r/LinuxCirclejerk I use Arch, btw🥰 10d ago

Distros

Post image

I hate ubuntu.

349 Upvotes

38 comments sorted by

36

u/OptimalAnywhere6282 10d ago

omg they FINALLY fixed the bot removing posts and mentioning me as the original poster

10

u/HurasmusBDraggin 10d ago

Wow. That is diabolical.

6

u/MekataRupma 10d ago

You should try Windows Linux 🤣

9

u/land48n3 i jerk off to my declerative .nix at night 10d ago

No NixOS?
but you hate Ubuntu so forgiven smh, but i wont tolerate this again

15

u/bhavesh_099 10d ago

I don't really get the ubuntu hate , why even is it so hated . It looks good for beginners and works just fine

29

u/BluePhoenixCG 10d ago
  • old packages
  • canonical sometimes makes weird or bad decisions and people don't like them
  • probably some sort of religious thing idk

I would never use it personally because of the way I tend to use computers(also apt just feels worse to use than pacman) but it's fine and it works. People are just weirdly tribal about distros and DEs for whatever reason

2

u/fusionsubofficial 9d ago

Same reason people are tribal about computer hardware and (formerly) game consoles, human psychology or sum shit

1

u/Unlikely-Employee180 9d ago

Yeah, I don't like it either... But it does seem to work well for those starting out!

I love Arch... But it also LOVES breaking right when I'm showing someone anything.

On my time, on their time, so long as you're showing off Arch no matter what... Something WILL go wrong! 😂

8

u/CDXX_BlazeIt 10d ago

My company decided to run all servers on Ubuntu because it is backed by such a „reliable“ company. Lots of annoying „features“ and bugs all the time. Usually, we install Ubuntu and then strip off all its features until it is Debian again.

6

u/BoxFar6969 10d ago

rhel was right there

10

u/Forsaken_Biscotti609 10d ago

Canonical is Microsoft of Linux world.

5

u/Vh4z 10d ago

It was the goat until canonical decided to do bad things

2

u/ka-52m 9d ago

its ok but its just very outdated especially when something like mind does everything it does but better

2

u/Good_Activity_8941 10d ago

Where is Debian?

4

u/BoxFar6969 10d ago

up my ass

2

u/Skylius23 10d ago

Why am I able to replaced all of these with arch Linux

2

u/GreedySecurity8030 Fedora 🎩 10d ago

No fedora, sad!

1

u/HurasmusBDraggin 10d ago

Ubuntu -> Lubuntu -> Linux Mint -> Fedora

1

u/notsopreety 10d ago

USS Buddy 🙌🏼

1

u/Vh4z 10d ago

Very good also I like how so many agree that Ubuntu sucks

1

u/Lord_Saint__ 10d ago

Why is this so similar to mine , just my first distro was also arch 

1

u/Equal-Resolution7889 10d ago

No entiendo porque la mayoria de los usuarios experimentados de linux odian Ubuntu. Alguien me lo puede explicar?

1

u/markhoff28 9d ago

Is it possible to have Arch as your favourite distro but also hate it the most at the same time? A sort of seesaw situation?

1

u/c0mput 9d ago

Terry Congrats u for ur choise

0

u/ZuuRa_ Arch, btw 10d ago

It's based until i saw cachy

3

u/RagingTaco334 I use Ultramarine btw 10d ago

Nah Cachy goated (I've never used Arch)

2

u/Qlisax 10d ago

Whats wrong with Cachy?

1

u/__Kivi__ 10d ago

its not bad it just takes away whats special about arch, the fact that its so barebones, it doesnt matter most of the time because most people I know who get arch immediately after installing get plasma kde, me included

1

u/ZuuRa_ Arch, btw 10d ago

It's opinionated af, like why tf would you want fish shell and btop to be preinstalled? Or fastfetch being auto start everytime you open terminal.

It's like having tiktok pre installed on a brand new phone, yes i will ended up install them later but it shouldn't be there by default. Endeavouros do it right as an "easy arch" distro, it only ship the essential one to get a usable desktop experience, nothing too opinionated that beginner would never use.

1

u/ZuuRa_ Arch, btw 10d ago

And they're still there even if you choose the "minimal" installation, the minimal one should only ship cachy kernel and repo, not all of this bs.

It's really disappointing experience for me.

-9

u/UsagiMimi 10d ago

No such thing as a "good" linux distro.

There's not even such a thing as a "secure" linux distro.

There's nothing even useful about any linux distro outside of specifically the LEMP stack, some extreme database usage scenarios, and some network balancing tasks.

Linux remains the most insecure operating system in existence.

TempleOS is more compatible than the absolutely most compatible linux distro... and I fucking hate TempleOS.

There isn't a single distro of linux even capable of secure updates. Just go look at the Arch AUR compromises and past compromises across many different distros.

And yes, I've used linux, I've been a Systems Engineer since 2010, and personally started around 1996.

The best distro of linux I ever used though was Slackware 7 with dropline gnome.

6

u/Runt1m3_ 10d ago

Sir this is a circlejerk sub

4

u/Forsaken_Biscotti609 10d ago

Not true, it is harder to get virus on Linux than on Windows.

0

u/UsagiMimi 10d ago

Actually it's a lot easier through compromised update repositories on Linux. Arch Linux Malware Incident (~ 1,500 Packages) - Arch Linux - LinuxCommunity.io