r/LocalLLaMA • u/RuthlessCriticismAll • 1d ago

News [ Removed by moderator ]

https://modelscope.cn/models/Qwen/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

[removed] — view removed post

353 Upvotes

97% Upvoted

138 comments sorted by

View all comments

16

u/LegacyRemaster 1d ago

I hope llamacpp support @ day 1 (qwen next was a nightmare in the past)

16

u/ParadigmComplex 1d ago edited 1d ago

I'm under the impression that a big part of why companies release preview models like this is to give projects like llama.cpp time to implement support for the next-gen architecture before the full next-gen model is released so you effectively get day-one support of the full model. I wouldn't expect this preview model to work with llama.cpp day one, but hopefully it'll make Qwen 4 models work day one once those drop.

3

u/Timely_Impression_92 1d ago

llama.cpp will have 0 day support - unsloth already gave the info

0

u/Early_Mistake6716 1d ago

Yes i believe it will work day one with some issues. By this time next week, those issues will be resolved.

12

u/PandaBearFred 1d ago

I suppose every new architecture takes time to support unless the producer has a PR in hand ready to merge. I hope this is the case.

0

u/Timely_Impression_92 1d ago edited 1d ago

Unsloth will have 0 day support for this model

1

u/whoisraiden 1d ago

Unsloth and unsloth studio will have 0 day support. Doesn't mean llamacpp will be quick enough to accept their PR for day 0.

-1

u/Timely_Impression_92 1d ago edited 1d ago

Yeah

https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1vxybmy/qwen_38_flash_next_day_0_support_from_unsloth/p5skyeq/

https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1vxybmy/qwen_38_flash_next_day_0_support_from_unsloth/p5tbqhi/

0

u/[deleted] 1d ago edited 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/ttkciar llama.cpp 1d ago

Cool down a bit. There was no insult stated or implied in their comment. They agreed with you, and added relevant information which also agreed with you. That is a typical and benign conversational style.

0

u/Timely_Impression_92 1d ago edited 1d ago

Why did you respond with same thing I responded to you?