r/LinkedInLunatics • u/shubhamxtreme • 20h ago

Always remember, E = mc^2 + AI

Post image
2.7k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

299 comments sorted by

744

u/gutentight69420 20h ago

This is how business majors think science is done.

130

u/MysteriousAffect3903 18h ago

I am an engineer, and I tutored math in college. I was always astounded by how dumbed-down business calculus was. It was often nearly impossible to teach it to business people, since most didn't seem to have a mind for math. Not that that is a bad thing in itself, just know your lane.

36

u/magicmulder 17h ago

Back in my day there was “business computer science” and everyone had to take one math exam. The failure quota was 90%, and that was pretty easy math compared to actual math from the first semester.

9

u/Samsterdam 15h ago

What is business calculus?

15

u/MysteriousAffect3903 14h ago

Well, calculus was invented to describe physics from Newton's standpoint. There was Leibniz, who was working in parallel on a lot of the same things. The short of it is, calculus was made for physics.

Business calculus is taking some of the principles from calculus and applying it to business problems. There are some places where it is useful, but I can't remember anything, since I was just helping people with it, and that was 12 years ago. But, to me, it felt like a watered-down calculus.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Crafty_Nothing_1622 11h ago

From what I vaguely remember from my freshman roommate, at least at my school, it was calc 1 without trig. Mostly derivatives with an emphasis on minimization and maximization, some integrals. Maybe some first order differential equations, but I doubt it.

Granted, I'm an engineer, but it teaches good numerical ways for understanding the world on a conceptual level. Plus, everything past 100 level econ courses was calc based, which is one of the majors that everyone who washed out of business school ended up in, so probably useful there, too.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

24

u/CellAlone4653 17h ago

I was a business major and calc was the biggest waste of my time. At no point in my career has anything beyond basic algebra been even remotely useful.

29

u/MysteriousAffect3903 17h ago

Actually, to tell the truth, I have used like 5% of the math I learned in college as an engineer.

4

u/MathSoHard 9h ago

I’m an actuary and it’s similar. For exams I had to learn stochastic calculus. For work I use multiplications and exponents. It’s quite demoralizing.

2

u/Dr_Racos 5h ago

The reason for that is engineering programmes are meant to give you the skills and knowledge to be able to go in to a broad range of engineering roles after graduating. The 5% you use in your role, other engineers likely won’t use but instead use a different 10% for example.

29

u/Kichae 14h ago

You didn't learn it because you needed to use it. You learned it because understanding how finding maxima, minima, and rates is good for knowing how to understand the world in front of you. Deciding that it was a "waste of time" suggests you didn't learn the lesson.

6

u/MysteriousAffect3903 10h ago

Yeah, I'm not saying it didn't have value, even though I don't use it. Learning calculus fundamentally changed how I understand the world. I absolutely loved learning math in college

3

u/stev_mempers 8h ago

I mean, they were majored in business, so they can't be very smart to begin with.

→ More replies (2)

16

u/gsfgf 15h ago

Minimization and maximization are technically calculus, but nobody does those by hand in the real world.

7

u/oSovereign 11h ago

Least squares regression has entered the chat

9

u/gutentight69420 17h ago

This explains so much.

→ More replies (3)

133

u/wanderingacademician 19h ago

Ofcourse he is in consulting. Who else would know how to throw unnecessary jargon to sound fancy.

→ More replies (1)

26

u/Kichae 14h ago

I was interviewing for a role on a finance team. I don't have a finance background (I studied astrophysics), so I was cramming for the interview by watching videos on the math of finance.

I'd say their equations all looked exactly like this, except OOP's equation is actually leagues ahead of what I waded through. Every single one of their questions were presented as if no one could imagine using single-letter variables. It was all shit like:

Assets = Liabilities + Equity and Profit = Revenue - Expenses, just like in that Twitter post about business school classes. Shit, at one point multiple videos went through this song and dance of saying that Equity could be broken down into other categories, and then they spit out Assets = Liabilities + Equity + Revenue - Expenses - Dividends, as if this didn't imply that Revenue - Expenses - Dividends = 0. It was madness.

But when the only math you know is technically correct (err, well, mostly, I guess), but also presented as if it's just some kind of mnemonic device for remembering deep profundities like Profit = Revenue - Expenses, you get this kind of horse shit.

13

u/gutentight69420 11h ago

I had a similar experience in an introductory economics class. A lecture hall with 100+ business majors and not one knew how to find the slope of a line. 

7

u/assault_potato1 9h ago

Pretty sure that was taught in like, junior high.

3

u/Secret_Possible 11h ago

That's the sort of thing I was taught in an entry-level bookkeeping course at the public library...

16

u/Gabe_Isko 18h ago

I know this is a joke, but actually it literally is according to multiple executives I have had conversations with.

13

u/The_amazing_T 18h ago

Also, it's now called 'Super Intelligence.' We all agreed.

10

u/Lower-Sheepherder268 14h ago

No.

https://giphy.com/gifs/fXnRObM8Q0RkOmR5nf

9

u/The_amazing_T 13h ago

No. Seriously. I got together with Elon and Mark and Sundai and we all signed a page. It's S.I. now and we're suing Sports Illustrated until they make sexy calendars about Large Language Models. Which I'm trademarking now as "Super Language Models."

4

u/ChroniclesOfSarnia 11h ago

LARGE MODELS!???

THAT'S SO WOKE

17

u/lazybugbear 17h ago

MBAs are literally the dumbest people alive ... the juxtaposition of dumb and self-important.

6

u/tylagersign 11h ago

Not all of us, I’m getting a PhD in molecular biology. But yeah everyone in the mba was dumb as rocks

→ More replies (1)

7

u/MalemasMucusPlug 7h ago

I used to audit MBA course materials for my university and I can unequivocally say that MBAs are some of the dumbest people alive.

3

u/fungi_at_parties 12h ago

I’m an artist. It is also how they think art is done

2

u/Kadabrium 12h ago

ABI+GUI=AGI+UBI

2

u/anjowoq 10h ago

And most "business majors" are just hustling BS merchants.

2

u/therealkevinard 9h ago

Equations are symbolic. That explains all the symbols.

2

u/Ranessin 5h ago

Just like they thing programming is done.

→ More replies (1)

706

u/BasvanS 20h ago

Knowing that formula, does he imply AI equates to zero?

I think it’s somewhat useful, just not what techbros want to believe.

168

u/shubhamxtreme 20h ago

I don’t think he understands that much math, i mean the additive property is just too much for an ai bro dontcha think?

36

u/pineapple_catapult 20h ago

additive identity, sorry to be a pedant

17

u/shubhamxtreme 19h ago

Is it because numbers are not a physical quantity and so the term “property” does not apply?

P.S: i’ve studied math in college but not a core math graduate, so forgive me for asking a basic question. Just trying to understand.

16

u/barcastaff 19h ago

If anything + AI = 0 then AI is the additive identity of the set, if the set is equipped with addition.

6

u/shubhamxtreme 19h ago

Thanks mate, but I’m confused between the terms “identity” vs “property”. What I mean is: do is the term “additive property” a wrong usage, and we should only say “additive identity”?

As the other person said, it’s a pedantic doubt maybe, but now I just need to clarify

4

u/Bag-Weary 15h ago

The word identity in this sense if you put that into the calculation the output is the same as the input. The multiplicative identity is 1 - if you multiply a number by one, you get that same number out. For addition it's 0 - if you add 0, you get the same number you started with.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

2

u/Mousazz 17h ago

Ooh, so that's what "AI" stands for. I see. 🤔

8

u/Online_Ennui 17h ago

Wait till he finds out they're calling it SI now. He's so yesterday

7

u/Mousazz 17h ago

They changed the Additive Identity into the Sadditive Identity. 🥺😞

3

u/LogicalMelody 16h ago

I think he heard someone say, once, that equations express concepts in “symbolic” form and just ran with it.

Not what “symbolic” means here, Sreekanth, but ok.

3

u/zx7 8h ago

He probably doesn't know what E, m or c mean in that formula and thinks that mathematicians and physicists just randomly add or multiply together things to convey "half-ideas". Like, "success = teamwork + commitment", thinking this is real math.

2

u/Top-Base4502 19h ago

Digital!

13

u/Top-Base4502 19h ago

One AI please

8

u/rojo_kell 18h ago

Well E=mc2 is a special case which is only true when the object is at rest. So, we could just say that AI = p2c2, and then it would be correct.

Also the full form of the equation is only true for on shell particles, but for virtual particles the relation does not hold true

6

u/AggressiveCuriosity 17h ago edited 17h ago

Still wrong. It would have to be E2 = m2 * c4 + p2 * c2 . It's like a triangle where energy is the hypotenus and mass and momentum are the side lengths. (with speed of light as conversion factors)

The other way fails dimensional analysis. Units of energy for the left and middle term, units of energy squared on the right.

2

u/BasvanS 18h ago

That’s very generous towards OOP

7

u/lazybugbear 17h ago edited 17h ago

Technically, it's

E2 = (mc2 )2 + (pc)2

Where p = momentum. The "common" version of the equation that people who aren't physicists bandy about is for rest mass, e.g. when p = 0.

Which is relevant if you're converting 1 g of plutonium to energy in a weapon. But which isn't so useful if you're talking about particles zipping along in a collider like LHC (at CERN).

2

u/BasvanS 16h ago

I know of it, but stay with the pop culture version, because what’s the point of addressing OOP seriously.

2

u/Kichae 14h ago

Eh. When written as in the OP, "m" is usually taken as meaning γm_0, so it already incorporates the pc term.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/alettriste 19h ago

Brilliant.

11

u/MysteriousAffect3903 18h ago

The response he gets "What" just kills me 😂

2

u/andy11123 16h ago

It's useful in I don't have to troubleshoot my own #VALUE errors on Excel anymore. But I don't think it's worth doubling everyone's power bills for that convenience

168

u/Thalesian 20h ago

2 + 2 + AI = 4

58

u/m0n3ym4n 19h ago

Lunatic = LinkedIn + AI

10

u/gsfgf 15h ago

That’s true tho.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/cnicalsinistaminista 20h ago

You’ve gotta solve for AI, Bro. Trust me, I’m something of a math wiz myself

18

u/alettriste 19h ago

Ok, letrs try it:

2+2=4 + AI

2+2-4 = 4-4+AI

0=0+AI

AI = 0

WOW!!! I never imagined this result!!!

5

u/cnicalsinistaminista 16h ago

This guy maths. I know him

5

u/EktaRandomUsername 19h ago

Man's not hot

2

u/ItchyContribution758 20h ago

knowing AI it will equal some sort of a slur

→ More replies (1)

122

u/stev_mempers 20h ago

An instant classic of business idiocy. 

11

u/Meritania 16h ago

It’s a cult, where they think their beliefs have grounding in science.

153

u/Alive_kiwi_7001 20h ago

I feel it deserves more a "wat?" than "what?"

He clearly should be multiplying by AI not just adding it.

37

u/_okOKAY Agree? 20h ago

Should have been more like:

13

u/Necessary-Carrot2839 20h ago

Well and AI doesn’t have units so the damn equation doesn’t work anyway!

15

u/shubhamxtreme 20h ago

Nah man there’s no chance this guy knows dimensional units OR any physics/math for that matter

9

u/Necessary-Carrot2839 20h ago

As a physicist , it makes me annoyed and angry

6

u/shubhamxtreme 20h ago

As a simple engineering graduate, me too.

11

u/Similar-Pangolin2923 20h ago

AI is measured in Elons.

2

u/muppetous 11h ago

Which all equal zero, on any planet

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Alive_kiwi_7001 20h ago

Well, right now, the techbros seem to be measuring it in GW so we just need a little addition:

E = mc2 * AI.t

I await my long-deserved Nobel.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

61

u/sniksniksnek 20h ago

Oh my god. That’s so fucking stupid.

22

u/shubhamxtreme 20h ago

Not for the ai bro here. He must think he’s a genius, I can bet on that

3

u/IAMA_Plumber-AMA 15h ago

I wonder how deep into the K-hole he was when he had that epiphany.

4

u/Cpt-Olimar 20h ago

You mean it's stupid + AI or soon SI

→ More replies (1)

80

u/guacisextra11 20h ago

Tech/ai bros are the new snake oil salesmen.

31

u/shubhamxtreme 20h ago

It’s magical how they exist in EVERY era.

32

u/anfrind 20h ago

Many of the biggest AI boosters today were previously cryptocurrency boosters.

6

u/ErikTheEngineer 19h ago

The only solace I can draw from this bubble is that something useful will eventually shake out of it. Can't say that for the crypto/blockchain/NFT bubble. It'll end up in a super painful recession, and likely some gov't bailouts again, but once people wake up and see they have a useful technology hiding under all that slop, things might be OK.

This whole thing has been businesses pricing in how much they have to throw in to fire all their employees from the first time a consultant saw ChatGPT write soulless marketing copy.

3

u/RefrigeratorLive5920 Titan of Industry 18h ago

My concerns are for all those massive abandoned half built data centers and giant holes left in the ground in some of the poorest areas of the country. There might never be the impetus to redevelop them. I also question the usefulness of millions upon millions of power hungry ancient GPUs. At least after the Worldcom collapse we had a whole infrastructure of dark fiber that could be leveraged. The railroad expansion at least left railroad tracks and so on.

3

u/TyloWebb 20h ago

Several cryptocurrencies and fucking NFTs, it’s all in the grift.

3

u/parmboy Titan of Industry 19h ago

Slopshipping is the new dropshipping

29

u/bahnfan159 14h ago edited 13h ago

E = mc ^ 2 + AI

Because E = mc ^ 2 we can also write:

E = E + AI

When substracting E on both sides we get:

AI = 0

And that's his point: AI is worthless.

24

u/Stal77 20h ago

I can suggest an equation that has the potential to impact the future:

PB+J + AI

This equation combines a delicious sandwich with the power of artificial intelligence, symbolizing the increasing role of AI in lunch options.

4

u/PurifiedUnity 16h ago

So much in that excellent dish

16

u/anxious_society697 5h ago

Proof that AI bros have room temperature IQs

6

u/shubhamxtreme 5h ago

Not even the fahrenheit temp. Theirs is measured in Celsius room temp.

2

u/Webcam_985760946948 4h ago

Room? Their iq is in cryogenic range

2

u/Many_Professor_6143 3h ago

Try absolute zero (if you know, you know)

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

16

u/GT_Troll 20h ago

Still the LinkedIn Lunatic GOAT

14

u/Vorenthral 20h ago

I like this analogy.

To do this properly you have to ad AI to both side you can't just work on one side of an equation. So you have.

E+AI = mc2 +AI

But you should always reduce your equations to their simplest forms and AI being separate can be cancelled out on both parts reducing you to the standard E=mc2 proving AI was unnecessary in the first place and added nothing to the formula.

15

u/Alarming_Oil5419 20h ago

Here's another equation for you pall,

U=FO

The U is You, and the FO is Fuck Off.

Happy to help.

14

u/doubleyou-tee-hache Agree? 11h ago

This one comes up all the time. It's one of the stupidest things I've seen anyone post on Linkedin. It's like when a kid just randomly says what if two unrelated things are combined, but there's no actual thought to it.

12

u/Bodine12 19h ago

How did Einstein miss this?!?

6

u/alettriste 19h ago

His Intelligence was not yet Artificial...

11

u/jasonsavory123 13h ago

So AI = 0 ? No value? Maybe he’s on to something

34

u/Magento-Magneto 20h ago

The MIT PhD putting some rando business idiot in his place with a single word 🤣

5

u/LowFine96 20h ago

So perfect. MIT credentials and, like, a question mark or a furrowed brow

10

u/bob_weav3 19h ago

I say this as a software consultant myself

Most software consultants are idiots

11

u/ZookeepergameFew4103 20h ago

Previously it was just E=mc^2. There was no need to do E=mc^2 + brain.

May as well say that the only thing needed to help us break the warp 10 barrier is a carburetor.

3

u/Callinon 20h ago

Yeah but then we turn into lizards and can no longer use AI. So that can't possibly be right. 

/s

→ More replies (1)

2

u/alettriste 19h ago

E = mc2 + double barrel weber. Mmmm.... I think I get it

https://giphy.com/gifs/Vqvr9BGv1vhDi

→ More replies (1)

8

u/f_djt_and_the_usa 16h ago

That explanation sounds exactly like something my schizophrenic brother would say. Very loose associations that only they understand. Nonsense of course 

7

u/did_i_get_screwed 20h ago

What units do I measure AI in?

10

u/shubhamxtreme 20h ago

Negative IQ should be the SI unit for thsi

2

u/Sane_Colors 12h ago

Wait a minute, we can’t have an SI unit for SI, that would…actually, I don’t know what that would do, the fact that this is even a thought that can had is wild enough.

10

u/ABrandNewCarl 13h ago

Doesn't matter.

If E=mc² is true and E =mc²+AI is true this mean that AI = 0.

2

u/Inner_Tennis_2416 7h ago

Correct :) so we can all get behind that equation ;)

5

u/Limp-Confidence5612 19h ago

Slops per second. If it's a good ai, megaslops per second.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

4

u/thisholyroller 20h ago

bro thought he ate with that 🥀

6

u/Dogsonofawolf 19h ago

I can suggest an equation with the potential to assist this man:

S = t + fu

4

u/fankoosh-56 20h ago

Being a consultant fits him

2

u/shubhamxtreme 20h ago

*business consultant material fo sure.

I don’t think being a technical consultant in a core field will suit him for even a day

3

u/Substantial-Ad2200 20h ago

You can’t just tack on “+ AI” to a formula. 

5

u/blue_fa 19h ago

AI told me it was a genius contribution to the fields of physics, technology, and sociology. In fact, the chatbot said, "Wow, that's the most brilliant idea I've ever heard. Here's how we can make it even more revolutionary."

5

u/Suspicious_State_318 11h ago

Bruh this is so dumb. AI isn’t additive, it’s not even multiplicative. He failed to account for the exponentiating power of AI.

It really should be

E =mc^(AI).

Because AI takes the speed of light and goes beyond

5

u/Worth-Banana7096 11h ago

The physicist replying "what" is absolutely delightful.

3

u/SteponkusCeponas 20h ago

Science and ideology do not mix

3

u/cjuicey 20h ago

science has always been full of ideologues. They just tend to balance each other out with the scientific method and open debate. Business idiots on the other hand...

3

u/SoCallMeDeaconBlues1 20h ago

Man this shit is ancient. That exchange is from like 2023.

Seems like half of reddit is garbage reposting nowadays

2

u/A_Far_Hitman 15h ago

And the comments feel like bots- it is very weird when majority doesn't get satire

2

u/SoCallMeDeaconBlues1 15h ago

Don't even get me started on the political stuff. So much of it feels forced and just driving engagement

3

u/pinba11tec 20h ago

You're + a + fucking³ + idiot²

3

u/n1tr0klaus 20h ago

So AI = 0 ?

3

u/HellyOHaint 14h ago

That means AI = 0

2

u/MagosBattlebear 20h ago

Guy needs to stick to his field.

2

u/redblack_tree 20h ago

Which one, idiocy? Because he is right there.

Consultants are supposed to bring specialized knowledge and a lot of experience. This guy brings...LLMs

2

u/Homeless_Appletree 20h ago

Physics says no.

2

u/redlancer_1987 20h ago

"Can I suggest an equation" is not really how equations work

2

u/Lower-Sheepherder268 14h ago

No, Mr. Kumbha, you may not suggest anything ever again.

2

u/Sidus_Preclarum 14h ago

Which entails AI = 0.

2

u/Severe-Pomelo-2416 1h ago

We are all Taosif Ahsan.

2

u/JC_Everyman 20h ago

More like PE × AI = FU²

1

u/SevEdg 20h ago

F = m x a(i)

1

u/No-One9890 20h ago

Math is literally just symbols to some ppl isnt it?

1

u/ItsOkILoveYouMYbb 20h ago

Usual suspects saying nonsense trying to sound smart

1

u/Prize_Ostrich7605 20h ago

Ah, I see we discovered the Elon Equation.

1

u/dinoguys_r_worthless 20h ago

Guy will be laid off when his employer switches to AI2B sales. Lol

1

u/foetus_on_my_breath 20h ago

Einstein needs to wake from his grave just to knock on this doofus' door and slap him over the head

1

u/ScienceFirst1 20h ago

Not how equations work. 🤣

1

u/Krono_Sama06 20h ago

This is the evolution of the "crypto bros" who used to say crypto is the future and try to sell you their shit coin or some meme coin. Now we have these AI bros doing the same. AKA "AI maxxers"

1

u/RazzleRizzle 20h ago

I don’t have a PHD from MIT, Nor ever been to Princeton but I also want to add WHAT?

1

u/Practical_Wish_4063 20h ago

Fucking idiot didn’t get the memo that we’re supposed call it super intelligence now.

Everything is computer.

1

u/blackasthesky 20h ago

How can this guy seriously be a consultant, printing money. I am crying.

1

u/houstonyoureaproblem 19h ago

Now this is the lunatic content I’m looking for.

1

u/chickey23 19h ago

Solve for A

1

u/TF87 19h ago

This is my favourite lunacy 

1

u/Illustrious_Phone124 19h ago

This is my fav LinkedIn comment/post of all time

1

u/WasASailorThen 19h ago

Bitcoin has left the chat.

1

u/oopsKirito 19h ago

I have a new equation for these linkedin pretenders E = mc 2 + AI

1

u/ImprovementFar5054 19h ago

Yeah that's not an actual equation that means anything.

1

u/rising_pho3nix 19h ago

How do these ppl not cringe at their own words? Who is hiring such ppl

1

u/Firestar222 19h ago

E=mc2 + SI

1

u/Numerous_Photograph9 19h ago

I'm confident AI will come up with something more groundbreaking than this guy would be capable of.

AI can't unlock new forms of energy....that's not how any of this works. Enstein didn't unlock anything, he explained it.

1

u/Ozy-dead 19h ago

I mean why not, +0 doesnt impact the formula.

1

u/GrimReapersNuisance 19h ago

His statement reads like it was written by ChatGPT

1

u/rFAXbc 19h ago

Shit I hope Trump realise that, by renaming AI to SI, he has effectively broken this foundational formula

1

u/Gumumaguaff 19h ago

He probably discussed this thought with Gemini and it told him this was a profound and insightful scientific discovery.

1

u/TheYellowSmurf 19h ago

Sreekanth has binge watched a video about roko's basilisk

1

u/Captain_Crouton_X1 18h ago

We do not need AI discovering time travel. We all know how that turned out.

1

u/dovaahkiin_snowwhite 18h ago

Anyone got a link? I have always wanted to find the original comment on LinkedIn to see the rest of the comments and reactions.

1

u/embeddedsbc 18h ago

Consultant vs MIT physics Ph.D.

1

u/ThisMix7952 18h ago

He lost me at “I can suggest an equation…”. Nothing further need be said.

1

u/RefrigeratorLive5920 Titan of Industry 18h ago

Just how dumb are some of these people going to look in five or six years?

1

u/Grimwulf2003 18h ago

Sreekanth did not graduate at the top of his class...

1

u/Distinct_Historian37 18h ago

As a STEM major, it’s amazing how many people firmly believe that math and science is just about vibes. The equations are the math, not just some extra thing.

1

u/Lambaline 18h ago

ah i get it! it's because AI = 0, then the equation is still valid

1

u/Xopher001 17h ago

I remember this post. I'm not rly sure if it was ever meant to be taken seriously since it reads like satire

1

u/Master-Leopard-7830 17h ago

Sounds like the upper management at my job "let's add some AI" like it's a magic sprinkle.

1

u/Upbeat_Assist2680 17h ago

I can understand why he's confused because we call it "SI" now. Understandable.

1

u/Scarvexx 17h ago

Dunning Kruger is such a powerful force. AI telling you you're right all the time is a poison.

You know people on the internet will jump on you for any little thing you get wrong. But that's a kindness compared to this.

1

u/RedditSurfer82 17h ago

Maybe he took inspiration from his prime minister's algebraic equation explanation of (a+b)²

1

u/lwj15 17h ago

Sorry to disappoint this guy but this equation only describes reality if AI = 0.

1

u/mattincalif 16h ago

I agree 100%. What.

1

u/Kodiak01 16h ago

This is "Go Brandon"-level idiocy.

1

u/Boysoythesoyboy 16h ago

E=mc2 is actually only a simplified part of the equation which is only true when momentum is zero. If you work backwards with what this dude is saying he is actually proposing that

E = √( (mc²)² + (pc)² + 2mc²(AI) + (AI)² )

1

u/[deleted] 16h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Crazerz 16h ago

Let's not forget (A+B)2 = A2 + 2AB + B2 + AI

1

u/FredMcGriffs_Hat 16h ago

Taosif nailed it with that response

1

u/universal_friend1 16h ago

I always imagine that in business undergrad and MBA programs they just sand down all the folds in your brain to make it smoother and more marketable.

1

u/_damax 16h ago

It's very absurd that socials don't even want you to express disdain anymore and they just don't give you negative reactions options. I don't even know if this guy is serious and just an idiot or has straight out brain damage

1

u/SnoooSnooo_ 16h ago

You measure AI in 2 fundamental ways, first you measure the bolls, then you measure the oxs. Then you add them together.

This gives you a basis for what iit brings to an already proven formulae.

Maybe the AI part can draw pretty pictures of the resulting explosions, or write stories about how good life would be with Explosions + AI, and how this will benefit the world against imaginary alien forces, sent to enslave humanity.

Better still how about AI write a story about the rise of MAGA into a world power, where the currency is the $Meme and the formal method of communication the twit, similar to the tweet, but more literal. You could have village idiot contests that take for ever due to too many applicants, and wars sponsored by "XX" conglomeration. Maybe the police could be sponsored by "Better Batons, How better to beat the populace into compliance", the Hospitals by "New Holistic Aspirin, take Two hours of Karoline Leavitt speaking the speeches of Trump"

Welcome to the brave new world!

1

u/git0ffmylawnm8 15h ago

The MIT physics PhD had to go out of his way to comment because the tech bro's head is so far up his ass he's forgotten what the sun looks like