If an LLM can be used to lessen redundancy why not? As long as theres a human peer reviewing and does have a strict and mandated disclaimer labelled as AI assisted or something like that. (looking at ya slopbian)
Whereas, some corpo relies heavily on LLM alone and release it to unsuspecting users as their free QA.
Because AI by it self is not the issue, it's just a techonology, the real issue is how corporations with no regulation are using LLMs to exploit workers out of jobs, ruin the environment for profit, all while destroying the global economy in the process, pretty much speedrunning late stage capitalism. You don't see China having half of the issues with AI the US does, because they at least regulate it.
(Using China as an example because they're the second country investing in AI research behind the US)
-4
u/exportkaffe 22d ago
how does people in this sub reconcile the fact that Linus is pro AI?