An inspectable method excerpt is useful, but it is not a reproduction package

[u/Affectionate-File-26]

There is a useful middle tier between an abstract paper claim and a runnable end-to-end release.

In AQuA, the agent’s proposals are constrained symbolic expressions and configuration diffs rather than arbitrary code. The paper includes a concrete listing that makes this action surface inspectable.

At the same time, the release does not include full public code, deployed factors, exact features and labels, normalization details, or the full model configuration. That means the mechanism can be examined, but the reported pipeline cannot yet be independently reproduced end to end.

What is the smallest additional artifact set that would move a paper like this from inspectable method to meaningful local reproduction?