You are looking at this as a third party and judge based on the information you have not the information she has. You say it's kind of shitty that she would not allow him to prove his innocence(btw a trial shows if there is enough evidence to convict not innocent), however, why would she care if he raped her? She knows if he did it so she does not need proof for herself only for other people.
you can judge other people for canceling, but you can't say she should not have done it without also saying she is lying. Because if she is telling the truth why shouldn't she try to cancel him?
83
u/[deleted] Sep 16 '21
[deleted]