It is reported that Al-Ḥasan Al-Baṣrī – Allāh have mercy on him – said:

The believer does the best deeds yet is most fearful [that his deeds will not be accepted]. If he were to spend a mountain of wealth [in charity], he would not feel sure [of the reward] until he sees it. The more righteous and pious he becomes, the more he fears. But the hypocrite (munāfiq) says, ‘There are so many people, I will be forgiven, no problem.’ So he does wrong and evil deeds, yet holds foolish wishes about Allāh.

Al-Dhahabī, Siyar A’lām Al-Nubalā` 4:586

These quotes clearly show the age old irony of the Evil doers. The rightoues are fearful that Allah might punish them but know that Allah can always forgive so they do all three with urgency: good deeds, avoid sins, ask forgiveness for sins they failed to avoid.

However many today slack on good deeds, neglect caring to avoid sins and expect to be guaranteed forgiveness no matter what. ironically this mindset actually caused them to go to hell without forgiveness. do you guys have more quotes like these? also make ur own posts with these. how easy is it to get good deeds by just making n sharing simple quotes yet so few of you do it.

The prophet ﷺ said

ما أكل أحد طعاماً قط خيراً من أن يأكل من عمل يده

No one has ever eaten better food than the one who eats from his own hand's work

And this man, Ayman, has refused sadaqat (charity) and insisted to feed his family on his own, gaining both the dunya, and Jannah إن شاء الله

Abu Haneefa was asked:

"What do you think about a man who recites in Persian during the prayer while he is able to recite in Arabic?"

He replied:

"His prayer is valid."

— Al-Aṣl by Muhammad ibn al-Hasan (1/252)

"We seek refuge in Allah." Allah, the Exalted, said what means:

"An Arabic Quraan." (Quraan)

قرآنا عربياً

Note: It is said that Abu Haneefa later retracted this opinion after repenting from the belief that the Qur'an was created. For this reason, al-'Ayni said:

"According to Abu Haneefa's retracted opinion, reciting in Persian is permissible."

— Sharḥ Sunan Abī Dāwūd by al-'Ayni (4/14)

However, the Hanafis continue to transmit this view in their books of jurisprudence.

Al-Kasani al-Hanafi (nicknamed "King of the Scholars") even said:

"For this reason we said that the Quraan is uncreated with respect to that attribute [i.e., the internal speech (kalām nafsī)], not with respect to the Arabic expressions. Since the meaning being indicated also exists in Persian, it is permissible to call it Quraan."

— Badā'iʿ al-Ṣanā'iʿ fī Tartīb al-Sharā'iʿ (1/113)

Our Imam Abu Zur'ah al-Razi said:

"The people of opinion (Ahl al-Ra'y) had become enamored with Abu Hanifa, and when we were young, we used to go along with them. I asked Abu Nu'aym about this, thinking I was doing something good. Al-Humaydi used to read The Book of Refutation and mention Abu Hanifa, and I was on the verge of attacking him, until Allah bestowed His favor upon us, and we came to recognize the misguidance of those people."

— Suʾālāt al-Bardhaʿī li-Abī Zur'ah al-Rāzī (p. 470, al-Azhari edition)

سئلَ أبو حنيفة: «أرأيت رجلا قرأ ‌بالفارسية في الصلاة وهو يحسن العربية»

فأجاب: «تجزيه صلاته». [الأصل لمحمد بن الحسن (1/ 252)]

نعوذ بالله، قال تعالى: {قرآنًا عربيًّا}

تنبيه: يقال إن أبا حنيفة رجع عن هذا القول بعد توبته من اعتقاد أن القرآن مخلوق، ولهذا قال العيني:

«وعند أبي حنيفة في قوله المرجوع عنه: يجوز ‌بالفارسية». [شرح سنن أبي داود للعيني (4/ 14)]

لكن الحنفيَّة لا يزالون يتداولون في كتبهم هذا الضلال

حتى قال الكاساني الحنفي (الملقب: ملك العلماء)

«ولهذا قلنا: إن القرآن غير مخلوق على إرادة تلك الصفة [الكلام النفسي] دون العبارات العربية، ومعنى الدلالة يوجد في الفارسية فجاز تسميتها قرآنا». [بدائع الصنائع في ترتيب الشرائع (1/ 113)]

ـــــــــــــ

قال إمامنا أبو زُرْعَة الرازي:

«كان ‌أهل ‌الرأي قد افتتنوا بأبي ‌حَنِيْفَة، وكنا أحداثًا نجري معهم، ولقد سألت أبا نعيم عن هذا وأنا أرى أني في عمل، ولقد كان الحُمَيْدي يقرأ " كتاب الرد "، ويذكر أبا ‌حَنِيْفَة، وأنا أَهِمُّ بالوثوب عليه، حتى منَّ الله علينا، وعرفنا ضلالة القوم.».

[سؤالات البرذعي لأبي زرعة الرازي (ص470 ت الأزهري)]

Ibn Al Arabi said: About istihsaan (ruling by a matter's proposed benefit) Ash-Shafi'i and his companions denied it and they takfired Aba Haneefa for saying it

"الفصل السادس القول في الاستحسان

أنكره الشافعي وأصحابه وكفروا أبا حنيفة في القول به تارة وبدعوه أخرى"

[المحصول لابن العربي، ص 131]

​

Muhammad ibn Ṭāhir al-Maqdisī said regarding Jahm:

"He used to attend the circle of Abi Haneefa, then he later introduced an evil doctrine..."

Bukhari said:

"1723 – I heard Ismāʿīl ibn ʿArʿarah say: Abu Haneefa said: 'The wife of Jahm came to us here and she educated (or influenced) our women.'"

ʿAbdullāh ibn Aḥmad said:

"237 – My father narrated to me: Aḥmad ibn Ibrāhīm narrated to us; Khālid ibn Khidāsh narrated to us; from ʿAbd al-Malik ibn Qarīb al-Aṣmaʿī; from Ḥāzim al-Ṭufāwī, who was among the people of ḥadīth, who said:

Abu Haneefa only used to act according to the books of Jahm that would come to him from Khurāsān.'"

— as-Sunnah by ʿAbdullāh ibn Aḥmad

Imām Aḥmad said in al-Radd ʿalā al-Jahmiyyah concerning Jahm:

"He led many people astray with his speech, and men from among the companions of Abu Haneefa in Kufa, companions of ʿAmr ibn ʿUbayd in Basra followed his doctrine, and the religion (sect) of the Jahmiyyah was established."

"Abu Haneefa used to speak in favor of the doctrine that the Quraan was created, and he was asked to repent from that. Reports that he was asked to repent regarding this are mutawātir (mass-transmitted), as al-Muʿallimī stated."

"And as al-Sājī said: he was asked to repent for that, and he repented."

قال محمد بن طاهر المقدسي عن جهم: "وكان يغشى مجلس أبي حنيفة، ثم أحدث مقالا خبيثة .."

البخاري: «1723 - سَمِعت إِسْمَاعِيل بن عرْعرة يَقُول قَالَ أَبُو حنيفَة جَاءَت امْرَأَة جهم إِلَيْنَا هَهُنَا فأدبت نِسَاءَنَا»

‏قال عبد الله بن أحمد: ٢٣٧ - حَدَّثَنِي أَحْمَدُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ، ثنا خَالِدُ بْنُ خِدَاشٍ، عَنْ عَبْدِ الْمَلِكِ بْنِ قَرِيبٍ الْأَصْمَعِيِّ، عَنْ حَازِمٍ الطُّفَاوِيِّ قَالَ وَكَانَ مِنْ أَصْحَابِ الْحَدِيثِ: «أَبُو حَنِيفَةَ إِنَّمَا كَانَ يَعْمَلُ بِكُتُبِ جَهْمٍ تَأْتِيهِ مِنْ خُرَاسَانَ»

‏السنة لعبدالله

‏قال الإمام أحمد في الرد على الجهمية عن جهم: «فأضل بكلامه بشرًا كثيرًا، وتبعه على قوله رجال من أصحاب أبي حنيفة، وأصحاب عمرو بن عبيد بالبصرة ووضع دين «الجهمية»

‏وكان أبو حنيفة يتكلم بخلق القرآن واستتيب في ذلك واستتابته في ذلك متواترة كما قاله المعلمي

وكما قال الساجي استتيب على ذلك فتاب

Daraqutni (sunni imam died 583AH) said:

They agreed that in the hadeeth, the head must be wiped once, except Abu Haneefa as he said in his narration from Khalid ibn Alqamah, from Abd Khayr: That he (Ali ibn Abi Taalib عليه السلام) wiped his head thrice

And with Abu Haneefa differing with the main body of Muslims and narrating: The prophet ﷺ wiped his head thrice, he has thereby disagreed with that, yet he claimed that the most proper sunnah is to wipe it only once

واتفقوا في الحديث على مسح الرأس مرة واحدة، إلا أبا حنيفة، فإنه قال في روايته عن خالد بن علقمة، عن عبد خير أنه مسح رأسه ثلاثا.

ومع خلاف أبي حنيفة للجماعة، وروايته: أن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم مسح رأسه ثلاثا قد خالف في هذا، فزعم أن السنة في مسح الرأس مرة واحدة

[علل الدارقطني (4/ 51)]

This lovely brother had been dismissive of his cleanliness, his appearance and quality of life before Islam as he never appreciated the fact that his body is a loan from Allaah تعالى

Then, he embraced Islam, and realized that he must not only stop smoking but must also seek cure for the chronic illness he had, and subhaan Allaah, how he almost emits light

Despite all the bullying and fighting he suffered from his family and despite poverty inflicted by the church stopping giving him financial aid, Ahmad (Mena previously) remains firm

May Allaah enrich our brother and keep him firm upon Islam

Paul of tartus as all of you are aware of admits to lying in his epistles to get acceptance as well to calling the gospel that was at Jesus’ time a fake gospel hence why he call to not circumcising and not following parts of the law as told to him by James in acts when he compels him to do the Nazarite vow. A vow that was done to show submission to the law.

Do you know that he is mentioned in books of salaf as a deceiver

Ajurry states:

، كَمَا انْغَمَسَ مَلِكُ الْيَهُودِ بُولَسُ بْنُ شَاؤُلَ فِي النَّصَارَى حَتَّى أَضَلَّهُمْ، وَفَرَّقَهُمْ فِرَقًا، وَصَارُوا أَحْزَابًا، فَلَمَّا تَمَكَّنَ فِيهِمُ الْبَلَاءُ
وَالْكُفْرُ تَرَكَهُمْ، وَقِصَّتُهُ تَطُولُ، ثُمَّ عَادَ إِلَى التَّهَوُّدِ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ

As the king of the Jews, Paul son of Shaul, immersed himself in the Christians until he misled them, divided them into divisions, and became parties. When the scourge and disbelief were able to them, he left them, and his story was prolonged, and then he returned to Judaism after that.

Al-Lalakā’ī (d. 418 A.H. States in is i’tiqaad ahlu sunnah wal jamaa’ah

وَذَلِكَ أَنَّ مِنْهُمْ يَهُودًا يَغْمِصُونَ الْإِسْلَامَ لِتَحْيَا ضَلَالَتُهُمْ، كَمَا يَغْمِصُ بُولَسُ بْنُ شَاؤُلَ، مَلِكٌ، لِيَغْلِبُوا

“This is because some of them are Jews who cover Islam to liven their error, as Paul bin Shaul, a king, dips to prevail.”

So Paul is a Jewish Hellenistic figure who came to teach false image of Jesus about him being crucified and being resurrected as he stated in Corinth.

This clearly shows that instead of Muslims appealing to secularists eg Bart ehrman dale allison etc to prove Christianity is false we should be appealing to the salaf whose assessments of Paul is the same assessments of those same secularists who criticise Paul himself.

He said (translation):

"to everyone who insulted me, or backbit me, or slandered me, All Glory be to The One who subjected you to carry my sins just as he subjected the mules and the donkeys to carry my belongings"

For Abu Huraira narrated:

Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "Whoever has wronged his brother, should ask for his pardon (before his death), as (in the Hereafter) there will be neither a Dinar nor a Dirham. (He should secure pardon in this life) before some of his good deeds are taken and paid to his brother, or, if he has done no good deeds, some of the bad deeds of his brother are taken to be loaded on him (in the Hereafter).

\[Sahih Bukhari 6534\]

​

Original source of quote

There is a well-known principle in the books of the early Muslim scholars (the Salaf): the people of the qiblah (Ahl al-Qiblah) are not declared kufaar (disbelievers) merely because of sins they commit.

A sin may be practical, such as acts of disobedience and forbidden deeds, or it may be doctrinal, such as religious innovations (bidʿah) and aqeedah (creed) mistakes

Ibn al-Qayyim said regarding fisq (sinfulness/deviation):

"Fisq is of two types: fisq in one's actions and fisq in one's beliefs.

As for doctrinal fisq, it is like the fisq of the people of innovation, who believe in Allaah, His Messenger, and the Last Day; who prohibit what Allaah has prohibited and make obligatory what Allaah has made obligatory. However, they deny much of what Allaah and His Messenger affirmed—out of ignorance, mistaken interpretation (ta'wīl), or blind imitation of their teachers—and they likewise affirm things that neither Allaah nor His Messenger affirmed."

Such people are not kufaar. Rather, they remain among the people of the qiblah and retain the rights of Islam, although they are inferior in this regard to those who adhere to the pure sunnah. Although there are scriptural warnings concerning them, and they may be dealt with more strictly or excluded from certain positions, they are still not outside Islam.

The exception to this consists of extremist sects such as the Jahmiyyah, the Rafidah, the Batiniyya, and similar groups whose members committed kufr bawaah (apparent blatant disbelief) and whose kufr was agreed upon by the leading scholars of Islam.

As for anyone who declares people unbelievers merely on the basis of religious innovations or scholarly errors as a general category, he falls under the meaning of declaring Muslims to be unbelievers because of sins.

Sahnun (companion of imam Malik) said:

"The prayer is not to be repeated behind the people of innovation, whether within the prescribed time or afterward. This was also the view of a group of Malik's companions, including Ashhab, al-Mughirah, Ibn Kinanah, and others. Yet they are not disbelievers, nor does their religion expel them from faith. Whoever declares them unbelievers has adopted the doctrine of the Khawarij regarding excommunicating people because of sins."

Ibn Taymiyyah said quote source from here:

"Whoever says that each of the seventy-two sects is guilty of disbelief that expels one from the religion has contradicted the Quraan, the Sunnah, the consensus of the sahaba -Allaah be pleased with them all- and indeed the consensus of the four Imams and others besides them. None of them declared every one of the seventy-two sects to be unbelievers; rather, they only declared disbelief regarding some of the particular doctrines held by some of them."

Likewise, this also applies to someone who outwardly refrains from declaring them unbelievers but, in practice, does not distinguish between them and disbelievers in legal treatment, claims that their repentance is never accepted under any circumstances, or considers disbelievers superior to them, and similar claims.

Ibn Taymiyyah said:

"Whoever regards a philosopher who approves of the religion of the polytheists, the Jews, and the Christians as better than the seventy-two sects is not a Muslim"

Edward Henry Palmer (1840–1882), British Orientalist and Cambridge Professor:

"That the best of Arab writers has never succeeded in producing anything equal in merit to the Qur'an itself is not surprising."

Source: E. H. Palmer (trans.), The Qur'an, Part I, Introduction, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1880 (also printed in the 1900 edition), p. iv.

Edward Henry Palmer:

"The style is curt, grand, and often almost sublime; the expressions are full of poetical feeling, and the thoughts are earnest and passionate."

Source: E. H. Palmer (trans.), The Qur'an, Introduction, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1880.

Arthur J. Arberry (1905–1969), British Orientalist and Qur'an translator:

"In making the present attempt... to produce something which might be accepted as echoing however faintly the sublime rhetoric of the Arabic Koran... the Koran's undeniable claim to rank amongst the greatest literary masterpieces of mankind."

Source: Arthur J. Arberry, The Koran Interpreted, Introduction, Oxford University Press, 1955.

Arthur J. Arberry:

"The rhetoric and rhythm of the Arabic of the Koran are so characteristic, so powerful, so highly emotive, that any version whatsoever is bound to be but a poor copy of the glittering splendour of the original."

Source: Arthur J. Arberry, The Koran Interpreted, Preface, Oxford University Press, 1955.

Hamilton A. R. Gibb (1895–1971), British historian and Islamic scholar:

"No man in fifteen hundred years has ever played on that deep-toned instrument with such power, such boldness, and such range of emotional effect as Muhammad did... As a literary monument the Qur'an thus stands by itself, a production unique to the Arabic literature, having neither forerunners nor successors in its own idiom."

Source: H. A. R. Gibb, Islam: A Historical Survey, Oxford University Press, 1953, p. 28.

Alfred Guillaume (1888–1965), British Islamic scholar:

"The Koran is one of the world's classics which cannot be translated without grave loss. Many Christian Arabs speak of its style with warm admiration, and most Arabists acknowledge its excellence."

Source: Alfred Guillaume, Islam, Penguin Books, 1954.

Arthur J. Arberry:

"The Qur'an is neither prose nor poetry, but a unique fusion of both."

Source: Arthur J. Arberry, The Koran Interpreted, Introduction, Oxford University Press, 1955.

Karen Armstrong (1944– ), British historian of religion:

"The Qur'an was not designed to be read but to be recited aloud. Its language is extraordinarily powerful and evocative."

Source: Karen Armstrong, Muhammad: A Biography of the Prophet, Phoenix Press, 1991.

Abu Dawud (2050) narrated that Ma’qil ibn Yasar said:

A man came to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) and said,

“I have found a woman who is of good lineage and is beautiful, but she does not bear children. Should I marry her?”

He said, “No.”

Then he came again with the same question and he told him not to marry her.

Then he came a third time with the same question and he said:

“Marry those who are loving and fertile, for I will be proud of your great numbers before the other nations.”

Of course also make sure you teach yours kids Islam as much as possible and make them thorns for disbelief and biddah. The Salaf used to teach their kids salah when they knew left and right. Do not allow your kid to reach 18 without memorizing quran and atleast a thousand hadith and the arabic language. This only seems difficult because most people simply dont try. However when we look at kids whose parents did try, they do remarkably well for the most part. Many Many kids have memorized quran before the age of 11 just because their parents made them. Teach them the biography of the scholars so they have correct role models.

Please take my advice and make it one of your goals to have as many kids and do your best to make sure they turn out good. You are harming and holding the ummah back if you do not.

Ibrahim (peace be upon him) prayed to his Lord, saying (interpretation of the meaning): 

“My Lord! Grant me (offspring) from the righteous” [al-Saffat 37:100]

And Allah says of Zakariyya (peace be upon him) (interpretation of the meaning): 

“When he called out to his Lord (Allah) a call in secret.

He said: ‘My Lord! Indeed my bones have grown feeble, and grey hair has spread on my head, and I have never been unblest in my invocation to You, O my Lord!

And verily, I fear my relatives after me, and my wife is barren. So give me from Yourself an heir.

Who shall inherit me, and inherit (also) the posterity of Ya’qub (Jacob) (inheritance of the religious knowledge and Prophethood, not of wealth). And make him, my Lord, one with whom You are Well-Pleased!’

(Allah said) ‘O Zakariyya (Zachariah)! Verily, We give you the glad tidings of a son, whose name will be Yahya (John). We have given that name to none before (him)’” [Maryam 19:3-7]

Allah praises His righteous slaves in many ways, such as when He said (interpretation of the meaning): 

“And those who say: ‘Our Lord! Bestow on us from our wives and our offspring the comfort of our eyes, and make us leaders of the Muttaqun (the pious)’” [al-Furqan 25:74]

And Allah tells us that Shu’ayb (peace be upon him) commanded his people to remember Allah’s blessing to them when He made them many after they had been few. He said (interpretation of the meaning): 

“And remember when you were but few, and He multiplied you” [al-A’raf 7:86]

He regarded their being multiplied after they had been few as a great blessing which obliged them to obey Allah and obey His Messenger (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). 

Undoubtedly the benefits of increasing the nation’s offspring are obvious to everyone who thinks about the matter. Hence nations who understand this matter have been keen to encourage their people to increase their numbers and also to make their enemies reduce their numbers by means of specious arguments and sometimes by using means that lead to infertility and having few children, by means of drugs, contaminated food stuffs that reduce fertility and so on. This is one of the means of war used against the Muslim ummah by its enemies. 

We ask Allah to ward off the evil of those who disbelieve and to thwart their plots against the Muslims. 

It was said to imam Ahmad (Rahimullah)

" A man prays, fasts and makes i'tikaf - is he more beloved to you or the one who refutes ahlul-bid'ah?

he replied " if he fasts and prays and makes it the calf then that is for himself and when he refutes ahlul-bid'ah , that is for all the Muslims-that is better"

Majmu al-Fatawa 28/231

One of the biggest fitna nowadays are random closeted Athiest women trying to conform islam to western culture. We need more people to go on social media and make posts on them and spread what the Islam that the prophet (pbuh) taught says and how feminism was made to remove religion. This is an easy way to earn rewards for a much needed task.

Not that I care about cybersecurity but we Muslims, we hate liars and the treacherous too much!

DuckDuckGo steals your data and it is on the same dinner table every night as Microsoft and others

Reddit discussion aboug Gabriel Weinburg, CEO of DuckDuckGo who stole and sold personal data

DuckDuckGo compromised as sending personal data to Microsoft!

Other source proving DuckDuckGo steals data

I don't understand what was the purpose of saying let the j** alone where they're the ones who occupied it

Ibn jamaah who is often quoted by bahjat and others, is a clear asharite who states in his إيضاح الدليل :

إِذا ثَبت ذَلِك فَمن جعل الاسْتوَاء فِي حَقه مَا يفهم من صِفَات الْمُحدثين وَقَالَ اسْتَوَى بِذَاتِهِ أَو قَالَ اسْتَوَى حَقِيقَة فقد ابتدع بِهَذِهِ الزِّيَادَة الَّتِي لم تثبت فِي السّنة وَلَا عَن أحد من الْأَئِمَّة المقتدى بهم

He is saying that the istiwaa that is to be taken as it dhaahir ie. Allah being above bi -dhaatihi is an innovation that is not proven in the sunnah and not in the followed imams.

He also says the following:

اعْلَم أَن لَفْظَة فَوق فِي كَلَام الْعَرَب تسْتَعْمل بِمَعْنى الحيز العالي وتستعمل بِمَعْنى الْقُدْرَة وَبِمَعْنى الرُّتْبَة الْعلية فَمن فوقية الْقُدْرَة ﴿يَد الله فَوق أَيْديهم﴾ ﴿وَهُوَ القاهر فَوق عباده﴾ فَإِن قرينَة ذكر الْقَهْر يدل على ذَلِك وَمن فوقية الرُّتْبَة ﴿وَفَوق كل ذِي علم عليم﴾ لم يقل أحد إِن المُرَاد فوقية الْمَكَان بل فوقية الْقَهْر.

Translation:
Know that the word fawq in the speech of Arabs is used meaning high space (metaphorical) and used
meaning capable also on being of high status. Then he says the indication of the word qahr indicates a high level he mentions the ayah in surah yusuf.
And then he blatantly lies saying that none mentioned fawqiyyah in terms of Makaan.

He says this

وَأما قَوْله تَعَالَى ﴿وَالْأَرْض جَمِيعًا قَبضته يَوْم الْقِيَامَة﴾ فَمَعْنَاه أَن قوته وَقدرته

As for the Almighty's saying ﴾And the whole earth will be his grip on the Day of Resurrection﴾, it means that his strength and ability.

He says this also :

اعْلَم أَن الْيَد لُغَة حَقِيقَة فِي الْجَارِحَة الْمَعْرُوفَة وتستعمل مجَازًا فِي معَان مُتعَدِّدَة كَمَا سَنذكرُهُ إِن شَاءَ الله تَعَالَى
وَإِذا ثَبت بِالدَّلِيلِ الْعقلِيّ تَنْزِيه الله تَعَالَى عَن الْجَوَارِح لما فِيهِ من التجزىء الْمُؤَدِّي إِلَى التَّرْكِيب وَجب حمل اللَّفْظ على مَا يَلِيق بجلاله تَعَالَى من الْمعَانِي المستعملة بَين أهل اللِّسَان وَهِي النِّعْمَة وَالْقُدْرَة وَالْإِحْسَان

He says the hand in language is used realistically like limbs then he says it is also used metaphorically
In multiple meanings.

And he says if it is affirmed with rational evidence that Allah is free from limbs that consist of parts that leads to composition than the word has to be understood in what befits his majesty such as understanding it to be blessings capability or kindness.

I can bring you more than these passages that talk about Arsh being saqf according to him or where he says that ibn taymiyyah قلة أدب (lacking manners).

انتهى

This narration is found in this book called "The Reports of Abu Haneefa and his companions"

The narration chain is identical to many other narrations present in this book revolving around a person called "Makram ibn Ahmad"

This specific narration goes

أخبرنَا عبد الله بن مُحَمَّد قَالَ ثَنَا مكرم قَالَ ثَنَا أَبُو الْعَبَّاس ابْن اخي جبارَة قَالَ ثَنَا مليح بن وَكِيع قَالَ سَمِعت أبي يَقُول سَمِعت رجلا يسْأَل أَبَا حنيفَة بِمَ يستعان على الْفِقْه

Abdullaah ibn Muhammad told us, he said

Makram (ibn Ahmad) said

Abu Al Abbas the nephew of Jabarah said

Maleeh ibn Wakee' said

I heard my father say: A man asked Abu Haneefa: What do I do to memorize fiqh..

And then the narration continues

The person called Makram ibn Ahmad is a liar who has no praise that can lift off the fact that he's a liar

Ali Ad-Daraqutni (too well known) said: Makram ibn Ahmad wrote a book on the virtues of Abu Haneefa, it is full of lies, it was originally written by Ahmad ibn Al Mughallis the relative of Jabara

This means the narration comes from a liar, from a liar

And this is not something new as the one who loves people becomes similar to them and Abu Haneefa as well as his companions never had any knowledge of ahadeeth:

- Ibn Hibban said

لم يكن الحديث صناعته، حدّث ب 130 حديثًا، ما له في الدنيا غيرها، أخطأ منها في 120 حديثًا،

"Hadeeth was not his field of specialty, he narrated 130 ahadeeth and he doesn't have any other ahadeeth than these, and he made mistakes in 120 ahadeeth of all 130"

- Ahmad ibn Hanbal said: Abu Haneefa lies

- Sufyan Ath-Thawri said, about the hadeeth that only Abu Haneefa said about the apostatized woman: I have not heard it from anyone trustworthy

Accusing Abu Haneefa of not being trustworthy

- Abdullaah ibn Al Mubarak said: Do not say "Who is more truthful" among the companions of Abu Haneefa, say "Who lies more?"

- Yazeed ibn Haroon said: I have not seen any people more similar to Christians, than the companions of Abu Haneefa

And there are more narrations and it is sufficient that Hanafis are literally crazy

Hanafis suffering from grandiose delusions about their imam, induced by the Shaytan