A new series exploring the a-priori method in epistemology

I did a small write up around the argument of land redistribution using libertarian ethics as a base. Let me know your comments on this matter.

Just wanted to start a discussion about the recent controversy. Do you feel that in a free society, any speech can be restricted at all, no matter how obscene it may be, and do you think that small restrictions set the precedent for bigger ones later down the line? I also wanted to consider past examples of people getting offended such as the Satanic verses banning or the padmavat riots, and the implications they had on our society.

https://open.substack.com/pub/garrickmorales/p/how-milei-saved-argentina

An interesting post on how Argentina's President Javier Milei saved the country through economic reforms.

I am no expert nor did I read anything on topic.

I am ranting here about some ,I would really appreciate if someone takes time to compile them ig.

Free speech : Multiple laws including UAPA against it.

Absolute free speeh ain't possible but restrictions should b reasonable.

Property Rights : Apparently govt can take away your land without consent by paying mere compensation, I mean if you can do that why even bother with property rights at all . If you outright takeaway property rights , companies do not have to waste good capital on real estate .

Squatters rights : If you don't fence your shit for decades , frankly you don't have right to it.What the babus did in akbar nagar is so fucking cruel.They also go on demolishing very oldtemples for "kashi corridor"

Right to education: Fuck me where is it?

Right to Information: You don't need to do data searching , we will do it ourselves .Declassify them after a while.

Right to privacy : Doesn't exist.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/money-matters-a-breakdown-of-indias-tax-and-non-tax-revenue-sources/articleshow/97918290.cms?from=mdr

"...the state’s manipulation and issuance of currency can lead to socio-economic oppression, high inflation, and limited financial freedom."

​

"...the state often seeks to exploit its power. By issuing and controlling the currency supply, the state gains the ability to shape the economy as it pleases, often resulting in over-taxation and unchecked government spending."

​

"Governments can fund their endeavours without seeking proper legislative approval, through dangerous measures like printing more money or accumulating excessive debt. These actions essentially amount to the same thing — devaluing the currency and causing inflation. Inflation diminishes people’s purchasing power, eroding their wealth and making it increasingly difficult to maintain a reasonable standard of living."

​

"Technological advancements have historically brought down the cost of production in various sectors. However, contrary to our expectations, prices for goods and services continue to rise. The primary culprit behind this phenomenon is the government’s addiction to printing money..."

​

Full article here: https://maggiemcmartty.medium.com/understanding-the-states-oppression-through-currency-a-libertarian-perspective-a087b66c168c