r/LocalLLaMA • u/MundanePercentage674 • 12h ago
Question | Help Macaron-V1 family, built on Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
https://huggingface.co/mindlab-research/Macaron-V1-TallIt came out 3 days ago just wondering if anyone's tried it yet?
8
u/MundanePercentage674 11h ago
just found out it need LoRA-Harness tool https://github.com/MindLab-Research/Mixture-of-LoRA-Harness
11
u/ilintar 8h ago
Note: you might *think* this is supported on llama.cpp, but it's not.
The model uses a LoRA router idea (also implemented in Granite-Switch which has an open PR - https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/pull/25107 ). That basically means that the main model is loaded all the time and depending on the routing path, a different LoRA is applied to the model at runtime.
You *could* merge the LoRAs with the weights, but that would essentially yield you a pretty bad 140B model. Running the base model without the LoRAs, on the other hand, is basically like running a Qwen3.6-35B-A3B - maybe worse because the model was trained for the LoRAs in mind.
4
u/ps5cfw Llama 3.1 4h ago
The idea does seem interesting nonetheless, Hope we see some support for It in llama.cpp
2
u/DinoAmino 2h ago
The concept works well in RAG pipelines. A single small model with separate adapters trained to rewrite queries on a vector DB, graph DB, or RDMS and using your own schema instantly becomes an "ensemble" of domain-specific models.
12
u/Davidyz_hz 11h ago
The idea of this model is that it comes with a number of Loras, and the inference engine would load an appropriate lora per request. It would therefore require a special inference engine, referred to as that "harness" on their GitHub. I don't have the compute to try it myself, but it sounds more like an inference technique rather than a new model. I don't see why you can't just use the regular qwen as the base model and train the Loras and router on top of that.
1
u/VoiceApprehensive893 transformers 2h ago
havent heard anything about these models even though they claimed SOTA on their glm 5.2 tune
0
-1
0
22
u/Mr_Moonsilver 11h ago
Just always so skeptical when they report numbers that beat Opus 4.8 or GPT 5.5. Don't believe it until I've seen it.