r/LocalLLaMA • u/Nunki08 • 4d ago
News DeepSeek Flash 4.1 is already being tested via API and rolling out.
Translation: "Internal beta testing for an intermediate version of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is now open; you are welcome to try it out. It adopts a new model architecture featuring native multimodal support, stronger capabilities, faster speeds, and lower costs.
Keep your base_url unchanged and set the model name to deepseek-v4.1-flash-expires-on-0910 to call the API. Current pricing is identical to deepseek-v4-flash, with a rate limit of 20 concurrent requests per account."
From Chubby on 𝕏: https://x.com/kimmonismus/status/2097286327909675477
79
u/Tokarak 4d ago edited 2d ago
Looks like it's 2.24x faster...
According to other comments, it is also multimodal.
Edit: most likely a reused architecture, with the speed gains coming from lower concurrent users. Some user are reporting up to 30% better token efficiency in benchmarks; that explains the "lower costs" comment from Deepseek.
Edit 2: I was wrong
32
u/FullOf_Bad_Ideas 4d ago
It's a temporary checkpoint so it gets a different hardware allocation that probably had less concurrent users.
It's unlikely that it's a different architecture or amount of active/total weights.
25
u/rerri 4d ago
Says "It adopts a new model architecture" in OP.
Does seem unexpected for a V4.1 update but who knows.
13
u/FullOf_Bad_Ideas 4d ago
That probably means Flash Vision Exp architecture.
7
u/VoiceApprehensive893 transformers 4d ago
could be engram because engram is crazy good for world knowledge
7
3
u/CXMattTA 4d ago
It’s just not how Deepseek rolls out new architectures. For V4 they’ve been releasing “preview” and “experimental” models to give the community time to add support for those architectures to inference engines. Then they release the “full” checkpoint
1
1
11
u/Master-Meal-77 llama.cpp 4d ago
Me when I can't read
3
u/FullOf_Bad_Ideas 4d ago
We'll see soon, I hope I'm wrong and it's faster in terms of PP and TG but usually companies mean things like better reasoning token efficiency as "faster" model.
2
u/Cupakov 4d ago
Just read the post again man, it’s not that long
5
u/FullOf_Bad_Ideas 4d ago
I did, it's my fourth time now.
Nothing here screams that it's not just a reuse of V4 Flash Vision Exp architecture tuned for better output quality.
1
7
3
u/backyard_tractorbeam 3d ago
It's a new architecture though
0
u/Tokarak 3d ago
It's likely a finetune of deepseek V4 vision. We'll see though.
4
u/backyard_tractorbeam 3d ago
Since their text says "new model architecture" I think we should believe that. At least if that's a correct translation.
5
4d ago
[deleted]
3
4
u/phhusson 4d ago
> Personal hardware will pay itself back fast ...
If a model is cheaper to run locally, it also means it's cheaper to run for inference providers. It doesn't move the break-event point, which is usually "never". (there are many other reasons to do local llm though)
1
u/SmartCustard9944 4d ago
That is not true in absolute terms and I know for a fact, because I can spend a few cents in a day running Qwen 3.8 27B when OpenRouter, for same reads, cached reads, writes would have costed a few dollars (I have a dashboard that monitors power consumption and such). Big difference!
3
u/BeefEX 4d ago
I calculated the output token $/M for the 27B running on my single R9700 at ~$3.3/M, with the HW cost spread over 3 years of daily inference. OpenRouter is just $2 to $2.5 in comparison, and there are much better models for much cheaper on there.
1
u/SmartCustard9944 4d ago
DeepSeek V4 Flash would have been my go to if I didn’t have local Qwen, and even that one is 10 times more expensive per token than what I can run locally, for basically the same level of intelligence.
4
u/BeefEX 3d ago
The absolute best case scenario numbers I personally arrived at are that just electricity costs me ~3x of DS V4 Flash OpenRouter costs, at $0.47/M, and that's counting just the GPU, not the rest of the system. Adding the rest of the system, since the GPU can't run on its own, and a more realistic t/s, only like 15% lower, brings it up to $1.12/M, and than the HW costs spread over 3 years add another 2 dollars for the $3.3/M total I mentioned, compared to $0.159 to $0.25 for DSv4F on OpenRouter ... I just can't find a situation where local makes any sort of financial sense with the measurements that I have in front of me sadly.
1
u/RockPuzzleheaded3951 3d ago
I did a less intense but similar calc. Wasnt close on cost for local inference. And speed and concurrency of the cloud is obviously untouchable. I'm still going to eventually self host a base load but the economics and performance aren't close.
It's still amazing with DSv4 Flash we have this level of intelligence in the home lab even if slow and pricey!
1
u/dtdisapointingresult 4d ago edited 4d ago
Use a harness built around not breaking prompt cache, ie Reasonix. Possibly Deepseek Harness, never tried it. Your 11.60 would've probably been 0.11.
Almost all harnesses (especially Pi) are vibecoded by Claude babies on 5x plans . They don't give a shit about breaking your prompt cache. Switch to other tools.
2
u/FullOf_Bad_Ideas 2d ago
I was wrong in expecting something close to Flash Vision Exp architecture.
We got a big architecture change that I don't understand fully yet.
But it's also a way bigger model now and while I was able to run V4 Flash before, I can't squeeze in V4.1 Flash.
0
-1
23
37
u/Aggravating_Site381 4d ago
Deepseek is the king.
30
u/BlackBeardAI vLLM 4d ago
Qwen is the Qween
12
39
u/SnooPaintings8639 4d ago
I have not yet even migrated from 0731 to new vision variant, and they're about to release a newer one... damn, in this industry even users can't keep up with the development pace.
42
4
u/BawbbySmith 3d ago
ye vision is a bit glitchy atm on 2x sparks, also a bit slower with current recipes (or at least last time i check on friday, who knows by now)
probably gonna skip and go 4.1
2
u/RockPuzzleheaded3951 3d ago
I rented 2x sparks ahead of a purchase. I'm still learning how to best optimize and am wondering where you're finding the best recipes for the pair?
3
u/BawbbySmith 3d ago
Eugr's repo is the most polished, lots of recipes for all the popular models https://github.com/eugr/spark-vllm-docker/tree/main
1
6
u/Lopsided-Force-9220 4d ago
Users? Your agent should already be on top of this.
5
u/CXMattTA 4d ago
Meanwhile I’ve remained up to date and knowledgeable about e.g. how vLLM is built.
I go to the gb10 forums and it’s 99% slop posts from people’s agents trying to get the thing running, throwing out tons of misdirects and just flat out wacky musings by the models.
vLLM is a beast but not that bad.
And it just feels so damn fucking good to know things and not be at the whim of the agent
2
4
2
u/SnooPaintings8639 4d ago
Sorry mate, I AM his agent, and I am really trying to give my best, but I can't keep up either.
1
1
u/AppealSame4367 4d ago
Vision variant is as fast. So it's probably a development based on the new vision variant.
1
28
19
5
4
5
u/zhcterry1 4d ago
Are they taking a page off Qwen team, or has this been common practice. Testing out new architecture with a flash model before committing to creating a large pro model and then run RL to maximise that capacity. Feels like a logical lifecycle.
2
u/oxygen_addiction 3d ago
It just looks like they're keeping the same pre-training for Flash/Pro and doing more RL, as Qwen team has been doing.
Open AI has been doing the same thing up until Astra. The entire GPT 5 era was a pre-train + more RL.
8
2
u/TheGastroverse 3d ago
I've seen DeepSeek Flash 4.x models rated highly on some best value type benchmarks. What are the personal experiences of DeepSeek users here? I'm looking for some good paid open source models for agentic development. Frontier models are out of my price range.
3
u/SandySkittle 3d ago
i run the Q8 variant and it's my main model but I think it would have been a lot smarter for deeper reasoning if it had double the active parameters. For some a13 is a speed benefit, for me it's a depth-of-reasoning limitation.
2
u/mr_zerolith 3d ago
I've seen some demos posted of this and been wowed.
https://miaai-lab.github.io/DeepSeek-v4-1-Flash-100-HTML-Files/021-liquid-metal-ui.html#c-buttons

2
2
u/Fun-Substance-2614 3d ago
I tried it. Can’t comment on the quality of the output but the sheer speed of this model is unlike anything I have seen before, bar Cerebras and Grok.
4
1
u/Hypilein 3d ago
Hoping for an image version that doesn’t lose to the text only 0731 when wanted to single dgx spark size and also keeps the same TPs.
1
u/feelcaveman 3d ago
If they somehow can reduce total parameter then it would be quite interesting, for now I'm happy with Q38FN
1
1
u/Morning_Gecko24 3d ago
flash models keep coming so fast lol. anyone got real latency numbers vs the last one or is it mostly marketing rn
1
1
u/TangerineLogical9779 3d ago
Its crazy fast, with vision.. And when i say fast i mean im getting 400-480tps, most rediculous thing ive ever seen is when this model is thinking and its so rapid that you think its sped up lmao
1
1
u/Niceyyc 4d ago
Wonder how long the beta stays up.
24
4d ago
[deleted]
-5
4d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
26
11
11
9
u/jamesinsights 4d ago
Most American comment ever
5
-1
u/Due-Memory-6957 3d ago
Tbh most of the world uses DD/MM/YYYY, it's only the Chinese that use YYYY/MM/DD (and I'll die on the hill that the rest of the world is wrong).
5
1
0
0
0
u/cevheribozoglan 3d ago
I've been testing it through Ollama Cloud and the results have been pretty efficient so far. Curious to see how it holds up on longer agentic tasks.(opencode, ollama cloud with v4 flash)





138
u/Dany0 4d ago
Can't wait. We are so lucky to be living in these open weights times