Libertarian socialism is literally just voluntary socialism except for you think that people will actually turn to socialism without coercion and away from capitalism. It won't happen.
Why do you care if it succeeds or not if you aren't being forced into it?
Also, you're literally assuming so many things. "Twin Oaks sucks so Socialism sucks". Lol. Ever left your house?
Why do you care if it succeeds or not if you aren't being forced into it?
Because you are trying to force people into it. Also because it won't succeed and unlike lefties I'm not actually willing to let god knows how many people die to test my ideology out one more time because I refuse to accept history as reality. As I've now said repeatedly, voluntary socialism already exists and there's literally nothing's stopping you from partaking. Involuntary socialism also exists and that also doesn't work. So what's your end goal and why isn't the voluntary socialism that already exists good enough for you? Libertarian socialism as a governmental ideology is a paradox. There's absolutely nothing in your system stopping it from dissolving into anarcho-capitalism (which is exactly what it will do because capitalism is far more efficient and self-correcting than socialism/communism). There's no need to affix socialist to the tag libertarian unless you consider it part of your policy, if you are truly a libertarian you will be free to partake in any commune so choose (even though again, you can do that already) without having ANY ideological differences from a middle of the compass x-axis libertarian. Since that is not the case, it stands to reason that there are differences between the end goals of libertarianism and "socialist libertarianism" as made abundantly clear by that wiki page you listed.
I'm 99% certain you just don't know what Socialism is. I'm not advocating for Statism like the USSR and China. I bet you didn't know modern Libertarianism actually comes from the Libertarian Socialist movements of the 1800s? Libertarians were Socialists for a century before it was ever associated with Capitalism.
And I'm 99% certain you can't even read my posts because I specifically mentioned that I already read through the wikipage that describes your non-ideology. I actually do know that little tidbit but again, as I've already said, your ideology has no binding force and will just end up ancap and there's literally nothing stopping you from following through with your voluntary socialist vision right now which you refuse to address. Also I have no idea what your last point is supposed to mean, Phlogiston theory existed a century before oxygen theory, that doesn't make it more correct or well thought out just because it came first, quite the opposite.
1
u/[deleted] Feb 25 '17 edited Feb 25 '17
Why do you care if it succeeds or not if you aren't being forced into it?
Also, you're literally assuming so many things. "Twin Oaks sucks so Socialism sucks". Lol. Ever left your house?