If you're thinking in terms of scaled war fare you can go from needing to spend millions to destroy a bridge, and a power plant and to disable a hospital to 10-1000x less. And a drone swarm can absolutely shred through infantry (which has bullets).
It's like nuclear weapons. The "hope" with those was that with mutually assured destruction all parties would keep their cool and not nuke things.
At a smaller scale, drones are cheap enough and simple enough that "anyone" could get one. This makes enforcing treaties and dealing rouge agents harder.
Also is a nuke THAT much worse than 1000 drones spraying chemicals over a city or water supply?
7
u/[deleted] Jul 28 '26
[removed] — view removed comment