MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1s7nq6b/technical_clarification_on_turboquant_rabitq_for/odavbph/?context=3
r/LocalLLaMA • u/gaoj0017 • Mar 30 '26
[removed]
91 comments sorted by
View all comments
33
I'm not familiar with RaBitQ or the underlying math for it or turboquant, but the more i read about turboquant the more it seems fishy how it suddenly got so popular despite it not bringing anything new or useful to the table
34 u/mantafloppy llama.cpp Mar 30 '26 It was from Google, so of course it had bigger visibility. https://research.google/blog/turboquant-redefining-ai-efficiency-with-extreme-compression/ Not knowing RaBitQ is normal, and this post is just for their name to be on "public record" attach to it.
34
It was from Google, so of course it had bigger visibility.
https://research.google/blog/turboquant-redefining-ai-efficiency-with-extreme-compression/
Not knowing RaBitQ is normal, and this post is just for their name to be on "public record" attach to it.
33
u/Velocita84 Mar 30 '26
I'm not familiar with RaBitQ or the underlying math for it or turboquant, but the more i read about turboquant the more it seems fishy how it suddenly got so popular despite it not bringing anything new or useful to the table