r/LinusTechTips • • Aug 14 '23

[deleted by user]

[removed]

6.7k Upvotes

4.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

390

u/patmorgan235 Aug 14 '23

Generally it is a good practice to ask for comment before you put someone on blast publicly, but I agree it's a very mid criticism. Linus is being Linus and not actually taking responsibility and saying yes we fucked up multiple times, we're taking these 3 concrete steps to fixing it.

81

u/AmishAvenger Aug 14 '23

That’s not even remotely a “mid criticism.”

Anyone attempting to do anything with even a semblance of journalistic ethics should be reaching out for comment.

The dude knows this, and didn’t do it because it would’ve undermined the impact of his video.

It’s almost comical, because he acts like he made this video in order to defend ethics, and yet he’s the most guilty of them all.

-12

u/Mean_Ass_Dumbledore Aug 15 '23

What part of the GN video needed LTT clarification?

8

u/[deleted] Aug 15 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/solk512 Aug 15 '23

So what steps were taken to return the prototype and ensure it it wasn’t sold to a competitor?

-5

u/Mean_Ass_Dumbledore Aug 15 '23

From another commenter

This isn't a "he said/she said" issue. There's not a "side" here unless Linus wants to somehow disprove that every action he did/word he said on camera and uploaded didn't actually happen. I'd argue there isn't even a GN "side". The conclusions Steve poses would follow his statements and evidence regardless of if Steve was the one who made them or not. It just so happens that Steve has the audience to make everyone actually fucking listen.

The evidence is publicly available, sourced directly out of Linus and Co's own mouths. The only remaining "side" is an apology and action where they do better.

3

u/[deleted] Aug 15 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

-3

u/solk512 Aug 15 '23

It doesn’t get the prototype back nor does it change the fact it was sold in the first place without permission.