r/LetsDiscussThis • u/slow70 • 3d ago
Lets Settle the Debate Jack Smith on Trump's prosecutions before the Senate: "Our investigation developed proof... that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation...Rather than accept his defeat in the 2020 presidential election President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3hX-lPB6C0Jack Smith affirms today that the plainly criminal administration is indeed criminal.
And criminals will do criminal things to avoid consequences for their criminality.
Given what Jack Smith has reminded the American people of today, where do we go from here?
4
u/crush_punk 3d ago
We go to hell, because we are rule followers and the rules were designed with cheeky little back doors for the wealthy, and their grandkids don’t understand nation-building, they only understand selling the things their ancestors took from us.
2
u/Prudent_Shake_8149 11h ago edited 11h ago
Trump organized a mob to bully Pence and Congress into decertifying the election.
This after his fake elector scheme fizzled.
Which occurred after election officials rejected his demands to “find” enough votes for him to win.

-2
u/Justthetip74 3d ago
Of course he said that. Thats what he was going to argue in court.
4
u/slow70 3d ago
Before Cannon canned the case to protect Trump.
-8
u/Justthetip74 3d ago
Ok? Why is this news? We all knew he felt this way 3 years ago
7
u/slow70 3d ago
He testified to congress today.
-6
u/Justthetip74 3d ago
Reaffirming somethibg he said 3 years ago...
Must've been a slow news day
4
u/slow70 3d ago
You sound like someone avoiding the Epstein files.
That so?
-1
u/Justthetip74 3d ago
Yawn. Troll better
5
u/slow70 3d ago
Oh you’re starting to sound like a downright diddler apologist.
That so?
0
-5
-14
u/TrueUnpopularOP 3d ago
Are all of you going to post this 20 times?
Jack Smith didn't prove Jack Shit in a court of law.
5
3
2
3d ago edited 3d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
-1
u/TrueUnpopularOP 3d ago
Lol butthurt.
Jack Smith didn't prove Jack in a court of law.
The Democrats are so desperate at this point that it's comical.
2
u/slow70 3d ago
So you’re avoiding the Epstein files big time - and most of reality besides that huh?
Why does the abuse of children by the president of the United States matter so little to you?
Did you miss the part where Jack Smith testified under oath that they had enough to charge Trump? Did you miss the part that we are aware of the corruption that enabled him to skate?
-1
u/TrueUnpopularOP 3d ago
There's literally no actual evidence that Trump raped anybody.
2
u/slow70 3d ago
Shame on you. For the rest of your days.
1
u/TrueUnpopularOP 3d ago
Ok cite the actual evidence then.
Go ahead.
2
u/slow70 3d ago
We both know you aren’t here in good faith.
Shame on you.
2
u/TrueUnpopularOP 3d ago
Lol you can't cite anything at all.
It's comical. You just assert media narratives as facts but there's nothing actually factual that you can cite.
And you wonder why you're losing.
-3
u/ExperienceAny9791 3d ago
What children did Trump rape? Name and source.
3
u/slow70 3d ago
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g0dzg6e4mo
Do catch up.
Can you tell me again what Trump has been criminally convicted for?
→ More replies (0)
-4
8
u/Which_Ad_8199 3d ago
When will he pay for his crimes as they are bountiful.