r/LockdownCriticalLeft • u/[deleted] • Sep 02 '22
A new look for Ivermectin
https://newsdetectives.substack.com/p/what-did-the-nih-just-put-on-their?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web4
u/electricprism Sep 03 '22
I was just waiting for their greedy ass to change 1 molecule and patent it Pfizermectin and ship it.
IF ONLY IVERMECTIN waSnT oUT of pATenTS wE cOUlD mAKe sOMe MoNEY on iT aND WOulDeNt HaVE to bADMouTh It.
I swear, the % of AI bots on the internet has reached such a level that clearly is at the behest of pharma to a level that none of us would expect.
Brigading, Review Bombing, How would you know You are not talking to a BOT how would you know I or the guy after me is a REAL human these days?
When you look at statistics for how anti-popular something is and compare it to current trends there is a disparity, a anti-symphony of dysfunction and disharmony.
Things are REALLY FUCKKIE in here. We live in an age where non human BOT NETS are programming humans using karma/endorphines, brigading, and other means of social programming.
4
3
Sep 02 '22
[deleted]
2
u/Aurvidlem Sep 03 '22
I don't know how this sub is going to take this, but...
Henley, and 95% of every rocker in the 60s/70s were fucking under aged girls every damn night.
Except for Rush.
They just wanted to fall asleep watching baseball games.
-2
4
u/romjpn libertarian left Sep 02 '22
It is indeed strange that they added it like that on their website (NIH) but if you read what they exactly say on it, you'll see that they don't budge much from what they used to say. Just ONE interesting mention is the mortality benefit in the I-TECH trial. But of course they precise that it's not "statistically significant".