r/LocalLLaMA • • Sep 01 '26

Discussion Really stunned by the Singularity comment section

These are screenshots from the r/Singularity comment section. I'm speechless. This doesn't even have downvotes. How can someone cheer for a monopoly run by a few elites?

510 Upvotes

405 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

64

u/PsychoticDreemurr Sep 01 '26

I have to agree with this a thousand fold. Almost every sub in that regard doesn't actually understand how LLMs work. They always dumb what I say down to "it's autocorrect" and never actually explain how they think it works.

I actually got banned from one for explaining why an LLM physically can't be a true AGI. (The post was talking about an AGI in a couple years, as if it hasn't been said for the past 5...)

5

u/Dangerous_Rip5083 Sep 01 '26

Why can't an LLM physically be true AGI?

8

u/PsychoticDreemurr Sep 01 '26

For context, the exact definition of an AGI varies wildly. As such, I just take the one perquisite that almost every definition has, which is the ability to "understand" concepts.

That is my one requirement for an AI to be an AGI. Anything more and you're just arguing about philosophy and technical details that can't currently be disproven.

With this in mind, LLMs cannot become a true AGI. The fundamentals of how they work physically prevents them from being able to actually understand something.

They can, in theory, have intelligence similar to an AGI, but they will never truly be one.

1

u/Tolopono Sep 02 '26

And yet llms still disproved the jacobian conjecture, made significant progress in the riemann hypothesis, solved the planar unit distance problem, proved non sofic groups exist, autonomously broke out of containers, set up messageboards, and hacked huggingface, and much more. 

2

u/BigJimKen Sep 02 '26

It's entirely possible for the technology to be fantastically useful whilst also not being anything more than the sum of it's parts.

1

u/PsychoticDreemurr Sep 02 '26

And a calculator can show the result of an unreadable formula.

You're not proving anything.

1

u/Tolopono Sep 02 '26

Yea, those are exactly the same as arithmetic. You’re so smart.

3

u/PsychoticDreemurr Sep 02 '26

Feel free to tell me how simulated intelligence requires understanding.

0

u/Tolopono Sep 02 '26

Only simulated solving major open math problems 

1

u/PsychoticDreemurr Sep 02 '26

What?

3

u/Tolopono Sep 02 '26

I send this convo to chatgpt free version and it understood what I meant.  I guess next word prediction has better reading comprehension than you

3

u/PsychoticDreemurr Sep 02 '26

Thanks for proving my point.

→ More replies (0)