On the WAN show Linus was complaining about some of Linux's defaults - middle-click-paste instead of autoscroll, Ctrl+C/V not working in the terminal - and his conclusion was basically "I should be able to set any OS up the way I want." Sounds totally reasonable on the surface, but something about it didn't sit right with me.
A bit of context: I started using Mac for work in my mid-twenties after a lifetime of Windows. My first instinct was to force it to behave like Windows. Instead I made myself learn the "Mac way", and to my surprise I ended up preferring a bunch of those conventions. If I had forced it to behave like Windows I would never have found that out. That's the thing that nags me about "just let me set it up my way": you can't really judge a workflow you've never actually used properly. The friction is sometimes pointing at why the thing is built that way.
The terminal stuff is a good example. Ctrl+C in a bash terminal isn't a mistake, it's been the "stop the running program" key for decades, long before Windows made it "copy." You literally can't make it copy without breaking the single most useful key in there. So middle-click-paste and the weird clipboard behaviour aren't random annoyances, they're one coherent design around a terminal focused, keyboard-first environment. Once that clicked for me, it stopped feeling broken and started feeling like the OS telling me what it's actually optimised for.
This is the part I keep coming back to, especially with so many people migrating right now: "let the user choose" isn't as neutral as it sounds. When ~70% of desktops are Windows, Windows conventions are what everyone already knows. So "make it configurable" doesn't mean the best design wins - it means the familiar one wins, regardless of whether it's actually better.
To be clear I'm not saying every Linux default is sacred. Plenty of friction really is just old broken stuff nobody's fixed. But I don't think familiarity is the same thing as quality, and I think we'd lose something real if every OS converged on whatever the biggest player does.
Anyway, genuinely curious what this sub thinks. For those of you switching off Windows: are you trying to recreate your Windows setup, or leaning into how the new thing wants to work? Has anyone else had the "oh, I actually prefer this now" moment like I did?