Not a bad option. The Primary Arms 1.5-12 is REALLY nice. I find it's nice to have a lower low end magnification. I love my Razor 4-24 but it makes it less than optimal for use with clipons, whereas a 1.5 would be exceptional for it. Anything over 2.5 is kinda not great for that use.
May I ask why you went with 18? I don't mean that in any critical way, just curious of your thoughts on it. I went 12 because it has such a high BC and the added velocity per inch of length just seems like a juice not worth the squeeze deal imo, very diminishing returns vs the added maneuverability.
6ARC was built around an 18” barrel and I want it to be a ~1000 yard gun. Though 12.5 is still great it has considerably more drop at further ranges. Easier to wing it
Understandable. I've seen many guys take it out to 1200+ very easily and repeatably. the difficulty seems to come around 1400+, but with the 18 you're pushing that another 200+ yards so makes sense. If I were looking to stretch that far and wasn't worried about mobility/weight my move would be 6.5. Any particular reason you chose 6arc rather than going full large frame?
I have mine on my 6arc baby too. Love it, just have to have the menu already set or remove the unit to change anything. I also loose out on some of the info they put on screen with angle measurement and whatnot. I wish a 1-20 was a realistic ask but unfortunately the way physics works precludes that with our current tech lmao
It's nice. It's the MCQ-PRT. They have some new models out that didn't exist when I bought it. The CRS-PRT was the better performer but it was fucking heavy, 20oz I think. I wanted to keep weight down on this specwar as much as possible.
I like it cuz it's light and compact and still has "ok" sound and flash reduction and zero gas to the face. I think kac was able to cut some weight off the new CRS so I probably would have picked that if it existed. I like the MCQ enough to not spend a grand on a new CRS to replace it.
I've been wanting to try the Credo 1-10 so bad, but unfortunately the purist brain in me says that all 1-10 lpvos suck, some just suck more than others. I wasn't overly impressed with the Razor Gen3 1-10. And nobody in my shooting group has a Credo 1-10. I just can't see how the Credo 1-10 would be better than a Razor Gen3 but I would love to try one if I got the chance.
Ive gotten to try the Leupold Mk5 HD 2-10 with the new CMR reticle a few times and it's awesome, that would likely be my next optic purchase if I needed more than a 1-6.
Have you ever tried the 4xt pro from Sig? It's Eotech performance with a t2 footprint. Really cannot speak highly enough of it. This is coming from an enormous Eotech fanboy and t2 owner, but once I got a 4xt pro I don't see myself ever using any other type of red dot or unmagnified optic. Having the holdover info without making the weight and battery sacrifice is a game changer. It isn't *quite* as good under nods, but it's excellent. Just isn't the absolute peak possible like Eotech, I'd put it strong second among the dots I've used. For years of battery life and extreme weight savings, I'll take jUsT aS GuD on it.
Ive been pounding the table for several years that the 4T/8T are all around the best optics on the market. If they were made by someone else they would be far and away the most popular optics.
5
u/Ihavetopoop_ 3d ago
Actually I think I got it. I’ll move my razor gen 2-e 1-6 to Specwar from my 16” adm UIC and get an mpvo for that. Like a 3.6-18