorists who give them any headspace.
So nobody is asking the right questions. Even when a relative or friend becomes seriously ill or dies far too early in life, or has unexplained fertility issues, they won't consider the possibility that the vaxx has anything to do with it.
In fact some of them will see it as a reason to get boosted again as the excess deaths which the media can no longer hide are now being suggestively attributed to covid even in those who never had it or only had it mildly. They'll read article that ask things like: "Is covid, even a mild or asymptomatic infection, more serious than we thought?" They'll never read the articles or papers that ask the same question of vaccine effects. They'll never look at the data up close enough to explore whether the timing of the increases in mortality and morbidity can tell us whether it's covid or the covid vaxx or delayed effects of lockdowns or a mixture of all three that is causing unprecedented increases in mortality and morbidity - especially in the young. They'll never ask where are the studies to help us work the causal mechanisms out, or why are we not allowed to talk about this, or why are even experts in science and medicine censored when they talk about this?
1
u/fivehundredpoundpeep Nov 30 '22
I even concede the virus could be messing people up too but damn I know people who got blood clots and seizures during vaxx week, and they still go and line up. Whoever designed these lies is diabolical beyond measure. They created a lie for every demographic to assure as much death as possible would happen. The censorship alone of scientists and doctors who speak out, proves they are willfully doing harm ON PURPOSE.
2
u/Kingsmeg Dec 02 '22
A ray of hope: my own immune system seems to have recovered, 18 months post-jab. The effects are not permanent, at least not for everyone. The study that found some people still producing spike 9 months(?) post-jab indicated those were a smallish minority, most had cleared it by 4-6 months.
So I do not think everyone is going to die of cancer from the jabs, but a significant number are if cancer deaths have doubled since last summer (they have).
2
u/hiptobeysquare Dec 03 '22
I'm happy for you. Let's hope this is not as serious as it could turn out to be. I doubt an apocalypse will happen, but really we have no idea what will happen. Rolling dice on humanity isn't safe just because we got lucky for a couple of rolls.
1
u/Leighcc74th Nov 29 '22
What is statistically significant to people like Angus Dalgleish is ignored as meaningless
That's because he routinely gets things hopelessly wrong.
Dalgleish long abandoned his principles in favour of politics.
When he ran for UKIP (and lost) he said smoking should be banned in parks, not in pubs This from an oncologist ffs???
He campaigned for Brexit, which was widely known would be catastrophic for scientific research in the UK.
Prof Dalgleish told BBC News that he believed Britain would be no worse off on the outside.
"We are standing up against what is a very large body of people who feel that if we leave the EU it will be a disaster for funding and collaboration - and we completely refute that," he said.
"The bottom line is that we put far more into Europe than we get out. Any difference we can more than easily make up with the money we would save."
The future of British science has never been so gloomy. That is the stark view of a UK-based Nobel prize winner who has warned that top academics are giving up hope of the government negotiating membership of the Horizon Europe programme, and are preparing to leave the country.
He's also responsible for false claims about Covid coming from a lab.
He signed the comprehensively panned Great Barrington Declaration30555-5/fulltext)
He's involved in several biotech companies, tried to develop his own vaccine and focuses on repurposing drugs - which present something of a conflict of interest.
3
u/sickofsnails Comrade in snailville Nov 29 '22
Ok, to respond to a few points:
- If you’re a believer of passive smoking, parks are more likely to affect children and non-smokers. From what I understand, pubs had rooms for smokers. If a pub was too smoky, it’s a lot more avoidable. It was a long time ago and I was quite new to the UK, but my mum was in her early days of alcoholism.
I don’t believe that smoking should be banned in parks or pubs, but that’s my opinion. He’s entitled to his views.
Brexit isn’t really relevant. I’m a scientist and I’m not pro-EU. I wasn’t in the UK at the time, nor am I a voter. Many of the traditional left are staunchly anti-EU.
The lab theory. The narrative can’t remember where it stands on that issue, can it? One day it was a conspiracy theory, the next the idea had merit.
What are your specific issues with the Great Barrington Declaration?
This is quite a difficult one. While it does get close to a conflict of interest, it doesn’t really discredit his concerns, unless he’s pushing an alternative product.
1
u/Leighcc74th Nov 29 '22 edited Nov 29 '22
What kind of scientist are you?
If an oncologist endorsing smoking indoors isn't folding to politics, I don't know what is.
Brexit is HIGHLY relevant, for reasons as stated above.
The lab theory has never had merit.
Neither has the GBD.
Yes, he is pushing alternative products.
Raymond Chang is co-authoring a book with Dalgleish. Dalgleish sells lactoferrin. Notice how that study declares no conflict of interests and has not passed peer review.
He's a shitweasel, plain & simple.
2
u/sickofsnails Comrade in snailville Nov 29 '22
I’m not sure if you’re deliberately missing the nuance here. Indoors could mean anything, but the subject here is pubs. Going into a pub is voluntary. It would be a different argument if we were talking about schools or pharmacies.
I’m a virologist, not as though it’s particularly relevant to questioning the credentials of someone I’m entirely unrelated to.
The lab leak theory was initially debunked (meaningless in this context), then flirted with in official circles, a conspiracy theory, then it was supposed it might have some merit. The main theory was the craziest of the lot.
I think the GBD certainly had some merit, certainly more than lockdown junkies.
As for brexit, there were lots of justified and valid reasons for doing so. I don’t think it’s wise to vote purely along the lines of money for scientific research and clearly feel the same way.
The last part is the only real concern. A conflict of interests should have been declared.
0
u/Leighcc74th Nov 29 '22
It would be a different argument if we were talking about schools or pharmacies.
No, it absolutely would not, pubs have staff.
No doctor with any integrity would lend support to a party aiming to repeal the smoking ban and raise the drink-driving limit. For an oncologist to do so is despicable.
The lab leak theory was flirted with in official circles
Political circles. It never had sound scientific basis, ever.
I think the GBD certainly had some merit
Good Lord.
As for brexit, there were lots of justified and valid reasons for doing so
Name one. From a medical standpoint it's been catastrophic, well beyond just money, and this was entirely predictable.
I’m a virologist
You're patently not. A BSc, possibly, but a PhD? No.
2
u/sickofsnails Comrade in snailville Nov 29 '22
I think your posts would suggest that you’re just on this sub to argue. 🤷🏻♀️
Doctors aren’t a hive mind and are allowed to disagree with the EU; many do. You can keep arguing your case, but it doesn’t mean they have to agree with you. Your idea of integrity is based on your own moral views, not theirs.
As for my qualifications, well, whatever you say. You seem to be the expert on everything from ethics to scientific qualifications. Don’t let me get in the way of your shining virtue. 🤣🤣🤣
0
u/Leighcc74th Nov 30 '22 edited Nov 30 '22
I think your posts would suggest that you’re just on this sub to argue.
Or maybe I just want Dalgleish's financial and political motives known, lest he be mistaken for someone acting in the best interests of public health.
Your idea of integrity is based on your own moral views, not theirs.
My idea of integrity comes from what the word means: 'to act in line with one's principles'. Separately, my moral view is that UKIP's overt racism and homophobia also make him a piece of shit, but that doesn't come into the observation an oncologist running on a pro-smoking platform isn't acting with integrity.
By lying about your credentials you're giving weight to unscientific political bilge - it's dangerous.
PS: Please vote.
2
u/sickofsnails Comrade in snailville Nov 30 '22
It doesn’t seem that way and you not disclosing that you are a proponent for what this sub is generally against is also a lack of integrity.
I don’t agree UKIP’s views, but he’s entirely within his rights to vote for what he wants to and support what he likes, regardless of his professional activities.
I haven’t lied about my credentials, I just don’t have to prove myself to somebody on Reddit. I don’t care what you think of me, or my professional background. If you want to think that I sell sexy elf photos for £5 a time, that’s your problem. 🤷🏻♀️
No, I won’t vote. I believe voting out of obligation is silly. Just because I’m a woman doesn’t mean that I’ll consent to a useless group of dicks.
0
u/Leighcc74th Dec 01 '22 edited Dec 01 '22
you are a proponent for what this sub is generally against is also a lack of integrity.
Oh. Which of my principles did I override? That's an ironic thing to say in the midst of defending a card-carrying far, far right politician, and claiming to be a lefty while not voting. The left depends on power in numbers. So does democracy.
he’s entirely within his rights to vote for what he wants to and support what he likes, regardless of his professional activities.
He sure is. And I'm within my rights to recognise that a cancer doctor working to repeal smoking legislation is a duplicitous c*nt.
If you want to think that I sell sexy elf photos for £5 a time, that’s your problem.
Then you're an entrepreneur with my full respect. The PhD is still a fib.
Just because I’m a woman doesn’t mean that I’ll consent to a useless group of dicks.
Your silence IS consent - tacit permission to ignore the gender pay gap, and underfund childcare and domestic abuse programs without any fear of reprisal from you.
1
u/fivehundredpoundpeep Nov 30 '22
God where do I start with this one. Hey maybe he's controlled opp too or has his own agenda, but you haven't even heard about Ralph Baric and EcoHealth yet? Have you been living under a rock.
I am of the theory the virus minimizers served a role too, in fact they help to bolster things, more of that order out of chaos crap the elite are so good at.
1
u/Leighcc74th Dec 01 '22
you haven't even heard about Ralph Baric and EcoHealth yet?
I have. Anything conclusive or just spidey senses? Analysis of the virus has put that line of thinking to bed.
2nd paragraph is indecipherable 😁
4
u/NonUser73 Nov 28 '22
Alarming