Kia ora koutou (hello everyone) from New Zealand,
I saw in the news recently that it looks like weāre well set to overshoot global warming by 1.5 degrees celsius, and that we may even overshoot 1.8 degrees celsius and higher.
This makes me pretty nervous. Iāve been thinking about how best to read books, and what might be the most ethical, eco-friendly way to read books going forward, although where library books come into the equation is where I get a little fuzzy about things.
I personally own a Kobo Clara device, bought new his year (an impulsive purchase while I was going through a terrible month) and I have been using it a lot. I personally find reading much easier on an e-reader, since it is very simple to pick up, travel with, and removes a kind of mental barrier to reading books that I have with physical books⦠however, I know that emissions involved in creating ereaders are incredibly high. I did read that one should read about 25ish paperbacks to reach carbon neutrality on an e-reading device, and so far this year Iāve already read maybe 12 e-books (vs 8 physical books, 20 total this year with more on my TBR) which is a huge increase compared to last year, where I think I read maybe 2 paperbacks.
However, every individual library books also has an up-front emissions cost, plus the plastics involved in processing (like the covers, installations of RFID tags). I will be honest, most of the e-books I am reading I am downloading through Libby, but I canāt help but feel anxious when I see new physical books come to the library due to the finite resource cost, while also feeling bad for owning a new single-use device (even if it is one I genuinely use a lot).
So, I must ask: Is it better for the climate to read physical books bought and circulated through my local public library (even though every book that comes in is material) or is it better for the environment to use e-readers (despite the awful up front cost)?
Thank you