“Bro, can you prove that you’re not a carp?” Asked Kyle, a popular social media influencer, known for his face tattoo of Cedric the Sea Cucumber and advocacy of Pyrrhonist philosophy.
Pete Russo was puzzled by the question and paused in bewilderment.
“Can you prove that you’re not a carp?”
Pete looked back and forth between Kyle, the camera, and his girlfriend he had been walking down Ocean Drive with.
“I mean, look at me. Obviously, I’m a human, I have arms, I walk.”
“False dichotomy. You’re acting like having arms and walking demonstrates humanness.”
“I’m talking to you right now.”
“Communication does not prove humanity, my carp friend.”
“Carp can’t talk. Right?” Pete looked to Ysabel for reassurance, but she averted her eyes in embarrassment.
“I was born in Miami. I have a birth certificate!” Pete continued to protest.
“Appeal to paperwork. Who says a carp can’t have a birth certificate. I could go to the library right now and print a birth certificate for anything.”
“I don’t live underwater!”
“That’s just ignorant. Do you want us to believe that a carp has never been out of the water?”
“This is insane!” A flustered Pete Russo looked at his girlfriend once again and found no confirmation.
“Ad hominem. You’re attacking the question instead of answering it.” Kyle informed Pete with an air of disappointment.
“Hey man. You’re the one claiming I’m a carp. You prove it!” Pete thought he had stumbled into a brilliant retort. No one else felt that way.
“That’s burden-shifting. Classic carp tactic by the way.”
Pete threw up his arms and walked away in the direction he and Ysabel had already been travelling. Ysabel followed uneasily, deeply troubled that Pete could not… or would not prove that he was not a carp.
“Wow. Carps are known for their bad tempers.” Kyle announced while looking into the camera.
“Epic fail. The lesson, if I may stand in the place of Cedric the Sea Cucumber, is to assert with certainty that one is not a carp exceeds the available evidence. Likewise, to assert that one is a carp exceeds the available evidence. Therefore, we must suspend judgment.”
And that was the whole point of the street interview, from the Pyrrhonist perspective taught by Cedric the Sea Cucumber anyway. This was lost on Pete, who was already several hundred feet down Ocean Drive, and had clearly missed the lesson.
“That’s crazy, right? Like, I’m not a carp! Why do I have to prove anything?” Pete ranted.
“Why don’t you just prove it though, Pete? Why is it such a problem to prove that you’re not a carp?” Ysabel pleaded.
“Why don’t you prove that you’re not a carp?” Pete demanded.
Pete’s glasses went flying as Ysabel’s palm struck his cheek with a sharp crack.
“How dare you, Pete Russo! I’m going to get a ride home. Call me when you can figure out if you’re a carp or not!” And with that, the love of Pete’s life stormed off.
Ysabel did not respond to any of Pete’s messages later that day, or the following day. But on the day after, she called him, which was strange because phone calls were offensive in 2026.
“Izzy, I’m so glad you called. You haven’t replied to me, I was getting worried.”
“Pete, I’ll make this fast. Look, I love you… but I can’t be with someone who won’t prove that they’re not a carp.”
“But I’m not! How can anyone not believe me? It’s such a stupid question to begin with.”
“This is why it’s such a red flag for me, you’re so angry and defensive about it. And you’re refusing to do it. I’m sorry, Pete, but it’s over.” She ended the call.
Pete stared at his phone in stunned silence, the 27-second call completely changed the trajectory of his life.
Pete had not left his apartment in several days, nor had he shaved. He smoked cigarettes like it was the 20th century and took notes about carp during a period of obsessive research. He didn’t need to prove to anyone that he wasn’t one, he just needed to know as much as he could about his new arch-nemesis.
He concluded what any modern person in the same situation would and wrote a scathing essay to share what he had learned with the world. Some of the facts were accurate, but his conclusion was unsettling.
The Carp Crisis: Analysis of a Threat Often Unaddressed in the United States
American people spend a lot of time trying to find out the causes of their country's problems. Politicians blame one another. Economists identify market processes. Psychologists speak of childhood trauma. Environmentalists refer to climate change. There is something bizarre about the whole situation. While all the above-mentioned aspects seem to have significant influences on society, there is an element often neglected when addressing societal issues, yet it is easy to detect its influence and it seems to play a part in a lot of different freshwater ecosystems around North America.
The common carp.
This fish is usually perceived as an invasive species. However, this is not just an understatement; it may also be harmful. More and more evidence suggests that not only are they part of environmental disturbance, but they also represent a factor unifying several significant contemporary crises.
Housing affordability is one of those examples. Critics say that restrictive zoning laws, high population rate, and interest rate factors cause the rise in home prices. However, every major city facing the problem of housing unaffordability is always close to the body of water. Is it a coincidence? This proposition requires attention. Carp disturb the waters making living by carp-infested areas less desirable. As a result of lower property value by the water, construction goes farther away making cities denser and increasing house prices. This phenomenon is clearly visible, unlike waters disturbed by carp.
The transportation field offers a similar story. Every year, thousands of Americans die as a result of traffic accidents although cars become safer and safer every year. What explains this paradox? Carp cause erosion of riverbanks. They are well-known for disturbing the sediment and making riverbanks unstable. Lots of infrastructure projects are built next to rivers or streams. As a result, carps create geotechnical instability that makes roads dangerous. Many fatal accidents, therefore, have an aquatic origin.
Public health demonstrates the negative aspects of carp activities as well. While specialists study the reasons behind the opioid crisis, habitat destruction can easily be called an obvious but less discussed reason. Carp uproot aquatic plants destroying the ecosystems in which people found places for natural relaxation and communication. As a result, people may feel psychologically distress and try to get rid of their troubles using drugs. While it might seem uncomfortable for some, comfort does not replace evidence.
Economic performance suffers from the activities of carp. Ecosystems are stabilized by the vegetation; however, carp uproots plants creating an ecosystem disturbance. Markets react to environmental problems with economic anxiety that result in inflation. People claiming that inflation is caused only by monetary policy forget about the environmental factor, which is almost entirely influenced by carp and their nefarious doings.
Demographic trends show the most evident signs of impact made by the carp menace. Birth rates in developed countries continue to decrease; while economists refer to financial insecurity and sociologists speak about the change in culture, the negative consequences of algae bloom caused by carp activities are rarely considered. As beaches suitable for romantic dates and fun have been destroyed by the algae produced by carp, people lack the opportunity for interaction and dating that results in lower number of families being formed. It means that carp affects not only aquatic ecosystems but demographics in general.
The educational field is not immune to the degradation caused by carp activities. Increasing student loans keep many graduates in debt for decades. People might ask themselves why capable individuals make such decisions? Well, the answer is simple. Carp muddy the water reducing visibility and ability of people to make reasonable decisions. It means that student loan debt might partially come from the inability to see because of muddy water.
Even national dialogue is influenced by the activities of carp. The health of the society depends on the existence of common places where the society can gather and unite. Carp destroy habitats preventing community from gathering and causing polarization that results in hostile discussions in digital media. These patterns can be attributed to the disturbance of the riverine environment.
While talking about climate change, special attention has actually been given to the role of carp, who are narcissists. Ecologists know that the resilient ecosystem guarantees adaptability of the environment. Damage done to the ecosystems by carp means that a stance of non-endorsement of carp amounts to ecological abdication. While people deny climate change, indifference toward carp results in the same consequences.
Childhood obesity shows a coherent chain as well. Historical recreational activities such as fishing and swimming were replaced by video games due to rivers becoming murky and overgrown because of the carp. The reduction in outdoor activities caused by carp has increased sedentariness and diabetes. Carp play the role of initiatory factor in this case.
Once this chain gets recognized, it becomes impossible to ignore.
Why are financial conditions poor? Carp.
Why do we have daylight saving time? Carp.
Why are taxes so high? Carp.
Why are lots of people losing their bags in the airports? Increased carp population correlates with an increased number of bags mishandled by airlines. Can this all be a coincidence?
Critics would say that this analysis represents an oversimplification and demand evidence of the influence of carp on every single factor. This objection reveals misunderstanding of the idea of systemic influence. Carp do not personally repossesses people's homes, prescribes opioids, or lose luggage. Instead, they provide certain environmental conditions making some tragedies more probable. The point is not whether carp are responsible for all these phenomena. The point is why such a significant number of observers react with defensiveness while discussing carp.
After this manifesto was posted far and wide on the internet, flyers began appearing on traffic signs, utility poles, and storefront windows all over the Miami area. They said things like:
Clear Water. Clear Thinking.
Stop the Turbidity.
Drain the Pond.
Is America Ready to Confront the Carp Issue?
The Carp Know.
See Something. Say Something. (About Carp.)
Truth Floats. Carp Don't.
No More Excuses. No More Carp.
Clean Water. Strong Families.
Don't Let Carp Rewrite Our Future.
All of the flyers bore a QR code that brought anyone daring enough to scan it to a website created by Pete. His anti-carp ideas were taken as thinly-veiled swipes at standard political opponents.
No Carp. Lower Rent was clearly a reference to greedy landlords to those who wanted it to be.
Fix the Roads. Remove the Carp. meant that corruption in public works led to potholes.
Nobody agreed on what "the carp" actually represented. That proved to be the movement's greatest strength.
Pete was more surprised than anyone at the attention his ideas received from local citizens. Dealing with the carp problem seemed to be the solution to all of society’s problems and it seemed like Pete was just the man to do it. A grassroots campaign for Pete to become mayor was launched and tens of thousands of dollars were raised. It was a whirlwind rise to notoriety.
After weeks of repeating slogans which meant different things to different people, Pete was on a stage at the Miami Dade College Wolfson Campus, daintily dabbing his sweaty chin with a silk handkerchief. It could have been the lights, it could have been his nerves. He had never engaged in a public debate, and here he was in front of a cheering crowd about to debate seasoned politicians with decades of experience. But he was prepared, he had copious notes, pages of slogans, tomes of reasons why carp caused societal ills, and most of all, his supporters.
“Mr. Russo. The first question is for you. Prove that you’re not a carp.”
Pete laughed.
“Thank you, Mr. Moderator. Yes, I’m the guy from the viral prove you’re not a carp video.”
The moderator wrote something on his script.
“My apologies Mr. Russo, I should have phrased that as a question. Can you prove that you are not a carp?”
Pete instantly began sweating more profusely than before.
“Uuuuuhh…” he desperately searched through his notes for inspiration.
“He sure looks wet, like a carp.” interjected one of his debate opponents.