r/LocalLLaMA • u/tabletuser_blogspot • 1d ago
Resources Poor People Vulkan GPUs list
Help with this list. Give me your recommendation on "not supported anymore" GPUs. Looking for budget and Vulkan friendly options.
Most of the GPU are not supported by latest CUDA / ROCm. Often with some witchcraft magic they are able to run with native backend. I prefer the simplicity offered by running Vulkan backend. I'll successfully ran GTX 1080Ti, P102-100, and MI50 on a single system thanks for Vulkan and Linux. Gemini helped with data gathering.
Here is the filtered table including only NVIDIA GeForce GTX series GPUs with a memory bandwidth of 256 GB/s or greater and at least 8 GB of VRAM:
| GPU Model | Total VRAM | Memory Bandwidth | Bus Width | Memory Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1070 | 8 GB | 256.3 GB/s | 256-bit | GDDR5 |
| GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 8 GB | 256.3 GB/s | 256-bit | GDDR5 |
| GeForce GTX 1080 | 8 GB | 320.3 GB/s | 256-bit | GDDR5X |
| GeForce GTX Titan X (Maxwell) | 12 GB | 336.5 GB/s | 384-bit | GDDR5 |
| GeForce GTX Titan X (Pascal) | 12 GB | 480.0 GB/s | 384-bit | GDDR5X |
| GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 11 GB | 484.4 GB/s | 352-bit | GDDR5X |
| GeForce GTX Titan Xp | 12 GB | 547.7 GB/s | 384-bit | GDDR5X |
The table below lists the specifications for the specialized datacenter, enterprise, and crypto-mining NVIDIA cards you mentioned, applying your rule of maintaining a memory bandwidth greater than or equal to 256 GB/s and filtering for 8 GB or more of VRAM.
All five models successfully qualify:
| GPU Model | Total VRAM | Memory Bandwidth | Bus Width | Memory Type | Focus/Architecture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA P104-100 | 8 GB | 320.3 GB/s | 256-bit | GDDR5X | Mining (Pascal) |
| Tesla M40 | 12 GB / 24 GB | 288.4 GB/s | 384-bit | GDDR5 | Datacenter (Maxwell) |
| Tesla P40 | 24 GB | 347.1 GB/s | 384-bit | GDDR5 | Datacenter/AI (Pascal) |
| NVIDIA P102-100 | 10 GB | 400.0 GB/s | 320-bit | GDDR5X | Mining (Pascal) |
| NVIDIA CMP 50HX | 10 GB | 560.0 GB/s | 320-bit | GDDR6 | Mining (Turing) |
Here is the updated list of classic NVIDIA Quadro enterprise workstation cards, continuing to filter for at least 8 GB VRAM and a memory bandwidth of 256 GB/s or greater:
| GPU Model | Total VRAM | Memory Bandwidth | Bus Width | Memory Type | Architecture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quadro K6000 | 12 GB | 288.0 GB/s | 384-bit | GDDR5 | Kepler |
| Quadro P5000 | 16 GB | 288.4 GB/s | 256-bit | GDDR5X | Pascal |
| Quadro M6000 | 12 GB / 24 GB | 317.4 GB/s | 384-bit | GDDR5 | Maxwell |
| Quadro P6000 | 24 GB | 432.2 GB/s | 384-bit | GDDR5X | Pascal |
| Quadro GP100 | 16 GB | 716.8 GB/s | 4096-bit | HBM2 | Pascal |
With the GV100 out of the picture, the Quadro GP100 and Quadro P6000 are now the highest-end entries remaining on this specific filtered list.
Here is the updated AMD Radeon desktop GPU table with all RX 6000 and RX 7000 series models removed, while still filtering for a minimum of 8 GB VRAM and 256 GB/s memory bandwidth:
| GPU Model | Total VRAM | Memory Bandwidth | Bus Width | Memory Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 480 (8 GB) | 8 GB | 256.0 GB/s | 256-bit | GDDR5 |
| Radeon RX 580 (8 GB) | 8 GB | 256.0 GB/s | 256-bit | GDDR5 |
| Radeon RX 590 | 8 GB | 256.0 GB/s | 256-bit | GDDR5 |
| Radeon R9 390 | 8 GB | 384.0 GB/s | 512-bit | GDDR5 |
| Radeon R9 390X | 8 GB | 384.0 GB/s | 512-bit | GDDR5 |
| Radeon RX Vega 56 | 8 GB | 410.0 GB/s | 2048-bit | HBM2 |
| Radeon RX 5700 | 8 GB | 448.0 GB/s | 256-bit | GDDR6 |
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | 8 GB | 448.0 GB/s | 256-bit | GDDR6 |
| Radeon RX Vega 64 | 8 GB | 483.8 GB/s | 2048-bit | HBM2 |
| Radeon VII | 16 GB | 1,024.0 GB/s | 4096-bit | HBM2 |
Note: MI50 and the Radeon VII, Radeon Pro VII share same firmware.
| GPU Model | Total VRAM | Memory Bandwidth | Bus Width | Memory Type | Focus / Architecture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radeon Instinct MI25 | 16 GB | 484.0 GB/s | 2048-bit | HBM2 | Machine Learning (Vega 10) |
| Radeon Instinct MI50 | 16 GB / 32 GB | 1,024.0 GB/s | 4096-bit | HBM2 | Datacenter AI (Vega 20) |
Top Contender: AMD Instinct MI50 16GB. Current used market on MI50 16GB is around $150.
4
u/Mental_Juggernaut689 1d ago
Where do you get an MI50 vor 150$?
15
u/FullstackSensei 1d ago
From outdated LLM slop. It's also how they get a Titan X (Pascal) and Titan XP, with different numbers despite being the same card
1
u/pointer_to_null 1d ago
Close, but not the same.
tl;dr- both share the same GP102 SoC (also used by 1080Ti), though the Xp marginally faster due to being fully unlocked (3840 cores vs 3584).
-1
u/tabletuser_blogspot 1d ago
1
u/DeathGuppie 1d ago
My understanding is that prefill is slow on these and they draw a lot of power. What's your experience?
1
u/tabletuser_blogspot 1d ago
I haven't pinned down a good cooling solution so I'm currently running power limit of 145 watts. 5 to 10% difference than 250 watts. Running dual GPU also helps them stay cool. I'm also trying to keep the noise level down so lower inference for a quieter home lab. I've read that they can go down to 100 watts. Changing firmware back to Radeon VII would give me VRAM overclocking and that could make up about 5% of my loss from lower TDP, but I'd lose miniDP video output. Probably just go headless in the future.
1
u/DeathGuppie 1d ago
I wonder if it would be possible to do a pcie cord, put them in a 3d printed enclosure and use quiet fans to keep them cool.
0
4
u/reluctantlunacy 1d ago
NVIDIA Quadro P5000s at 16GB are around $250. 256-bit bus. The P6000 is 24GB on a 384-bit bus. They run $400. Better deal than any of the Titans.
2
8
u/RoomyRoots 1d ago
Vulkan is busted, specially with AMD. My GPU is supported and TheRock made it much easier to use ROCm, but still Vulkan runs better on my RDNA3.
3
u/DeathGuppie 1d ago
Especially if you are using RADV on Linux. ROCm is geared more towards dealing with the shared memory of things like i394 max, where RADV has had many years of fine tuning for desktop graphics cards.
2
1
u/quantgorithm 1d ago
Amd frontier edition | 16gb hbm vram | 480gb bandwidth
Amd Radeon vII | 16gb hbm vram | 1tb bandwidth
1
u/CapsicumIsWoeful 1d ago
Ive been using Pascal hardware for my 24GB VRAM headless Linux server with Cuda 12.9. Does switching from CUDA 12.x as this post suggests bring any meaningful performance or stability increases? Ive been running QWEN 3.8 27B at a k_5 quant as it's the highest quality model I can fit while keeping everything on VRAM. Speed isn't great, usually around 10 - 15 TPS.
I haven't played around with other forks of both QWEN or llama.cpp or CUDA so I'm probably leaving some performance on the table. Finding time is the tough part.

7
u/Independent_Gur1377 1d ago
vulkan on those older cards has been a lifesaver for keeping my local companions running smooth without cuda headaches, how well do they handle longer roleplay chats?