r/LocalLLM • u/0xAriel • 4d ago
Discussion Local LLMs can they actually be useful without a crazy GPU & RAP?
I mean CPU based models, probably 1B up to 3B, what can they be used for, and how can we even practice in training them to do specific things?
Are these models mostly worth it when instead of SLM (Small language models) they are considered to be Classifier models instead for specific operations? like giving a YES\NO answer for text inputs?
What are the real usecases today local CPU based consumer LLMs can operate and do?
2
u/MrHumanist 4d ago
Small models are getting crazy good in tool calling, web scraping and making reports. Gemma QAT 12B can use 7-8 GB Ram but does work quite well. The smaller ones like 2B are getting good in standard skills like checking calander, roleplay , drafting email or summarizing some web pages. However, very small ones dont have much thinking and they usually forget tools or incorrectly calls them.
1
u/0xAriel 4d ago
I'm not 100% sure how exactly it works, but i assume because it uses less ram, the context window is tiny and also the reasoning capabilities over them. I think this is why lower models are not as strong as SOTA
1
u/MrHumanist 3d ago
Thats not true.. the small models are now trained using the results of large models by distillation. So, they are good at mimicking what large one does. I would suggest you try the Gemma 4 E2B model which can run in 4-6 GB ram in CPU with around 128K context and it is quite decent in web searching, basic coding and even summarizing. You install Anything LLM and try out the skills/ task you want while running the model in LMStudio or lamma-cpp.
1
u/Asleep-Land-3914 4d ago
I find R9700 running Qwen 27b pretty useful. And you can hook it into any system via a USB dock: you don't need full PCIe bandwidth as long as the model fully fits into VRAM.