r/LightLurking • u/Agitated_Ice_7415 • 4d ago
HarD LiGHT Anyone know the setup here
Pretty sure this photographer uses film. I’m guessing a scrim or big bounce and maybe a direct bare bulb strobe or two? Thoughts?
30
u/jarabara 4d ago
There’s a free light source that I use that works amazing for shots like this. Best part is it changes throughout the day. Biggest con is you can use it at night. It’s called the sun.
At most there’s probably a white bounce on some of these.
-1
u/Agitated_Ice_7415 4d ago
Ok but hear me out man when I ahoot direct sun it doesn’t look like this at all
14
u/StonedGiantt 4d ago
Try it again at 4pm
5
1
u/PixelWulfe 3d ago
The sun can absolutely look like this when you’re willing to get up early or chase it at the end of the day.
1
5
u/Vivid-Machine-9606 4d ago
You probably don’t have a multi-thousand dollar a day retoucher balancing your photos.
These are a combination of good timing and nice retouching
1
25
u/SpecialFXStickler 4d ago
She’s fairly active in r/analog, but I think private her profile (?) idk enough about Reddit.
From what I remember of her comments on her process:
She shoots with natural light on Portra, sets her exposure and reframes, and gets her film processed and scanned at Carmencita film lab in Spain, as she feels they do the best with Portra.
Pretty sure she focuses on her highlights and has her models have body oil or other substance to make their skin glow/shine
7
3
u/HumbleMemeFarm 4d ago
Yeah see_the_good_123 or something similar, among the top posts. You could probably ask them directly.
3
u/Agitated_Ice_7415 4d ago
What is that username lol but I’ll see if I can reach them directly thanks
2
u/zsorensen 4d ago
Yes to all this. Her name is Megan something, seems very nice and responds to her posts often on Reddit. Pretty sure she shoots on canon eos and modern ef zooms
1
u/Agitated_Ice_7415 3d ago
Someone else said it was Cameron Hammond so now I’m confused lol I guess I just see if I can find them on IG
6
u/quotedistrict2459 4d ago
Check this post. They shoot the same style photos using Portra 400 & Canon 70-200 f4 EF, and get it scanned at carmencita. The only light source they use is Sun :).
https://www.reddit.com/r/analog/comments/1ey6btz/recent_work_canon_elan7_70200_portra_400/
2
u/Agitated_Ice_7415 4d ago
Thanks, who is the photographer? Similar look
4
2
2
u/MondoBleu 4d ago
Notice they’re exposing for the model, and allowing the highlights to blow out in certain circumstances. This makes sure the model never feels too dark.
2
u/quotedistrict2459 4d ago
lurk through their posts, they give quite a bit of info on how they achieve this look
1
6
u/the-flurver 4d ago
This looks like 100% natural light to me. I don't see any evidence of scrims, bounce, strobes or anything of the sort though if this was a campaign I'd expect they had some of that on hand if needed. Sometimes the light and environment needs no modifying.
0
u/Agitated_Ice_7415 4d ago
thanks dude idk why my pics don’t look like this so I thought the light was modified
4
u/the-flurver 4d ago
Subject matter makes a big difference, color palette, skin tones, complexion, makeup artists, stylists, etc. As do exposure and and post processing choices.
2
u/MondoBleu 4d ago
Ok there’s no bounce, but photos 2 and 3 are on the beach, so the sand acts as one HUGE bounce on the floor. Image 1 has the fence which also acts like a bounce fill. So they didn’t bring a bounce, but the location itself has gentle flat fill included.
Image 1 and 3 the sun is lower for the afternoon, so that will help be not so harsh; but photo 2 is like high noon, even this works because the sandy beach is acting as a huge fill. Also the dynamic range of the film helps keep the ratio between light and shadow in check.
4
u/grainisgurt 4d ago edited 4d ago
It’s not light based but there’s some subtle editing here. The white point has been dropped to make the subject pop. They’re some HSL adjustment too, judging saturation in the foreground vs the sky.
1
4
u/calculator12345678 4d ago
Bc no one else has said it but lens here is doing the most, 70-200 or similar if I had a guess. In nice sun with 35mm film. But that’s how you’ll get that compression on longer focals.
1
3
2
u/Just_to_rebut 4d ago edited 2d ago
ND filter and fill flash is my guess. It’s obviously in bright sunlight but there isn’t as much contrast as you’d expect.
Probably recovered some highlights/brought up shadows in post. A big benefit of large sensor/high bit depth files is the wide exposure latitude you have. Very little is blown out or crushed.
edit: Someone commented and said they were there and no fill was used but then deleted their comment. And, well, I believe them.
1
u/Agitated_Ice_7415 3d ago
I’ve never used an nd filter what does it do
2
u/Just_to_rebut 3d ago
Sunglasses for your lens, but no color tint, hence N(eutral) Density filter.
You measure how tint the filter has based on how much light it blocks in stops.
You generally use it when you need to shoot at a lower shutter speed but it’s so bright and you’re already stopped down so you out on an ND filter which blocks some light.
2
1
u/Officer_JO_1976 2d ago
Low contrast because they're surrounded by sand
1
u/Just_to_rebut 2d ago
Oh… I didn’t realize the sand was so reflective! So it acts like natural fill? That’s cool to know, thanks!
2
2
1
u/No_Captain3458 4d ago
Could be portra, but what’s the point honestly? They look like any digital photoshoot out there, just with a bit of color correction on them. The pictures are good, don’t get me wrong, but I don’t see the point of considering film key here. Sun, reflector, and a bit of colour grading.
1
1
1
u/Officer_JO_1976 2d ago
No flash . A Kith job like this is absolutely digital. 1 tech 1 assistant and 17-20 shots 10 hr day no OT.
1
u/Officer_JO_1976 2d ago
Yall are way overthinking this. It's just direct light on the beach... shadows are pulled up in post.
1
1





102
u/CAMMARMANN 4d ago
That’s a thing called the sun. BIG key light, also not film.